E
ECHO Suites Extended Stay
Hospitality
Founded 20225 locationsCompany Profile
Year Founded:2022
ECHO Suites Extended Stay Franchise Cost
| Franchise Fee: | $35,000Key Metric |
| Total Investment: | $11,510,000 - $17,260,000Key Metric |
| Liquid Capital: | $2,590,000 |
| Royalty Fee: | 6% of gross sales |
| Marketing Fee: | 4% of gross sales |
Quick ROI Calculator
Based on ECHO Suites Extended Stay's actual financial data
Outlet Counts by Year
Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
Total US Locations:5
Scale relative to 1,000 locations
Franchised Units:5
Additional Information
Processing Franchise Details
Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.
Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.
Search Interests & Trends
Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis
Search Interest & Trends
No Trends Data Available
Trend analysis data for ECHO Suites Extended Stay is being collected. Check back soon for insights.
AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis
Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.
11
High Risk
Critical items
31% of total
20
Medium Risk
Monitor closely
56% of total
5
Low Risk
Manageable items
14% of total
36
Total Items
Factors analyzed
10 categories
5.83
Overall Score
Low RiskHigh Risk
010
Franchisor Stability Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
New Brand with Limited Operating History
High
Explanation:
- ECHO Suites was founded in 2022, giving it a very limited operating history. This lack of experience increases the risk of unforeseen challenges and potentially flawed business models.
- Item 20, Table 3 shows zero franchised outlets at the start of 2024 and only 5 open by the end of the year. This limited track record makes it difficult to assess the long-term viability and profitability of the franchise model.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the parent company, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, and their experience in the hospitality industry. Their established presence may offer some stability and support.
- Carefully analyze the financial projections and understand the assumptions behind them. Consult with experienced financial advisors to assess the realism of the projected returns.
- Seek legal counsel specializing in franchising to review the Franchise Agreement and understand your rights and obligations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 20, Table 3: Shows limited franchise outlet history.
Conflict Resolution at Franchisor's Discretion
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that conflict resolution regarding territory, customers, and support will be "entirely within our discretion." This lack of a defined process creates a significant power imbalance and leaves franchisees vulnerable to potentially unfair decisions by the franchisor.
- The FDD explicitly states there is "no procedure for resolving conflicts between you and franchisees of other brands." This raises concerns about potential competition and cannibalization within the broader Wyndham network.
Potential Mitigations:
- Negotiate for more specific conflict resolution mechanisms within the Franchise Agreement. Seek legal counsel to assist in this process.
- Clearly understand the potential for conflicts with other Wyndham brands and assess the competitive landscape in your target market.
FDD Citations:
- Page 63: "Any conflicts between you and us... will be resolved under the Franchise Agreement. We have no procedure for resolving conflicts between you and franchisees of other brands. However, any resolution of any conflicts... will be entirely within our discretion."
Potential for Competition from Parent Company and Affiliates
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD discloses that Wyndham and its affiliates may operate other lodging facilities in your trading area. This creates potential competition and could impact your market share.
- While the FDD states that Chain Facilities will be prioritized in their reservation system, the criteria for prioritization are subjective and could still disadvantage franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully analyze the existing competitive landscape, including other Wyndham brands, in your target market.
- Understand the reservation system prioritization criteria and assess the potential impact on your business.
FDD Citations:
- Page 63: "Our affiliates may own, manage or franchise in your trading area... lodging facilities... We will prioritize Chain Facilities over other hotels..."
Disclosure & Representation Risks
3 risks identified
3
Enforceability of Termination Clause in Bankruptcy
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD discloses that the franchise agreement's termination clause in the event of franchisee bankruptcy may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law. This creates uncertainty for the franchisor in protecting its brand and system in such scenarios.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with legal counsel specializing in both franchise and bankruptcy law to revise the termination clause to maximize its enforceability while complying with federal bankruptcy regulations.
- Develop alternative strategies for mitigating brand and system damage in the event of franchisee bankruptcy, such as negotiated transfers or temporary operational oversight.
FDD Citations:
- Item 23, Exhibit A, California Addendum 1: "The Franchise Agreement provides for termination upon bankruptcy. This provision may not be enforceable under federal bankruptcy law (11 U.S.C.A. Sec. 101 et seq.)."
Choice of Law Provision Enforceability
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD states that the franchise agreement's choice of law provision (New Jersey law) may not be enforceable under California law. This could lead to legal disputes over which state's laws govern the franchise relationship, creating uncertainty and potentially increased litigation costs.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with legal counsel in California to assess the enforceability of the choice of law provision and explore alternative approaches that may be more acceptable under California law.
- Consider including language in the franchise agreement that addresses potential conflicts of law and provides a mechanism for resolving such disputes.
FDD Citations:
- Item 23, Exhibit A, California Addendum 2: "The Franchise Agreement requires application of the laws of New Jersey. This provision may not be enforceable under California law."
Invalidity of General Release of Claims upon Renewal/Transfer
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD notes that any requirement for franchisees to sign a general release of claims upon renewal or transfer is void under California law. This limits the franchisor's ability to protect itself from potential future claims related to past actions or events.
Potential Mitigations:
- Remove any general release of claims requirements from the franchise agreement for California franchisees.
- Consult with legal counsel to explore alternative, permissible ways to address potential claims upon renewal or transfer, such as specific releases for known issues.
FDD Citations:
- Item 23, Exhibit A, California Addendum 3: "If the Franchise Agreement requires you to execute a general release of claims upon renewal or transfer of the Franchise Agreement, California Corporations Code Section 31512 provides that...Section 31512 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Investment Law...California Business and Professions Code Section 20010 voids a waiver of your rights under the Franchise Relations Act."
Financial & Fee Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Non-Refundable Initial Franchise Fee
High
Explanation:
- The initial franchise fee is non-refundable, representing a significant financial loss if the franchise relationship terminates prematurely or the business fails.
- Item 10 mentions potential deferral of the initial fee, but the terms and conditions of this deferral are not specified, creating uncertainty.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review Item 10 to understand the deferral options and negotiate favorable terms.
- Conduct thorough due diligence to assess the franchise opportunity and minimize the risk of failure.
- Consult with a franchise attorney to understand the implications of the non-refundable fee and negotiate potential safeguards.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5: "See Item 5 for amount or formula of each fee."
- Item 10: "We may defer payment of the Initial Fee. See Item 10."
- General: "Unless otherwise noted, all fees are non-refundable."
Uncertainty in Training Costs
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD provides a wide range for training costs, making it difficult to accurately budget and potentially leading to unexpected expenses.
- The variability depends on factors like the number of attendees and travel expenses, which can be difficult to predict.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request a detailed breakdown of training costs for different scenarios (e.g., one attendee vs. two, driving vs. flying).
- Budget for the high end of the range to avoid financial surprises.
- Negotiate a fixed training fee or a cap on travel expenses.
FDD Citations:
- Item 3: "The low and high end of the range includes your Continuing Education Fee..."
- Item 4: "The low and high end of the range presumes that your general manager/owner will drive..."
Variable Real Estate Costs
High
Explanation:
- The FDD provides no estimate for real estate costs, which can be a substantial portion of the initial investment.
- The franchisor acknowledges wide variability based on location, size, and market conditions, creating significant uncertainty.
Potential Mitigations:
- Conduct independent research on real estate costs in the target market.
- Consult with local real estate professionals to obtain realistic estimates.
- Secure financing pre-approval based on estimated real estate costs.
FDD Citations:
- Item 6: "We are unable to estimate the cost of real property acquisition or leasing which will vary substantially..."
Legal & Contract Risks
3 risks identified
1
1
1
Superseding State Law
Medium
Explanation:
- Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement, creating potential conflicts and uncertainties.
- Court decisions can also override the agreement, adding another layer of legal complexity.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the FIPA and relevant case law with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law.
- Ensure the franchise agreement explicitly addresses potential conflicts with state law and includes provisions for resolving discrepancies.
- Negotiate favorable terms in the franchise agreement that comply with Washington law.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit C-1, Washington Addendum: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions...Franchise agreement provisions, including those summarized in Item 17...are subject to state law."
Mandatory Washington Jurisdiction
Low
Explanation:
- Disputes related to franchises purchased in Washington may be subject to mandatory arbitration, mediation, or litigation within Washington state, potentially increasing travel and legal costs for franchisees outside the state.
Potential Mitigations:
- Factor in potential travel and legal costs associated with Washington jurisdiction when evaluating the franchise opportunity.
- Negotiate alternative dispute resolution mechanisms in the franchise agreement, if possible.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit C-1, Washington Addendum: "Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation" section.
Voiding of Certain Releases and Waivers
High
Explanation:
- Releases or waivers of rights under the FIPA are generally void, except in specific circumstances involving negotiated settlements with independent counsel.
- This limits the franchisor's ability to protect itself from certain claims and increases potential legal exposure.
Potential Mitigations:
- Ensure any releases or waivers are executed in strict compliance with RCW 19.100.220(2) with independent legal counsel.
- Understand the limitations on waivers and releases under Washington law.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit C-1, Washington Addendum: "General Release" section.
Territory & Competition Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
No Exclusive Territory
High
Explanation:
- The FDD explicitly states no exclusive territories are granted. This exposes franchisees to direct competition from other ECHO Suites, company-owned locations, and even other brands under the franchisor's control. This significantly increases the risk of market saturation and cannibalization, impacting revenue potential.
- Competition can come from "adjacent, adjoining or proximate" locations, intensifying the pressure.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully negotiate the Protected Territory to encompass a realistically defensible market area. Push for the largest possible area based on market demographics, travel patterns, and local competition.
- Thoroughly research existing and planned hotel developments in the broader region, not just the Protected Territory, to understand the competitive landscape.
- Develop a strong local marketing strategy to build brand recognition and customer loyalty within the Protected Territory.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "You will not receive an exclusive territory. You may face competition from other franchisees, from outlets that we own or manage, or from other channels of distribution or competitive brands that we control."
- Item 12: "These competitive outlets could be adjacent, adjoining or proximate to your Chain Facility."
Limited Protected Territory
Medium
Explanation:
- While a Protected Territory is offered, the FDD provides no guarantee of its size or effectiveness. The franchisor retains broad discretion in defining its boundaries, which may not adequately shield the franchisee from competition.
- The FDD states, "There is no minimum Protected Territory that we offer." This raises concerns about the practical value of the protection.
- Existing franchised locations within the Protected Territory can be renewed, expanded, or replaced, potentially increasing competition even within the designated area.
Potential Mitigations:
- Aggressively negotiate the Protected Territory boundaries during the pre-signing phase. Present compelling data on market demographics, competitor locations, and projected growth to justify a larger area.
- Consult with an experienced franchise attorney to review the Protected Territory provisions and ensure they offer reasonable protection.
- Clearly understand the criteria used by the franchisor to define Protected Territories and how they evaluate potential competitive threats.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "There is no minimum Protected Territory that we offer."
- Item 12: "any Chain Facility located within the Protected Territory when your Franchise Agreement becomes effective may have its franchise renewed or reissued, expanded for additional guest rooms or…replaced with a replacement Chain Facility having not more than 120% of the guest rooms of the replaced Chain Facility."
Competition from Affiliated Brands
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor and its affiliates may operate other lodging brands, timeshares, and similar businesses in the same trading area. This creates potential competition from related entities, even outside the Protected Territory.
- The FDD mentions the possibility of future acquisitions of hotel chains, further increasing the risk of intra-brand competition.
Potential Mitigations:
- Research the franchisor's portfolio of brands and their presence in the target market. Assess the potential for overlap and competition.
- Inquire about the franchisor's future acquisition plans and how they might impact the competitive landscape.
- Differentiate the ECHO Suites brand through superior service, amenities, and local marketing efforts.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "Our affiliates may own, manage or franchise in your trading area…lodging facilities, or…timeshare resorts, vacation or residence clubs, fractional ownership residences, condominiums, apartment buildings or the like."
- Item 12: "WHR or Wyndham Hotel Group may acquire additional hotel chains in the future which have company owned/operated or franchised properties in your trading area."
Regulatory & Compliance Risks
6 risks identified
2
3
1
Unilateral Conflict Resolution and Discretion
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that any conflicts between the franchisor and franchisee will be resolved under the Franchise Agreement, but the franchisor has "no procedure" for resolving conflicts with franchisees of other brands. Furthermore, conflict resolution regarding territory, customers, and support services is "entirely within [the franchisor's] discretion." This creates a significant power imbalance and exposes franchisees to potentially unfair outcomes with no recourse.
- This lack of a clear and neutral conflict resolution process, especially concerning other brands within the franchisor's portfolio, raises serious concerns about favoritism and potential disadvantages for ECHO Suites franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the Franchise Agreement for specific dispute resolution clauses and ensure they provide some level of fairness and protection for the franchisee.
- Negotiate for more balanced conflict resolution mechanisms, potentially involving third-party mediation or arbitration.
- Seek legal counsel specializing in franchising to assess the risks and potential implications of this unilateral discretion.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1 and Item 63: "Any conflicts between you and us regarding territory, customers and our support will be resolved under the Franchise Agreement. We have no procedure for resolving conflicts between you and franchisees of other brands. However, any resolution of any conflicts regarding territory, customers or support services will be entirely within our discretion."
Competition from Affiliated Brands and Prioritization of Chain Facilities
High
Explanation:
- The FDD discloses that the franchisor's affiliates operate other lodging facilities, including franchised hotels, which may compete with ECHO Suites franchisees. The franchisor also prioritizes its "Chain Facilities" in its reservation system, potentially diverting customers away from ECHO Suites locations.
- This internal competition and preferential treatment of other brands could significantly impact the occupancy rates and revenue of ECHO Suites franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly analyze the market presence and performance of the franchisor's other brands in the target territory.
- Negotiate for specific provisions in the Franchise Agreement that address potential conflicts of interest and ensure fair access to the reservation system.
- Develop a strong local marketing strategy to differentiate the ECHO Suites franchise from competing brands.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1 and Item 63: "Our affiliates may own, manage or franchise in your trading area… We will prioritize Chain Facilities over other hotels…"
Lack of Compensation for Franchisor's Direct Sales
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD indicates that franchisees receive no compensation for reservations booked through the franchisor's distribution channels (CRS, call center, websites, etc.) unless the reservation is made specifically on the franchisee's behalf.
- This could lead to lost revenue opportunities for franchisees, as the franchisor's direct booking channels may capture a significant portion of the market.
Potential Mitigations:
- Clarify the revenue sharing model for direct bookings and negotiate for a more equitable arrangement.
- Develop a robust online presence and booking platform to capture direct bookings independently.
- Explore alternative marketing and distribution channels to reduce reliance on the franchisor's system.
FDD Citations:
- Item 63: "You will receive no compensation for our sales through our distribution channels, unless we make a reservation on your behalf…"
Potential for Future Acquisitions and Increased Competition
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD states that the franchisor (WHR or Wyndham Hotel Group) may acquire additional hotel chains in the future, which could introduce new competing brands into the franchisee's territory.
- This potential for increased competition from within the franchisor's portfolio could negatively impact market share and profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Assess the franchisor's acquisition history and strategy to understand the likelihood of future acquisitions and their potential impact.
- Include provisions in the Franchise Agreement that address potential conflicts of interest arising from future acquisitions.
- Focus on building a strong brand identity and customer loyalty to mitigate the impact of new competitors.
FDD Citations:
- Item 63: "WHR or Wyndham Hotel Group may acquire additional hotel chains in the future which have company owned/operated or franchised properties in your trading area."
Reliance on Franchisor's Reservation System
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD highlights the franchisee's dependence on the franchisor's Central Reservation System (CRS) and other distribution channels for bookings. This reliance creates a vulnerability if there are issues with the CRS or if the franchisor's marketing efforts are ineffective.
Potential Mitigations:
- Evaluate the reliability and performance of the franchisor's CRS and other booking platforms.
- Develop a diversified marketing strategy that includes local partnerships and online marketing efforts to generate bookings independently.
- Negotiate for service level agreements related to the CRS and other essential services provided by the franchisor.
FDD Citations:
- Item 63: "We provide information about and book reservations for hotels… through the CRS; call center; digital agents…"
Limited Financial History of Franchisor
Low
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions Item 3 and Item 4 related to bankruptcy disclosures and financial statements. While the provided excerpt doesn't indicate specific financial concerns, the fact that ECHO Suites was founded in 2022 suggests a limited operating history. This lack of historical financial data can make it difficult to assess the franchisor's long-term financial stability and ability to support its franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements (Item 8 and referenced sections) to assess their current financial health.
- Request additional financial information and projections from the franchisor.
- Consult with a financial advisor to evaluate the franchisor's financial viability.
FDD Citations:
- Item 3 and Item 4: Referenced in the provided FDD excerpt.
- Item 8: "The financial statements required… are appended to this Annual Report on Form 10-K."
Franchisor Support Risks
6 risks identified
2
3
1
Mandatory PMS System Dependence
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor mandates a specific PMS system (OPERA), creating vendor lock-in and potential issues with cost increases, lack of flexibility, and dependence on a single provider. A change in PMS systems later could be disruptive and costly.
- The FDD doesn't specify whether the franchisor receives rebates or incentives from the PMS vendor, raising concerns about potential conflicts of interest.
- The mention of "additional interface fees" for optional interfaces lacks transparency and could lead to unexpected costs.
Potential Mitigations:
- Negotiate a fixed-price contract with the PMS vendor for a set period to mitigate potential price increases.
- Thoroughly research the OPERA PMS system, including its features, limitations, and user reviews, to understand its suitability for your business.
- Inquire about the franchisor's relationship with the PMS vendor and any potential financial incentives they receive.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: "You must purchase, lease or otherwise acquire the computerized hospitality property management system/computer (“PMS”) that has been designated by us."
- Item 11: "This range includes the set-up and remote installation costs for the OPERA foundation PMS."
- Item 11: "This range does not include additional interface fees which may be required based on optional interfaces you may utilize at the Facility."
Limited FF&E Flexibility
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor's requirement to use their approved interior design package limits flexibility and potentially increases costs. Franchisees may not be able to leverage local suppliers or negotiate better pricing.
- The FDD lacks details about the specific items included in the design package and their associated costs, making it difficult to accurately estimate expenses.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request a detailed breakdown of the approved interior design package, including specific items, costs, and supplier information.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for some flexibility in sourcing FF&E, especially for non-branded items.
- Compare the franchisor's pricing with independent suppliers to assess the competitiveness of their offering.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "The estimate presumes that you will install our approved interior design package in all guest rooms and public areas."
Signage Cost Uncertainty
Medium
Explanation:
- The estimated signage costs are vague and subject to significant variation based on local regulations, labor costs, and other factors. This uncertainty makes budgeting and financial planning challenging.
Potential Mitigations:
- Obtain detailed quotes from local signage vendors to get a more accurate estimate of costs.
- Consult with local authorities to understand signage regulations and permitting requirements.
- Request clarification from the franchisor on the specific factors that influence signage costs.
FDD Citations:
- Item 13: "Your actual cost will depend on many variables including sign size, materials and height, distance signs must be shipped, local labor costs and local ordinances."
OS&E Cost Variability and Potential Upselling
Medium
Explanation:
- The wide range provided for OS&E costs creates uncertainty and raises concerns about potential upselling of optional items. The FDD doesn't clearly distinguish between required and optional items.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request a detailed list of required OS&E items and their associated costs.
- Carefully evaluate the need for optional/suggested items and resist pressure to purchase unnecessary items.
- Compare the franchisor's pricing for OS&E with independent suppliers.
FDD Citations:
- Item 14: "The low end of the range assumes you will purchase the required OS&E to open in compliance with System Standards. The high end of the range assumes you have chosen to purchase optional/suggested items not required by System Standards…"
Limited Franchisor Operating History
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor was founded in 2022, indicating limited operating history and a lack of proven track record. This increases the risk of unforeseen challenges and potential failures in their support systems and business model.
- The lack of historical financial performance data makes it difficult to assess the long-term viability and profitability of the franchise.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the franchisor's management team and their experience in the hospitality industry.
- Speak with existing franchisees (if any) to gather feedback on their experience with the franchisor's support and performance.
- Seek professional advice from experienced franchise consultants and legal counsel.
FDD Citations:
- General FDD Review: Franchisor founded in 2022.
Lack of Clarity on Financial Statements
Low
Explanation:
- While the FDD mentions financial statements being appended to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, the provided excerpt doesn't offer direct access or a summary of the franchisor's financial health. This makes it difficult to assess the franchisor's financial stability and ability to provide ongoing support.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the complete FDD, including the appended financial statements, to assess the franchisor's financial performance and stability.
- Consult with a financial advisor to analyze the franchisor's financial statements and identify any potential red flags.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "The financial statements required to be filed pursuant to this Item 8 are appended to this Annual Report on Form 10-K."
Exit & Transfer Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Restrictive Contract Terms Superseded by State Law
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions several instances where Washington state law (RCW 19.100.180) may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement, particularly regarding termination, renewal, and other key aspects of the franchise relationship. This creates uncertainty about the enforceability of certain contract terms and could lead to disputes.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchise agreement with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law to identify any clauses that might be superseded by state law.
- Negotiate with the franchisor to amend or remove potentially problematic clauses to ensure alignment with Washington law.
- Obtain written clarification from the franchisor regarding the interpretation and enforceability of specific contract terms in light of Washington law.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit C-1, Franchisee Bill of Rights: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise."
Limited Transferability Due to State Law Restrictions
Medium
Explanation:
- Washington state law places limitations on transfer fees and certain buy-back provisions, potentially affecting the franchisee's ability to sell or transfer the franchise in the future. Transfer fees must reflect reasonable costs, and buy-back provisions without franchisee consent are generally unlawful unless for good cause.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review the franchise agreement's provisions on transfer fees and buy-back options.
- Consult with a franchise attorney to understand the implications of Washington law on these provisions.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for more favorable terms regarding transferability, if possible.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit C-1, Transfer Fees: "Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor’s reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer."
- Exhibit C-1, Certain Buy-Back Provisions: "Provisions in franchise agreements or related agreements that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee’s business for any reason during the term of the franchise agreement without the franchisee’s consent are unlawful pursuant to RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless the franchise is terminated for good cause."
Risk of Litigation in Washington State
Low
Explanation:
- The FDD specifies Washington as the likely jurisdiction for any legal disputes, which could be inconvenient and costly for franchisees located outside of Washington.
Potential Mitigations:
- Factor in potential travel and legal costs associated with litigating in Washington state.
- Consult with legal counsel in Washington to understand the legal landscape and potential implications.
- Consider negotiating with the franchisor for alternative dispute resolution mechanisms.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit C-1, Site of Arbitration, Mediation, and/or Litigation: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon at the time of the arbitration or mediation…"
Operational & Brand Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Mandatory PMS System Dependency
Medium
Explanation:
- Franchisees are required to use a specific PMS system designated by the franchisor. This creates a dependency on the provider and potential issues if the system fails, becomes obsolete, or the provider increases prices or goes out of business.
- Lack of flexibility in choosing a PMS that best suits the franchisee's needs and budget.
- Potential incompatibility with other software used by the franchisee.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the designated PMS system, including its features, reliability, and support. Negotiate favorable terms with the provider.
- Inquire about the franchisor's plans for future PMS upgrades and compatibility.
- Explore backup solutions and contingency plans in case of system failure.
FDD Citations:
- Item 6, Exhibit A: "You must purchase, lease or otherwise acquire the computerized hospitality property management system/computer (“PMS”) that has been designated by us."
- Item 11: (Referencing the need to review Item 11 for further details on the PMS).
Brand Consistency Enforcement & Design Package Costs
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor mandates a specific interior design package, potentially increasing costs and limiting franchisee flexibility in design choices.
- The estimated costs for FF&E do not include tax, freight, or installation, which could lead to significant budget overruns.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the required design package and obtain detailed quotes for all components, including tax, freight, and installation.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for potential cost savings or flexibility in design choices.
- Explore alternative suppliers while ensuring compliance with brand standards.
FDD Citations:
- Item 6, Exhibit A: "These items are typically driven by the decorative furnishings package. The estimate presumes that you will install our approved interior design package..."
- Item 6, Exhibit A: "The figures above do not include tax, freight or installation, which should be confirmed prior to purchasing."
Signage Cost Uncertainty
Low
Explanation:
- The estimated signage costs are highly variable and depend on several factors, including size, materials, local labor costs, and ordinances.
- The estimates do not include local taxes and permits, which could add significant expense.
Potential Mitigations:
- Obtain detailed quotes from multiple signage vendors based on specific local requirements.
- Factor in potential cost variations and include a contingency buffer in the budget.
- Research local signage ordinances and permit requirements early in the process.
FDD Citations:
- Item 6, Exhibit A: "Your actual cost will depend on many variables including sign size, materials and height..."
- Item 6, Exhibit A: "This cost does not include local taxes and permits."
Performance & ROI Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
No Guaranteed Revenue Projections
High
Explanation:
- Item 17.7.4 explicitly states that no salesperson has provided any promises or information about projected sales, revenues, income, or profits, except as stated in Item 19. This lack of guaranteed financial projections creates significant uncertainty about the potential return on investment.
- Without reliable projections, it's difficult to assess the feasibility and profitability of the franchise, making it challenging to secure financing and develop a realistic business plan.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully analyze Item 19 for any available financial performance representations. Understand the limitations and disclaimers associated with these representations.
- Conduct independent market research to assess the local demand for extended-stay accommodations and estimate potential revenue based on occupancy rates, average daily rates, and operating expenses.
- Consult with experienced hospitality industry professionals and financial advisors to develop realistic financial projections and evaluate the investment's viability.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17.7.4: "You acknowledge that no salesperson has made any promise or provided any information to you about actual or projected sales... except as stated in Item 19."
Force Majeure Impact on Performance
Medium
Explanation:
- While Force Majeure clauses are standard, Item 17.8 outlines events that could significantly disrupt operations and impact revenue, such as natural disasters, strikes, and legal restrictions. The clause protects the franchisor from liability but doesn't shield the franchisee from financial losses.
- Recurring fees and other payments are still due even during a Force Majeure event, unless prohibited by a governmental or judicial order. This could strain finances during periods of reduced or no revenue.
Potential Mitigations:
- Secure comprehensive business interruption insurance to cover potential losses during Force Majeure events.
- Develop a contingency plan outlining procedures for managing operations and mitigating financial impact during unforeseen disruptions.
- Carefully review the Force Majeure clause to understand its scope and limitations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17.8: "Neither you nor we shall be liable for loss or damage... if the failure to perform obligations results from... windstorms, rains, floods... fires, strikes... legal restrictions..."
- Item 17.8: "...no such cause shall excuse payment of amounts owed... other than a governmental or judicial order prohibiting such payments."
No Offset Against Fees
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 17.9 prohibits franchisees from withholding or offsetting any amounts allegedly due from the franchisor against recurring fees or other fees. This limits the franchisee's recourse in disputes and could lead to financial hardship if legitimate claims are unresolved.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchise agreement and understand the dispute resolution process.
- Seek legal counsel to negotiate favorable terms regarding fee offsets in specific circumstances.
- Maintain open communication with the franchisor and address any concerns promptly to prevent disputes from escalating.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17.9: "You acknowledge and agree that you will not withhold or offset any liquidated or unliquidated amounts... against any Recurring Fees."
FDD Documents by Year
Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents
FDD Year: 2025
Uploaded: 8/9/2025
FDD Year: 2024
Uploaded: 8/26/2025
FDD Documents
Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year