Country Inn & Suites by Radisson logo

    Country Inn & Suites by Radisson

    Hospitality
    Founded 1986419 locations
    Company Profile
    Year Founded:1986

    Country Inn & Suites by Radisson Franchise Cost

    Franchise Fee:$50,000Key Metric
    Total Investment:$808,000 - $3,380,000Key Metric
    Liquid Capital:$292,500
    Royalty Fee:6% of gross sales
    Marketing Fee:4% of gross sales
    Quick ROI Calculator
    Based on Country Inn & Suites by Radisson's actual financial data
    Outlet Counts by Year
    Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
    Total US Locations:419

    Scale relative to 1,000 locations

    Franchised Units:416
    Corporate Units:3
    Additional Information

    Processing Franchise Details

    Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.

    Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.

    Search Interests & Trends

    Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis

    Search Interest & Trends

    No Trends Data Available

    Trend analysis data for Country Inn & Suites by Radisson is being collected. Check back soon for insights.

    AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis

    Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.

    13
    High Risk
    Critical items
    25% of total
    26
    Medium Risk
    Monitor closely
    50% of total
    13
    Low Risk
    Manageable items
    25% of total
    52
    Total Items
    Factors analyzed
    10 categories
    5.00
    Overall Score
    Low RiskHigh Risk
    010

    Franchisor Stability Risks

    5 risks identified

    1
    3
    1

    Declining Franchise Outlet Count

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 1 shows a consistent decline in the total number of Country Inn & Suites by Radisson outlets from 447 in 2022 to 419 in 2024. This trend, while not drastic, suggests potential challenges within the franchise system, such as declining brand appeal, increased competition, or operational difficulties faced by franchisees.
    • A shrinking system can lead to reduced brand recognition, diminished economies of scale in purchasing and marketing, and potentially lower support levels for franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly investigate the reasons behind the decline. Analyze the specific causes of terminations, non-renewals, and ceased operations (detailed in Table 3). Identify if there are systemic issues or if they are isolated incidents.
    • Evaluate the franchisor's strategies for attracting new franchisees and retaining existing ones. Assess the effectiveness of their marketing and support programs.
    • Compare the decline rate with industry averages and competitor performance to understand the relative health of the brand.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 1: "Systemwide Outlet Summary For Years 2022 to 2024" shows a decreasing number of total outlets.

    Potential for Intra-Brand Competition

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 1 discloses that the franchisor grants franchises for numerous hotel brands and reserves the right to operate these brands at any location. This creates the potential for direct competition between Country Inn & Suites by Radisson franchisees and other brands owned or franchised by the same parent company (Choice Hotels).
    • This competition could negatively impact a franchisee's market share and profitability, especially if the franchisor prioritizes other brands in the same market.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the Franchise Agreement for any provisions related to territorial exclusivity or protection against encroachment by other brands within the Choice Hotels portfolio.
    • Analyze the market presence of other Choice Hotels brands in your target area to assess the potential for direct competition.
    • Discuss with existing franchisees their experiences with intra-brand competition and the franchisor's approach to managing such situations.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 1: "We have the right to operate and franchise these hotels at any location... and you may compete with any of our brands... Those hotels could be company-owned, franchised, or both."

    Franchisee Transfers and Turnover

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 2 details the number of franchise transfers. While the numbers are not excessively high, a significant number of transfers could indicate underlying issues within the franchise system, such as franchisee dissatisfaction, financial difficulties, or operational challenges.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Investigate the reasons behind the transfers. Contact existing and former franchisees to understand their motivations for selling or transferring their franchises.
    • Compare the transfer rate with industry averages to assess if the turnover is within acceptable limits.
    • Analyze the financial performance of transferred units compared to the system average to identify any potential red flags.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 2: "Transfers of Outlets From Franchisees to New Owners" provides data on the number of transfers.

    Limited Disclosure on Reasons for Outlet Changes

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • While Item 20, Table 3 provides information on the status of franchised outlets, including openings, terminations, and non-renewals, it lacks detailed explanations for these changes. Understanding the specific reasons for terminations and non-renewals is crucial for assessing the health and stability of the franchise system.
    • The "Ceased Operations Other Reasons" category lacks transparency and could mask underlying problems.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request further clarification from the franchisor regarding the reasons behind terminations, non-renewals, and the specific circumstances categorized as "Ceased Operations Other Reasons."
    • Contact existing and former franchisees to gain insights into their experiences and the challenges they may have faced.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 3: "Status of Franchised Outlets" provides data on outlet changes but lacks detailed explanations.

    Parent Company's Broad Brand Portfolio and Resource Allocation

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 1 reveals that the franchisor (Choice Hotels) manages a large portfolio of hotel brands. While this can offer diversification benefits, it also raises concerns about resource allocation and potential prioritization of certain brands over others. Country Inn & Suites by Radisson franchisees could face disadvantages if the parent company shifts its focus and resources towards newer or higher-performing brands.
    • The FDD states there are no physically separate offices or training facilities for the various brands, which could lead to diluted support and less specialized expertise for each individual brand.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about the franchisor's long-term strategy for the Country Inn & Suites by Radisson brand and its relative importance within the overall portfolio.
    • Seek assurances regarding dedicated support and resources for the brand, despite the shared infrastructure with other brands.
    • Assess the financial performance and growth trajectory of other Choice Hotels brands to understand potential resource allocation priorities.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 1: Lists numerous hotel brands under the franchisor's control, indicating a large and diverse portfolio.
    • Item 1: "We do not maintain physically separate offices or training facilities for the other Choice brands."

    Disclosure & Representation Risks

    4 risks identified

    1
    2
    1

    Personal Guaranty Risk

    High

    Explanation:

    • The requirement for each franchise owner to execute a personal guaranty exposes personal assets to significant risk in case of business failure. This is particularly concerning in community property states like California, where a non-owner spouse's assets are also at risk.
    • This could lead to significant financial hardship for the franchisee and their family, extending beyond the business investment itself.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the personal guaranty agreement with legal counsel specializing in franchise law and community property.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to limit the scope or duration of the personal guaranty, if possible.
    • Consider structuring ownership through a separate legal entity to potentially shield personal assets, though this may not fully eliminate the risk depending on the specific terms of the guaranty.
    • Ensure the spouse fully understands the implications of the personal guaranty before signing any agreements.

    FDD Citations:

    • Exhibit A - California Addendum: "Each owner of the franchise is required to execute a personal guaranty. Doing so could jeopardize the marital assets of non-owner spouses domiciled in community property states such as California."

    Lack of State Review of Website Information

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states that the franchisor's website has not been reviewed or approved by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. This raises concerns about the accuracy and completeness of information presented on the website, which potential franchisees may rely on during their decision-making process.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Do not solely rely on the website information. Cross-reference information with the FDD and other independent sources.
    • Directly ask the franchisor for clarification on any discrepancies or unclear information found on the website.
    • Consult with a franchise attorney to review the FDD and other relevant materials before making any decisions.

    FDD Citations:

    • Exhibit A - California Addendum: "OUR WEBSITE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION."

    Material Modification Disclosure Requirement

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD highlights the requirement for the franchisor to provide a disclosure document approved by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation before soliciting any material modification to an existing franchise agreement. This indicates potential future changes to the franchise relationship, which could impact the franchisee's business operations and profitability.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review any proposed modifications to the franchise agreement with legal counsel.
    • Assess the potential impact of these modifications on your business operations and financial projections.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to address any concerns regarding the proposed modifications.

    FDD Citations:

    • Exhibit A - California Addendum: "CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE, SECTION 31125 REQUIRES CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. TO GIVE YOU A DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION PRIOR TO A SOLICITATION OF A PROPOSED MATERIAL MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING FRANCHISE."

    Lack of State Endorsement

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The FDD explicitly states that registration of the franchise does not constitute approval, recommendation, or endorsement by the Commissioner. This clarifies that the state's registration is purely administrative and does not guarantee the franchise's quality or success.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct thorough independent due diligence to assess the franchise opportunity, including financial performance, market analysis, and legal review.
    • Do not rely solely on the state's registration as an indicator of the franchise's viability.

    FDD Citations:

    • Exhibit A - California Addendum: "Registration of this franchise does not constitute approval, recommendation, or endorsement by the Commissioner."

    Financial & Fee Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Mandatory Hardware and Software Costs

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD mandates the purchase of Dell hardware through specific vendors (Insight or Choice) and the choiceADVANTAGE® system, potentially limiting flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
    • The mandatory refresh every 48 months or upon warranty expiration, with estimated costs between $3,800 and $10,800, represents a recurring expense that could significantly impact profitability, especially with no cap on frequency or cost.
    • The required purchase of a software license for choiceADVANTAGE® and a dedicated high-speed internet connection adds to the initial and ongoing technology expenses.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully evaluate the cost-benefit of the mandatory hardware and software package compared to alternative solutions.
    • Negotiate favorable pricing and terms with the designated vendors.
    • Budget for the recurring hardware refresh costs and explore options for extending the lifespan of existing equipment.
    • Factor in the cost of high-speed internet access and software licenses in the financial projections.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 5: "You are required to purchase the mandatory Dell hardware package through our preferred hardware vendor, Insight or through Choice…"
    • Item 7: "You must purchase from us a software license to onboard and use choiceADVANTAGE®. You also must purchase the mandatory hardware package…"
    • Item 7: "You are required to use a designated Qualified Vendor to purchase and install a dedicated, wired, business grade High Speed Internet Access solution…"
    • Item 11: (Referenced but not provided)

    Data Access and Usage by Franchisor

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Choice Hotels has independent access to data generated by the choiceADVANTAGE® system, raising potential privacy and competitive concerns.
    • While the stated purpose is to identify trends and improve brand standards, the franchisor's access to detailed operational data could be perceived as intrusive.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Review the franchise agreement and privacy policy carefully to understand the scope of data access and usage by the franchisor.
    • Inquire about data security measures and protocols to ensure the confidentiality of sensitive information.

    FDD Citations:

    • FDD Introduction: "We will have independent access to the information that will be generated by the choiceADVANTAGE® property management system…"

    Limited NSF Check Service Charge

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Minnesota Statute 604.113 limits NSF check service charges to $30, potentially impacting revenue recovery from returned checks.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Implement strict check acceptance policies and procedures to minimize the risk of NSF checks.
    • Consider alternative payment methods to reduce reliance on checks.
    • Be aware of and comply with state regulations regarding NSF check fees.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 6: "NSF checks are governed by Minn. Stat. 604.113, which puts a cap of $30 on service charges."

    Legal & Contract Risks

    3 risks identified

    2
    1

    Superseding State Law (WA)

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) may supersede the franchise agreement, creating potential conflicts and uncertainties regarding termination, renewal, and other key aspects of the franchise relationship.
    • Court decisions can also supersede the agreement, adding another layer of legal complexity.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchise agreement alongside RCW 19.100 (WA FIPA) with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law to identify and understand any potential conflicts or discrepancies.
    • Seek clarification from the franchisor regarding how they address potential conflicts between the agreement and Washington state law.
    • Consider the potential impact of future legal changes in Washington on the franchise relationship.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 2: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement...concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise."
    • Item 2: "There may also be court decisions that supersede the franchise agreement..."

    Mandatory Arbitration/Litigation Venue (WA)

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Disputes may be required to be arbitrated or litigated in Washington state, potentially increasing travel and legal costs for franchisees located elsewhere.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Factor in potential travel and legal expenses associated with dispute resolution in Washington state when evaluating the franchise opportunity.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to establish a mutually agreeable venue for dispute resolution, although this may not be possible.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 3: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon..."

    Invalidity of Certain Release/Waiver Provisions (WA)

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Certain releases or waivers of rights under the Washington FIPA are void, limiting the franchisor's ability to enforce certain provisions and potentially increasing the risk of litigation.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Review the franchise agreement with legal counsel to ensure compliance with RCW 19.100.220(2) regarding valid releases and waivers.
    • Understand the limitations on waivers under Washington law to avoid inadvertently agreeing to unenforceable provisions.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 4: "A release or waiver of rights...purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act...is void except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement..."

    Territory & Competition Risks

    7 risks identified

    3
    3
    1

    No Exclusive Territory

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD explicitly states no exclusive territory is granted. This means other Country Inn & Suites, or even other Choice Hotels brands, could be located nearby, increasing competition and potentially cannibalizing your customer base.
    • This is particularly concerning given the wide range of Choice Hotels brands, from budget-friendly to upscale, covering a broad spectrum of the market.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly research the existing hotel landscape in your target area, including all Choice Hotels brands and competitors. Identify potential market saturation or underserved segments.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor for a preferred region or exclusive territory, understanding that these are not guaranteed and can be revoked. Highlight your experience and proposed investment to strengthen your case.
    • Develop a strong local marketing strategy to differentiate your hotel and build a loyal customer base.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "We grant franchises for specific sites only. You will not receive an exclusive territory."
    • Item 12: "We expressly reserve the right to grant franchises or open company owned hotels at any location under any brand name other than the location specified in your Franchise Agreement."

    Competition from Other Choice Hotels Brands

    High

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor operates numerous hotel brands, many of which could directly or indirectly compete with your Country Inn & Suites. This internal competition could limit market share and profitability.
    • The FDD states the franchisor has the right to franchise any of its brands in any location, regardless of your franchise agreement.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully analyze the market positioning of all Choice Hotels brands in your target area. Identify potential overlaps and competitive advantages.
    • Focus on differentiating your services and amenities to appeal to a specific niche within the broader market.
    • Leverage the Choice Hotels loyalty program and marketing resources to attract customers, while also developing your own local marketing initiatives.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "We may open company-owned hotels under any brand and offer hotel franchises for upscale, mid-priced and budget hotels under any of the Choice Marks."
    • Item 12: "We have the right to operate and franchise these hotels at any location in accordance with the terms of your Franchise Agreement and you may compete with any of our brands in the operation of your Hotel."

    Competition from Company-Owned Hotels

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor reserves the right to open company-owned hotels, potentially in direct competition with your franchised location. This could create an uneven playing field, as the franchisor may prioritize its own hotels.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about the franchisor's plans for company-owned hotels in your target area. While they may not disclose specific plans, understanding their overall strategy can inform your decision.
    • Focus on providing exceptional customer service and maintaining high quality standards to compete effectively.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "We may open company-owned hotels under any brand and offer hotel franchises for upscale, mid-priced and budget hotels under any of the Choice Marks."

    Alternative Distribution Channels

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor utilizes various distribution channels, including online platforms and direct marketing. While you won't be compensated for bookings made through these channels unless they are on your behalf, these channels could potentially divert customers away from your direct booking channels.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Actively manage your online presence and optimize your website for search engines to attract direct bookings.
    • Offer competitive rates and promotions to incentivize customers to book directly.
    • Leverage local marketing and partnerships to drive direct bookings.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "We may take reservations for rooms through any method of distribution...You will receive no compensation for our sales through Alternative Distribution Channels, unless we make a reservation on your behalf."

    No Right of First Refusal for Additional Franchises

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states that franchisees are not typically granted rights of first refusal for additional franchises. This means if you wish to expand your business in the future, you may face competition from other potential franchisees for desirable locations.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Maintain a strong relationship with the franchisor and express your interest in future expansion opportunities.
    • Continuously monitor the market for potential new locations.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "Customarily, we do not grant to franchisees options, rights of first refusal or similar rights to acquire additional franchises."

    Loss of Preferred Region/Exclusive Territory due to Default

    Medium

    Explanation:

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Diligently adhere to all terms of the franchise agreement, including maintaining quality standards and paying fees on time.
    • Establish robust operational procedures and financial controls to minimize the risk of default.
    • Maintain open communication with the franchisor and address any potential issues promptly.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "Our grant of a preferred region or exclusive territory can be terminated by us if you default under your Franchise Agreement, including failing to maintain quality standards or failing to pay franchise fees due on a timely basis."

    Competition from Other Hotel Brands

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD acknowledges competition from other hotel brands, which is inherent in the hospitality industry. This competition can come from established national chains, regional players, or independent hotels.
    • This competition can impact pricing strategies, occupancy rates, and overall profitability.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct thorough market research to identify your key competitors and their strengths and weaknesses.
    • Develop a clear brand positioning and value proposition that differentiates your hotel from the competition.
    • Implement effective revenue management strategies to optimize pricing and occupancy.
    • Focus on providing excellent customer service and building a strong reputation in the local market.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "You may face competition from...other competitive brands."

    Regulatory & Compliance Risks

    6 risks identified

    2
    3
    1

    Intense Competition within Brand Family

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 1 discloses a large number of brands operated and franchised by Choice Hotels. This creates a high risk of intra-brand competition, where franchisees of one Choice brand directly compete with other Choice brands, potentially cannibalizing market share and impacting profitability.
    • The FDD states "you may compete with any of our brands in the operation of your Hotel. Those hotels could be company-owned, franchised, or both." This explicitly acknowledges the potential for direct competition from within the Choice Hotels system.
    • Lack of physically separate offices or training facilities for competing brands may exacerbate resource allocation issues and create conflicts of interest.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully analyze the market area for existing and planned Choice Hotels brands to assess the level of potential competition.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor for territorial protections or exclusive development rights within a specific geographic area.
    • Clearly understand the franchisor's strategy for managing intra-brand competition and resource allocation.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 1: "We currently grant franchises for hotels operated under the following brands...We have the right to operate and franchise these hotels at any location...you may compete with any of our brands...We do not maintain physically separate offices or training facilities for the other Choice brands that may compete with your Hotel."

    Financial Dependence on Loyalty Program

    High

    Explanation:

    • The auditor's report in Item 8 highlights the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program as a "Critical Audit Matter." This indicates a significant level of complexity and judgment involved in accounting for the program, which increases the risk of misstatements or errors.
    • The substantial revenue and liability figures associated with the loyalty program ($123.2 million in revenue, $129.6 million point liability, and $110.4 million deferred revenue) demonstrate the company's significant financial dependence on the program's success.
    • Changes in redemption rates, program rules, or customer behavior could materially impact the company's financial performance.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly review the franchisor's loyalty program structure, accounting practices, and assumptions used in estimating liabilities.
    • Consult with an independent financial expert to assess the potential impact of changes in the loyalty program on franchisee profitability.
    • Develop strategies to attract and retain customers independent of the loyalty program, such as local marketing initiatives and personalized guest services.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: "Critical Audit Matter...Accounting for Choice Privileges Loyalty Program...The Company recognized $123.2 million in revenues from loyalty points redeemed...point liability and deferred revenue of $129.6 million and $110.4 million."

    Complexity of Loyalty Program Accounting

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The auditor's report highlights the complexity of the models and high volume of data used to monitor and account for the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program. This complexity increases the risk of errors or misstatements in financial reporting, which could impact franchisee royalties and fees.
    • The difficulty in estimating future redemption rates introduces uncertainty into the financial projections related to the loyalty program.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request detailed information from the franchisor about the loyalty program's accounting methodology and assumptions.
    • Consult with an independent accountant specializing in loyalty programs to assess the reliability of the franchisor's financial reporting.
    • Closely monitor the performance of the loyalty program and its impact on your hotel's revenue.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: "Auditing the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program results is complex due to: (1) the complexity of the models used and the high volume of data...; and (2) the complexity of estimating the future redemption rate."

    Dependence on Franchisor's Financial Performance

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD includes the franchisor's consolidated financial statements, which indicate the overall financial health of Choice Hotels International. A decline in the franchisor's financial performance could negatively impact their ability to support franchisees, invest in brand development, and provide essential services.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements and assess their financial stability and long-term viability.
    • Consult with a financial advisor to understand the potential implications of the franchisor's financial performance on your franchise investment.
    • Diversify your business interests to reduce reliance on a single franchisor.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8: "Consolidated Financial Statements"

    Potential Impact of Business Combination and Transition Costs

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The Consolidated Statements of Income in Item 8 show "Business combination, diligence and transition costs." These costs suggest recent or ongoing mergers, acquisitions, or restructuring activities within Choice Hotels. Such activities can create disruptions, divert resources, and potentially impact the franchisor's ability to effectively support franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about the nature and extent of any business combinations or transitions and their potential impact on franchise operations and support.
    • Assess the franchisor's track record in managing such transitions effectively.
    • Factor potential disruptions and uncertainties into your business plan.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8, Consolidated Statements of Income: "Business combination, diligence and transition costs"

    Risk of Brand Dilution

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The large number of brands operated by Choice Hotels (listed in Item 1) raises the risk of brand dilution. With so many brands under one umbrella, individual brand identities may become weakened, impacting customer recognition and loyalty.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Evaluate the strength and distinctiveness of the specific brand you are considering franchising.
    • Assess the franchisor's marketing and brand management strategies.
    • Focus on building local brand recognition through targeted marketing efforts.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 1: List of brands operated by Choice Hotels.

    Franchisor Support Risks

    7 risks identified

    2
    3
    2

    Limited Franchisor Support in Intellectual Property Disputes

    High

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor reserves the right to control all intellectual property disputes but is not obligated to defend the franchisee against claims arising from their use of franchised materials.
    • This exposes franchisees to potential legal and financial burdens if third-party infringement claims arise.
    • The franchisor's lack of obligation to take affirmative action against infringement could negatively impact the franchisee's brand and operations.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Negotiate stronger protections in the Franchise Agreement regarding IP dispute resolution and defense support.
    • Consult with an experienced franchise attorney to understand the implications of this limited support and explore potential legal remedies.
    • Secure additional insurance coverage to mitigate potential financial losses from IP disputes.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "We reserve the right to control any patent or copyright dispute...We are not obligated to protect any patent...or to defend you against claims arising from your use of any patented or copyrighted items."
    • Item 11: "We are not obligated to take any affirmative action when notified of any infringement."

    Mandatory Updates to Rules & Regulations at Franchisee's Expense

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Franchisees are required to comply with all changes to the Rules & Regulations at their own cost.
    • This can lead to unpredictable expenses and financial strain, especially if updates are frequent or substantial.
    • Lack of control over the timing and nature of these updates can disrupt operations and budgeting.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request a schedule or estimated frequency of updates to the Rules & Regulations.
    • Negotiate a cap on the annual cost of implementing mandatory updates.
    • Build a contingency fund to cover potential expenses related to these changes.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "You must comply with all changes to the Rules & Regulations at your cost."

    Franchisor Control over Proprietary Information and Limited Recourse for Unauthorized Use

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor retains strict control over all proprietary information, and while franchisees must report unauthorized use, the franchisor is not obligated to take action.
    • This lack of guaranteed action could leave franchisees vulnerable to brand damage and lost revenue if proprietary information is misused by third parties.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Clarify in writing the franchisor's process for handling reports of unauthorized use of proprietary information.
    • Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options in case of unauthorized use.
    • Implement strong internal security measures to protect proprietary information within your franchise.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "You must notify us immediately if you learn about an unauthorized use of proprietary information. We are not obligated to take action...".

    Complexity of Choice Privileges Loyalty Program Accounting

    High

    Explanation:

    • The auditor's report highlights the complexity of the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program accounting, including the use of complex models and significant estimates.
    • This complexity increases the risk of errors or misstatements in financial reporting, which could impact the franchisor's financial stability and potentially affect franchisee royalty payments or support.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements and related disclosures regarding the loyalty program.
    • Seek clarification from the franchisor on any aspects of the loyalty program accounting that are unclear.
    • Consult with a financial advisor to assess the potential impact of the loyalty program's financial performance on your franchise investment.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: "Critical Audit Matter: Accounting for Choice Privileges Loyalty Program...complex due to: (1) the complexity of the models used...; and (2) the complexity of estimating the future redemption rate."

    Reliance on Franchisor's Websites and Potential Restrictions

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Franchisees are likely reliant on the franchisor's websites for content and information, but the franchisor retains full control and restricts framing or incorporating website content without authorization.
    • This could limit the franchisee's flexibility in marketing and online presence.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Clarify permitted uses of website content and information in the Franchise Agreement.
    • Explore options for developing independent online marketing strategies.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "You may not frame or incorporate any content or information contained in our websites without our express written authorization."

    Confidentiality Requirements and Return of Proprietary Information

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Franchisees are required to maintain confidentiality of proprietary information and return all materials upon termination.
    • This is standard practice but could pose logistical challenges and potential costs associated with secure storage and return of materials.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Establish clear procedures for handling and storing proprietary information.
    • Factor in potential costs associated with returning materials upon termination.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "You must keep confidential...all proprietary information...Upon termination...you must return to us all proprietary information."

    No Material Determinations Regarding Copyrighted Materials (Except Franchise Agreement)

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states there are no currently effective material determinations regarding copyrighted materials except for the Franchise Agreement itself.
    • While not necessarily a risk in itself, this lack of explicit legal precedent could create ambiguity in case of disputes.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Consult with an attorney specializing in intellectual property to understand the implications of this statement.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "There are no currently effective material determinations...regarding any of the copyrighted materials except for the Franchise Agreement."

    Exit & Transfer Risks

    6 risks identified

    1
    3
    2

    Washington State Franchise Investment Protection Act Superseding Franchise Agreement

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement, particularly regarding termination, renewal, arbitration location, releases of claims, statute of limitations, and other key aspects. This creates uncertainty about the enforceability of certain contract terms.
    • The FDD highlights several areas where Washington law offers franchisees greater protections than the standard franchise agreement, potentially impacting the franchisor's ability to enforce certain provisions.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the Washington FIPA and consult with legal counsel specializing in franchise law in Washington to understand the implications for your specific situation.
    • Compare the franchise agreement with the provisions of the FIPA to identify any discrepancies and assess the potential impact on your business.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to address any concerns arising from the interplay between the franchise agreement and Washington law.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 2: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement...concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal..."
    • Item 3: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be...in the state of Washington..."
    • Item 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17: These items further detail specific areas where Washington law may supersede the franchise agreement.

    Transfer Fee Limitations

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Washington law restricts transfer fees to the franchisor's reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer. This could limit the franchisor's ability to profit from franchise resales and potentially impact the resale value for the franchisee.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request a detailed breakdown of the franchisor's estimated transfer costs to ensure they are reasonable and justifiable.
    • Consult with a franchise attorney to understand the implications of these limitations on transfer fees.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 6: "Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor’s reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer."

    Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law Conflicts

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law may conflict with the franchise agreement regarding termination and change in dealership notices. This creates uncertainty about which law will govern these critical aspects of the franchise relationship.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Consult with legal counsel specializing in Wisconsin franchise law to understand the implications of the Fair Dealership Law and how it interacts with the franchise agreement.
    • Clarify with the franchisor which provisions will govern in case of conflict and document the agreement in writing.

    FDD Citations:

    • Wisconsin Addendum Item 1: "To the extent any of the provisions regarding notice of termination or change in dealership are in conflict with Section 135.04 of the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, the Wisconsin law shall apply."

    ChoiceADVANTAGE Software Terms of Use Modifications

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Choice reserves the right to modify, add, or remove terms and conditions of the choiceADVANTAGE Software Terms of Use without notice. This could lead to unexpected changes in software functionality, fees, or access, potentially disrupting franchise operations.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Regularly review the choiceADVANTAGE Software Terms of Use for any updates or changes.
    • Maintain open communication with Choice regarding any concerns about potential software modifications.

    FDD Citations:

    • Exhibit E: "Choice has the right, at its sole discretion and from time to time, to modify, add or remove any terms or conditions of these Terms of Use without notice or liability to you."

    Software Discontinuation or Restriction

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Choice can change, restrict access to, suspend, or discontinue the choiceADVANTAGE Software without notice. This poses a significant risk to franchisees who rely on the software for their operations, potentially disrupting business and requiring costly transitions to alternative systems.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about Choice's long-term plans for the software and any existing contingency plans for software disruptions.
    • Explore alternative software solutions and maintain awareness of available options in the market.
    • Negotiate for provisions in the franchise agreement addressing software discontinuation or access restrictions, including potential compensation for transition costs.

    FDD Citations:

    • Exhibit E: "Choice may change, restrict access to, suspend, or discontinue the Software...at any time without notice or liability to you or any affiliate of yours."

    Unlawful Buy-Back Provisions Risk (Washington)

    High

    Explanation:

    • In Washington, the franchisor cannot repurchase the franchisee's business without consent during the franchise term unless the franchise is terminated for good cause. While this protects the franchisee, any attempt by the franchisor to include such a provision in the agreement, even if unenforceable, demonstrates a potential disregard for Washington law and raises concerns about their overall approach to franchisee relationships.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Ensure the franchise agreement explicitly excludes any buy-back provisions that violate RCW 19.100.180(2)(j).
    • Consult with a Washington franchise attorney to review the agreement and confirm compliance with state law.
    • Seek clarification from the franchisor regarding their interpretation and application of this law.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8: "Provisions in franchise agreements...that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee’s business for any reason during the term of the franchise agreement without the franchisee’s consent are unlawful pursuant to RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless the franchise is terminated for good cause."

    Operational & Brand Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Dependence on Choice Privileges Loyalty Program

    High

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor's financial statements highlight significant reliance on the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program. A substantial portion of revenue is tied to points redeemed, and a large liability exists related to unredeemed points. Any disruption or negative perception of the program could severely impact the franchisor's financial health and, consequently, franchisee support and system stability.
    • Changes in consumer behavior regarding loyalty programs, competition from other programs, or mismanagement of the program could negatively affect participation and redemption rates, impacting the franchisor's revenue and profitability.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the terms and conditions of the Choice Privileges program and understand its impact on your business operations and revenue projections.
    • Develop local marketing strategies to attract and retain customers independent of the loyalty program, focusing on unique selling propositions of your specific location.
    • Stay informed about changes and updates to the program and actively participate in franchisee advisory councils to voice concerns and contribute to program improvements.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8: "The Company recognized $123.2 million in revenues from loyalty points redeemed...and had a point liability and deferred revenue of $129.6 million and $110.4 million, respectively..."
    • Item 8: "Auditing the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program results is complex due to: (1) the complexity of the models used and the high volume of data...; and (2) the complexity of estimating the future redemption rate."

    Complexity of Loyalty Program Accounting

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The auditor's report highlights the complexity of accounting for the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program, including the use of complex models and significant estimates. This complexity creates a risk of misstatements or errors in the franchisor's financial reporting, which could impact the franchisor's perceived financial health and potentially affect franchisee support and system-wide initiatives.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Consult with a financial advisor experienced in the hospitality industry and loyalty programs to understand the potential implications of the program's accounting complexity.
    • Monitor the franchisor's financial performance closely and inquire about any significant changes or adjustments related to the loyalty program.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8: "Auditing the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program results is complex due to: (1) the complexity of the models used and the high volume of data...; and (2) the complexity of estimating the future redemption rate."
    • Item 8: "Performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of these estimates requires a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, which includes the use of actuarial specialists."

    Brand Reputation Risk

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • While not explicitly stated, the franchisor's financial performance and the success of the loyalty program are intertwined with brand reputation. Any negative publicity or decline in brand perception could impact hotel occupancy rates and franchisee profitability.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Maintain high operational standards and consistently deliver excellent customer service to uphold the brand's reputation.
    • Actively engage in local community initiatives and public relations efforts to build a positive brand image.
    • Monitor online reviews and address customer feedback promptly to mitigate potential reputational damage.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8 (Indirect): The financial statements reflect the overall financial health of the franchisor, which is indirectly tied to brand reputation.

    Performance & ROI Risks

    8 risks identified

    2
    4
    2

    Reliance on Choice Privileges Program

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • A significant portion of revenue is derived from the Choice Privileges program (Table 1a shows Choice Privileges Contribution averaging 80.8%). Over-reliance on this program creates vulnerability to changes in program terms, competition from other loyalty programs, and shifts in customer preference.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Develop strategies to attract non-Choice Privileges customers through targeted marketing and promotions.
    • Explore partnerships with other loyalty programs or develop a proprietary loyalty program to diversify customer base.
    • Continuously monitor the performance of the Choice Privileges program and adapt strategies accordingly.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19, Table 1a: "Choice Privileges Contribution" data.
    • Item 19: Definition of "Choice Privileges Contribution."

    Variability in Hotel Performance

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 19 reveals a wide range in key performance indicators (Occupancy Rate, ADR, RevPAR) across the Performance Sample, indicating significant variability in hotel profitability. The "low" and "high" values demonstrate the potential for underperformance.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct thorough due diligence on the specific market and location to assess its potential.
    • Develop a robust business plan with realistic projections based on local market conditions.
    • Seek expert advice on revenue management and pricing strategies to optimize performance.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19, Tables 1a, 1b, 1c: "Low" and "High" values for Occupancy Rate, ADR, and RevPAR.
    • Item 19: "Some franchised COUNTRY hotels have earned the results indicated above. Your individual results may differ."

    Dependence on Franchisor's Systems

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD highlights the importance of the franchisor's CRS (Central Reservation System) and other marketing channels for revenue generation. This dependence creates a risk if these systems experience technical issues, underperform, or if the franchisor's marketing strategies are ineffective.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Develop a strong local marketing plan to supplement the franchisor's efforts.
    • Explore alternative booking channels and marketing opportunities.
    • Maintain open communication with the franchisor regarding system performance and marketing strategies.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19: Definition of "Total Choice Enterprise Contribution."

    Franchisee Turnover

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 1, shows a net decrease in franchised outlets over the past three years. While the numbers are relatively small, this trend could indicate underlying challenges within the franchise system and warrant further investigation.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the reasons for franchise terminations and transfers.
    • Speak with existing and former franchisees to understand their experiences and challenges.
    • Assess the franchisor's support system and resources for franchisees.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 1: "Systemwide Outlet Summary."

    No Financial Performance Representations Other Than Item 19

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The FDD explicitly states that no financial performance representations are made other than the information provided in Item 19. This limits the prospective franchisee's ability to assess potential profitability under different scenarios or market conditions.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct independent market research and financial analysis.
    • Consult with experienced hospitality industry professionals.
    • Develop conservative financial projections based on available data and industry benchmarks.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19: "Other than the preceding financial performance representation, we do not make any financial performance representations."

    Data Reliance on Franchisee-Provided Information

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD mentions that the performance data is based on information provided by individual franchise owners. This raises concerns about the accuracy and consistency of the data, as there is potential for inconsistencies in reporting practices among franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request and review the written substantiation of the financial information.
    • Compare the provided data with industry benchmarks and other available data sources.
    • Consult with an accountant or financial advisor to assess the reliability of the financial information.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19: "The data presented in the above tables are based on information that individual franchise owners provided to us."

    Impact of Renovations on Performance

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The FDD provides separate performance data for Generation 4 hotels (renovated) and Generation 1-3 hotels. While Generation 4 hotels generally show slightly better performance, the FDD doesn't detail the costs associated with these renovations, making it difficult to assess the true ROI of such upgrades.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Obtain detailed cost estimates for renovations and factor them into financial projections.
    • Carefully evaluate the potential return on investment for renovations before committing to them.
    • Consider alternative strategies for improving hotel performance without major renovations.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19, Tables 1b and 1c: Performance data for Generation 4 and Generation 1-3 hotels.

    No Assurance of Specific Earnings

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD explicitly states "There is no assurance that you will earn as much" as the presented average figures. This underscores the inherent risk in franchising and the possibility of financial underperformance.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Develop a realistic business plan with conservative financial projections.
    • Manage expenses carefully and monitor performance closely.
    • Seek expert advice on revenue management and cost control strategies.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19: "Some franchised COUNTRY hotels have earned the results indicated above. Your individual results may differ. There is no assurance that you will earn as much."
    FDD Documents by Year

    Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents

    FDD Year: 2025

    Uploaded: 8/9/2025

    FDD Documents

    Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year

    Complete Franchise Analysis for Country Inn & Suites by Radisson

    Due Diligence Analysis

    Comprehensive due diligence analysis and risk assessment for Country Inn & Suites by Radisson franchise opportunities.

    Professional due diligence assessment covering 10 critical evaluation categories including financial performance analysis, market risk assessment, operational due diligence, legal compliance review, and franchise system evaluation.

    Investment Requirements and Financial Analysis

    Franchise Fee: $50,000

    Total Investment Range: $808,000 to $3,380,000

    Liquid Capital Required: $292,500

    Ongoing Royalty Fee: 6% of gross sales revenue

    Marketing Fund Contribution: 4% of gross sales

    Market Trends and Search Volume Analysis

    Comprehensive market analysis and search trend data for Country Inn & Suites by Radisson franchise opportunities. This includes Google search volume trends, market interest indicators, seasonal patterns, and year-over-year growth analysis powered by authentic DataForSEO market research data.

    Franchise System Overview

    Total US Locations: 419 franchise and company-owned units

    Company Founded: 1986 - Established franchise system with proven business model

    Industry Sector: Hospitality franchise opportunities