C
Cleanest Restaurant Group
Home Services
Founded 201711 locationsCompany Profile
Year Founded:2017
Cleanest Restaurant Group Franchise Cost
| Franchise Fee: | $60,000Key Metric |
| Total Investment: | $103,000 - $144,000Key Metric |
| Liquid Capital: | $25,000 |
| Royalty Fee: | 8% of gross sales |
| Marketing Fee: | 1% of gross sales |
Quick ROI Calculator
Based on Cleanest Restaurant Group's actual financial data
Outlet Counts by Year
Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
Total US Locations:11
Scale relative to 1,000 locations
Franchised Units:10
Corporate Units:1
Additional Information
Processing Franchise Details
Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.
Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.
Search Interests & Trends
Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis
Search Interest & Trends
No Trends Data Available
Trend analysis data for Cleanest Restaurant Group is being collected. Check back soon for insights.
AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis
Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.
15
High Risk
Critical items
34% of total
23
Medium Risk
Monitor closely
52% of total
6
Low Risk
Manageable items
14% of total
44
Total Items
Factors analyzed
10 categories
6.02
Overall Score
Low RiskHigh Risk
010
Franchisor Stability Risks
6 risks identified
2
3
1
Limited Operating History of Franchisor
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor, Cleanest Restaurant Group Franchise Inc., was established very recently in 2022 and only began offering franchises in March 2022. This limited operating history increases the risk of unforeseen challenges and potential instability as the franchisor navigates the complexities of franchising.
- Their inexperience in managing a franchise system could lead to inadequate support for franchisees, inconsistent application of policies, and difficulties in adapting to market changes.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the management team's background and experience, even outside of franchising, to assess their capabilities.
- Speak with existing franchisees to gauge their satisfaction with the level of support and training provided.
- Carefully review the FDD, particularly Items 2 and 19, for any disclosures regarding litigation, bankruptcy, or other financial difficulties that could indicate instability.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "We are a New York corporation established on January 26, 2022. We began offering franchises as of March 25, 2022."
Dependence on Affiliated Supplier
Medium
Explanation:
- The requirement to purchase System Supplies exclusively from the franchisor, its affiliates, or designated suppliers creates dependence and limits franchisees' flexibility in sourcing potentially more cost-effective alternatives.
- This dependence could expose franchisees to price increases or supply chain disruptions controlled by the franchisor or its affiliates.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the Franchise Agreement and related documents for details on pricing and supply agreements for System Supplies.
- Inquire about the franchisor's supply chain management practices and contingency plans for potential disruptions.
- Negotiate for greater flexibility in sourcing supplies, if possible.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "You may only offer and sell the Approved Services and Products using System Supplies purchased through us, our affiliates or our designated approved suppliers."
Competition in a Fragmented Market
Medium
Explanation:
- The restaurant cleaning services market is highly competitive and fragmented, with numerous local and independent providers. This intense competition can make it challenging to establish market share and maintain profitability.
- The FDD acknowledges competition from "many local and independently owned service providers including businesses offering janitorial services and cleaning services."
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully evaluate the competitive landscape in your target market and develop a strong marketing and differentiation strategy.
- Understand the franchisor's brand recognition and marketing support programs.
- Assess the demand for restaurant cleaning services in your area and the potential for growth.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "The market for restaurant cleaning services is highly competitive and is not seasonal in nature."
Limited Franchisee Network and Performance Data
Medium
Explanation:
- The small number of franchisees (4 as of the end of 2024) and the absence of detailed financial performance representations in the provided excerpt limit the ability to assess the potential success of the franchise.
- This lack of data makes it difficult to benchmark performance and evaluate the franchisor's claims about the business model.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request additional information from the franchisor regarding franchisee performance, including average revenues and expenses.
- Speak with as many existing franchisees as possible to gain insights into their experiences and financial results.
- Consult with a franchise consultant or attorney to analyze the available information and assess the risks.
FDD Citations:
- Item 20, Table 1: Shows limited number of franchise units.
Reliance on Young Affiliate for Brand Ownership
High
Explanation:
- The Licensed Marks are owned by a separate affiliate, Cleanest Restaurant Group IP, Inc., also established in 2022. This reliance on a young affiliate for a crucial asset like trademarks introduces potential risks related to the affiliate's financial stability and ability to protect the brand.
- Any financial or legal issues affecting the IP holding company could jeopardize the franchisees' right to use the Licensed Marks.
Potential Mitigations:
- Investigate the financial stability and legal standing of Cleanest Restaurant Group IP, Inc.
- Review the licensing agreement between the franchisor and the IP holding company to understand the terms and conditions of trademark usage.
- Consult with an attorney specializing in intellectual property law to assess the risks associated with this arrangement.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "Our affiliate Cleanest Restaurant Group IP, Inc. [...] is the owner of the Licensed Marks."
Potential Conflicts of Interest with Affiliate Operating Similar Business
Low
Explanation:
- The existence of an affiliate, Cleanest Restaurant Group, Inc., operating a similar business using the Licensed Marks raises potential conflicts of interest. While the FDD states franchisees will not directly conduct business with this affiliate, there's a possibility of competition or preferential treatment for the affiliate.
Potential Mitigations:
- Seek clarification from the franchisor regarding the relationship between the franchise system and the affiliate operating a similar business.
- Review the Franchise Agreement for any clauses addressing potential conflicts of interest or territorial restrictions related to the affiliate's operations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "Our affiliate Cleanest Restaurant Group, Inc. [...] operates a business that is similar to the Franchised Business and uses the Licensed Marks."
Disclosure & Representation Risks
6 risks identified
2
3
1
Limited Operating History
High
Explanation:
- Cleanest Restaurant Group was founded in 2017, representing a relatively short operating history in the franchising world. This limited track record can make it difficult to fully assess the long-term viability and profitability of the franchise model, especially during economic downturns or changing market conditions.
- There's less historical data available to analyze trends, predict future performance, and evaluate the franchisor's ability to adapt to evolving industry landscapes.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the franchisor's background, management team experience, and reasons for the relatively recent founding. Look for evidence of rapid growth, positive customer reviews, and strong franchisee satisfaction despite the shorter history.
- Speak with existing franchisees about their experiences, challenges, and successes with the franchise. Inquire about the support received from the franchisor and their overall satisfaction with the business model.
- Consult with a financial advisor and franchise attorney to assess the financial projections and legal agreements, ensuring they are realistic and protect your interests.
FDD Citations:
- General FDD Information: Franchisor founded in 2017
Unproven Business Model in Home Services for Restaurants
High
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions "Cleanest Restaurant Group" and "Home Services" which creates confusion. It's unclear if the franchise focuses on cleaning restaurants (a commercial service) or providing home services. This ambiguity raises concerns about the target market and the franchisor's expertise in the intended industry.
- If the focus is on cleaning restaurants, it's a niche market and may have limited growth potential compared to broader home services. If it's general home services, the brand name is misleading and may not attract the right customers.
Potential Mitigations:
- Seek clarification from the franchisor regarding the specific services offered and the target market. Confirm their expertise and experience in the chosen industry.
- Analyze the market demand for the services offered, considering the competition and potential customer base. Conduct independent market research to validate the franchisor's claims.
- Evaluate the marketing materials and brand messaging to ensure they align with the target market and clearly communicate the services offered.
FDD Citations:
- General FDD Information: Company name and industry description
Marketing and Advertising Requirements and Restrictions
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions "Guidelines for Using Logos and Marks," "Marketing Standards," and "Obtaining Marketing Approval." These indicate potential restrictions on franchisees' marketing efforts, which could limit their flexibility and creativity in reaching local customers.
- Required marketing expenditures, including system marketing and local marketing requirements, could represent a significant financial burden, especially for new franchisees. The effectiveness of these mandated marketing programs may not be guaranteed.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the marketing requirements and restrictions outlined in the FDD. Understand the specific guidelines, approval processes, and associated costs.
- Discuss the marketing program with existing franchisees to assess its effectiveness and identify any challenges or limitations.
- Develop a detailed local marketing plan that aligns with the franchisor's requirements while maximizing your reach within the target market.
FDD Citations:
- Item 4: Marketing the Business - Sections 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.3, 4.4
Dependence on Franchisor's Operations Manual and Software
Medium
Explanation:
- The detailed Operations Manual Table of Contents suggests a high degree of reliance on the franchisor's prescribed operating procedures, potentially limiting franchisees' autonomy and flexibility in managing their businesses.
- The mention of "Operations Software" indicates potential dependence on the franchisor's proprietary technology, which could create challenges if the software is inadequate, expensive, or lacks proper support.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review the Operations Manual and any software agreements to understand the specific requirements and limitations. Assess the practicality and cost-effectiveness of the prescribed procedures and technology.
- Speak with existing franchisees about their experiences with the Operations Manual and software. Inquire about any issues, limitations, or hidden costs associated with these tools.
- Evaluate alternative software solutions and operating procedures to determine if more efficient or cost-effective options are available within the franchise framework.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit C: Operations Manual Table of Contents
- Item 5: Operating Procedures - Section 5.7
Potential for Misleading or Incomplete Information
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 23 emphasizes the importance of signing and returning the receipt, but doesn't explicitly mention the implications of not doing so. This could potentially lead to misunderstandings or disputes regarding the receipt of the FDD.
- While the FDD provides contact information for state administrators and agents for service of process, it doesn't explicitly state the franchisee's responsibilities for compliance with state-specific regulations. This could create compliance risks if franchisees are unaware of their obligations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Confirm with the franchisor the purpose of the receipt and the consequences of not returning it. Document all communication regarding the receipt.
- Independently research and verify the franchise registration and compliance requirements in your specific state. Consult with a franchise attorney to ensure full compliance.
- Request clarification from the franchisor regarding any ambiguities or unclear statements in the FDD. Document all communication and seek professional legal advice if necessary.
FDD Citations:
- Item 23: Receipts
- Exhibit A: State Administrators
- Exhibit B: Agents for Service of Process
Personnel and Employment Law Compliance Risks
Low
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions "Employment Law Basics," "Federal Regulations on Employment Relationships," and "State Employment Laws." This highlights the complex legal landscape surrounding employment practices, which could pose compliance risks for franchisees, especially those without prior experience managing employees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the employment law guidelines provided in the FDD and consult with an employment attorney to ensure full compliance with federal and state regulations.
- Implement robust HR policies and procedures, including employee handbooks, training programs, and performance evaluation systems, to minimize legal risks and promote fair employment practices.
- Stay updated on changes in employment laws and regulations and seek professional advice when necessary to adapt your practices accordingly.
FDD Citations:
- Item 3: Personnel - Sections 3.2, 3.2.2, 3.2.3
Financial & Fee Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Limited Operating History and Financial Performance Data
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor has a very limited operating history, founded in 2017 and with only one fully operational franchise outlet for the full 2023 calendar year.
- The provided financial performance data is based on a small sample size and may not be representative of future performance.
- The significant growth in the number of outlets from 4 in 2023 to 10 in 2024, while positive, also introduces uncertainty and potential challenges in maintaining consistent support and quality control across a rapidly expanding network.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the franchisor's business model, management team, and market position.
- Consult with existing franchisees to understand their experiences and assess the franchisor's support and training programs.
- Develop a realistic business plan with conservative financial projections, considering the limited historical data available.
- Seek professional advice from a financial advisor and legal counsel experienced in franchising to evaluate the investment opportunity.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "During the 2023 Calendar Year we had a total of four Franchise Outlets. Of the four Franchise Outlets, one Outlet was an Operational Franchise Outlet and three Outlets were New Franchise Outlets."
- Item 19: Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 provide limited financial performance data for a small number of outlets.
Variability in Franchise Outlet Performance
High
Explanation:
- Significant variations in gross sales and other performance metrics exist among the few operational franchise outlets.
- This variability raises concerns about the consistency and predictability of revenue generation across different locations.
- Factors contributing to this variability are not explicitly explained in the FDD, making it difficult to assess the potential risks and opportunities for a new franchisee.
Potential Mitigations:
- Analyze the provided data carefully to understand the reasons behind the performance differences among outlets.
- Inquire with the franchisor about the factors influencing outlet performance and their strategies for supporting franchisees in achieving consistent results.
- Conduct thorough market research for the specific territory being considered to assess its potential for generating revenue.
- Develop a detailed business plan that accounts for potential variations in performance and includes contingency plans for managing financial challenges.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 show significant variations in gross sales, number of recurrent service restaurants, and average weekly gross sales among the operational outlets.
Dependence on Recurrent Service Restaurant Sales
Medium
Explanation:
- A significant portion of the reported gross sales comes from recurrent service restaurant contracts.
- Over-reliance on this revenue stream can create vulnerability to customer churn and competitive pressures.
- Loss of key recurrent service contracts could significantly impact a franchisee's financial stability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop a diversified customer base and explore opportunities for generating revenue from non-recurrent services.
- Implement effective customer retention strategies to maintain long-term relationships with recurrent service restaurants.
- Continuously monitor the competitive landscape and adapt service offerings to meet evolving market demands.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: Table 7 highlights the proportion of gross sales derived from recurrent and non-recurrent service restaurant sales.
Legal & Contract Risks
7 risks identified
2
3
2
Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law Impact
Medium
Explanation:
- The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law (WFDL) can significantly impact termination rights and may offer more protection to franchisees than the standard franchise agreement.
- The WFDL requires "good cause" for termination, which is a higher standard than typically found in franchise agreements and can make it more difficult for the franchisor to terminate the agreement.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the WFDL and understand its implications for termination.
- Consult with an attorney specializing in franchise law, particularly in Wisconsin, to assess the potential impact of the WFDL on the franchise agreement.
- Ensure operations comply with the WFDL to minimize the risk of termination disputes.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17: "The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law Title XIV-A Ch. 135, Section 135.01-135.07 may affect the termination provision of the Franchise Agreement."
Waiver of Claims Restrictions (CA, HI, IL)
Low
Explanation:
- The franchise agreements for California, Hawaii, and Illinois explicitly prohibit waivers of claims under state franchise laws. This protects franchisees from unknowingly signing away their rights.
Potential Mitigations:
- Review the specific state franchise laws in CA, HI, and IL to understand the protected rights.
- Ensure all communications and agreements comply with these non-waiver provisions.
FDD Citations:
- CA Amendment: "No statement...shall have the effect of: (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law..."
- HI Amendment, Section 3: Similar language as CA.
- IL Amendment: Similar language as CA.
Hawaii Franchise Investment Law Inconsistencies
Medium
Explanation:
- The Hawaii amendment states that the Hawaii Franchise Investment Law (HFIL) will prevail if any inconsistencies exist between the Franchise Agreement and the HFIL. This creates uncertainty about which provisions will ultimately govern the relationship.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the HFIL and compare it to the Franchise Agreement to identify any potential conflicts.
- Consult with a franchise attorney specializing in Hawaii law to clarify any ambiguities and ensure compliance with the HFIL.
FDD Citations:
- HI Amendment, Sections 1 & 2: "...the Hawaii Franchise Investment Law will control."
Illinois Jurisdiction and Venue Requirements
Low
Explanation:
- The Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act voids any provision designating jurisdiction or venue outside of Illinois, except for arbitration. This could limit the franchisor's options in legal disputes.
Potential Mitigations:
- Understand the implications of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act regarding jurisdiction and venue.
- Consult with legal counsel regarding the enforceability of arbitration agreements under Illinois law.
FDD Citations:
- IL Amendment: "In conformance with Section 4 of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act, any provision in a Franchise Agreement that designates jurisdiction and venue in a forum outside of the State of Illinois is void."
Maryland Dispute Resolution Conflict
High
Explanation:
- The Maryland amendment highlights a conflict between the Franchise Agreement's arbitration clause and Maryland regulations that prohibit waiving the right to sue in Maryland for violations of the Maryland Franchise Law. This creates uncertainty about the enforceability of the arbitration clause.
- This conflict could lead to costly and time-consuming litigation to determine the appropriate forum for resolving disputes.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with an attorney specializing in Maryland franchise law to assess the enforceability of the arbitration clause in light of Maryland regulations.
- Consider revising the arbitration clause to explicitly acknowledge the franchisee's right to sue in Maryland for violations of the Maryland Franchise Law.
FDD Citations:
- MD Amendment, Section 1: "A Maryland franchise regulation states that it is an unfair or deceptive practice to require a franchisee to waive its right to file a lawsuit in Maryland claiming a violation of the Maryland Franchise Law."
Maryland General Release Limitation
Medium
Explanation:
- The Maryland amendment specifies that the general release upon renewal, sale, or transfer does not apply to liabilities under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law. This could expose the franchisor to ongoing liability even after the franchise relationship ends.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law to understand the potential liabilities that are not covered by the general release.
- Consult with legal counsel to assess the potential risks and develop strategies to mitigate ongoing liability.
FDD Citations:
- MD Amendment, Section 2: "The general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, and/or assignment/transfer shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law."
Variations in State Franchise Laws
High
Explanation:
- The FDD includes specific amendments for various states (CA, HI, IL, MD), indicating significant variations in state franchise laws. These variations create complexity in managing the franchise system and increase the risk of non-compliance.
- Failing to comply with specific state franchise laws can lead to legal challenges, penalties, and damage to the brand's reputation.
Potential Mitigations:
- Engage experienced franchise counsel in each state of operation to ensure full compliance with all applicable state franchise laws and regulations.
- Develop robust training programs for staff to ensure they understand and adhere to the specific requirements of each state's franchise laws.
- Implement a system for tracking and managing compliance requirements across different states.
FDD Citations:
- Various State Amendments: The presence of state-specific amendments highlights the variations in state franchise laws.
Territory & Competition Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Intense Competition in Restaurant Cleaning Market
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states the market for restaurant cleaning services is "highly competitive." This poses a significant threat to franchisees, especially new entrants, as they must contend with established players for market share.
- Competition can lead to price wars, reduced profit margins, and difficulty attracting and retaining customers.
- The presence of numerous local and independent service providers, along with larger janitorial and facility maintenance companies, creates a challenging competitive landscape.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop a strong, differentiated brand identity and marketing strategy to stand out from competitors. Focus on unique selling propositions, such as specialized cleaning techniques, eco-friendly practices, or superior customer service.
- Build strong relationships with local restaurant owners and managers through networking and targeted outreach. Offer competitive pricing and value-added services to attract and retain clients.
- Continuously monitor the competitive landscape and adapt your business strategy as needed. Stay informed about industry trends and competitor activities to maintain a competitive edge.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "The market for restaurant cleaning services is highly competitive and is not seasonal in nature."
- Item 1: "You will be competing with businesses that provide restaurant cleaning services, janitorial services, facility maintenance, and similar services."
- Item 1: "You will be competing with many local and independently owned service providers including businesses offering janitorial services and cleaning services."
Dependence on Franchisor's Approved Suppliers
Medium
Explanation:
- The requirement to purchase System Supplies exclusively from the franchisor, its affiliates, or designated suppliers limits flexibility and potentially increases costs.
- Franchisees are unable to leverage potentially more cost-effective alternatives from other suppliers, impacting profitability.
- Dependence on the franchisor's supply chain creates vulnerability to supply disruptions, price increases, and quality control issues.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the Franchise Agreement and related supplier agreements to understand the terms and conditions, including pricing structures, product quality guarantees, and dispute resolution mechanisms.
- Negotiate favorable terms with the franchisor regarding supply costs and flexibility, if possible.
- Develop contingency plans for potential supply chain disruptions, such as identifying alternative suppliers or building up inventory of essential supplies.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "You may only offer and sell the Approved Services and Products using System Supplies purchased through us, our affiliates or our designated approved suppliers."
Limited Territory Grant with Potential for Encroachment
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions a designated operating territory but provides no details about its size or exclusivity. This ambiguity raises concerns about potential encroachment from other franchisees or the franchisor's own operations.
- Competition within the designated territory could limit growth potential and profitability.
- Lack of clarity regarding territory protection mechanisms leaves franchisees vulnerable to market saturation.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request detailed information about the proposed territory, including its boundaries, demographics, and competitive landscape. Negotiate for a clearly defined and protected territory with explicit exclusivity provisions in the Franchise Agreement.
- Inquire about the franchisor's plans for future franchise development in the surrounding area to assess the risk of encroachment.
- Consult with a legal professional to review the Franchise Agreement and ensure adequate protection of territorial rights.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "Under the Franchise Agreement, we will grant to you the right to develop and operate one Cleanest Restaurant Group Business within a designated operating territory (your “Operating Territory”)."
- Item 1: "At the time of signing the Franchise Agreement we will designate a geographic area comprising your operating territory."
Regulatory & Compliance Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Compliance with Industry-Specific Laws and Regulations
High
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions various laws and regulations at different levels (federal, state, and local) that apply to the franchised business, including health and safety regulations, contractor/home improvement licensing, employment practices, wage and hour laws, and immigration laws. Navigating these complex and potentially varying requirements can be challenging and costly for franchisees.
- Failure to comply with these regulations can lead to penalties, legal action, business interruption, and reputational damage, significantly impacting franchise success.
Potential Mitigations:
- Engage legal counsel specializing in franchise law and the specific industry to ensure thorough understanding and compliance with all applicable regulations in the target operating territory.
- Develop a comprehensive compliance checklist and schedule regular reviews to ensure ongoing adherence to evolving regulations.
- Implement robust training programs for employees on relevant regulations, particularly those related to health and safety and employment practices.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "Many states and local jurisdictions have laws, rules, and regulations that may apply to the Franchised Business...You must evaluate and obtain the necessary licenses, certification, permits and approval..."
- Item 1: "You will also be subject to federal and state laws and regulations that apply to businesses generally, including rules and regulations involving employment practices, wage and hour laws, immigration and employment laws."
Dependence on Franchisor's Designated Suppliers
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD states that franchisees must purchase System Supplies exclusively through the franchisor, its affiliates, or designated suppliers. This restricts franchisees' ability to negotiate better pricing or explore alternative suppliers, potentially impacting profitability.
- Dependence on designated suppliers creates vulnerability to supply chain disruptions, price increases, and potential quality issues, which could negatively affect the franchisee's operations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchisor's supply agreements and pricing structures to understand potential costs and limitations.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for greater flexibility in sourcing supplies, if possible.
- Develop contingency plans for potential supply chain disruptions, such as identifying alternative suppliers or building up inventory.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "You may only offer and sell the Approved Services and Products using System Supplies purchased through us, our affiliates or our designated approved suppliers."
Intense Competition in the Restaurant Cleaning Market
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD acknowledges a highly competitive market for restaurant cleaning services, with numerous local and independent service providers. This competition can make it difficult to acquire and retain customers, impacting revenue generation.
- Competition can also drive down prices, squeezing profit margins for franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the local market to understand the competitive landscape and identify potential niches or differentiators.
- Develop a strong marketing and sales strategy to effectively target potential customers and highlight the unique value proposition of the franchise.
- Focus on building strong customer relationships and providing exceptional service to foster loyalty and generate positive word-of-mouth referrals.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "The market for restaurant cleaning services is highly competitive...You will be competing with many local and independently owned service providers..."
Franchisor Support Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Limited Initial Training Duration
Medium
Explanation:
- One week of initial training may be insufficient to prepare franchisees, especially those new to the restaurant cleaning industry, for the complexities of operating a Cleanest Restaurant Group business. This includes managing staff, marketing, sales, customer service, and technical aspects of the cleaning services.
- The FDD mentions 30 days prior to opening for training, but only describes a one-week program. This discrepancy raises concerns about the adequacy of preparation time.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request a detailed training schedule and curriculum to assess the comprehensiveness of the program.
- Inquire about opportunities for additional training or support beyond the initial week, such as ongoing webinars, online resources, or mentorship programs.
- Seek out and network with existing franchisees to gain insights into their training experiences and the practical skills required for success.
FDD Citations:
- Item 7: "Our current training program is to be attended by you... at our training facility... over an approximate one week period."
- Item 7: "Not less than 30 days prior to the opening... you must attend and complete our initial training program."
Restrictive Site Selection Process
Medium
Explanation:
- Franchisor approval is required for the administrative office location, and disagreement can lead to termination and forfeiture of the initial fee. This creates a significant power imbalance and potential for disputes.
- The FDD provides limited details on site selection criteria, creating uncertainty and potential for subjective application of standards.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review the franchisor's site selection guidelines and criteria before signing the agreement.
- Clarify the approval process, including timelines, appeal mechanisms, and specific reasons for potential rejection.
- Consult with a real estate professional experienced in franchise site selection to identify suitable locations that align with the franchisor's requirements.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: "You are responsible for selecting a site... and must obtain our approval... If we cannot agree on a site, your Franchise Agreement may be terminated and your initial fee will be forfeited."
Short Timeframe to Open
High
Explanation:
- The 60-day timeframe to open after signing the franchise agreement is very aggressive and may not be realistic, especially considering the time required for training, licensing, site selection, and other preparations.
- Failure to meet this deadline could jeopardize the franchise agreement.
Potential Mitigations:
- Negotiate a more reasonable timeframe for opening, considering the specific circumstances and local regulations.
- Develop a detailed project plan with clear milestones and timelines for all pre-opening activities.
- Secure all necessary licenses and permits as early as possible to avoid delays.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: "Within 60 days from the signing of your Franchise Agreement you must open and offer services and products."
Exit & Transfer Risks
7 risks identified
2
3
2
Conflict with State Franchise Laws
High
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions several state-specific amendments to address conflicts between the Franchise Agreement and state franchise laws (California, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland). This highlights a potential risk that the standard Franchise Agreement may not fully comply with various state regulations, leading to legal challenges and disputes.
- Inconsistencies between the Franchise Agreement and state laws can create uncertainty and potential liabilities for franchisees, particularly regarding termination, renewal, and transfer rights.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the state-specific amendments relevant to your location to ensure you understand your rights and obligations under both the Franchise Agreement and applicable state law.
- Consult with a franchise attorney specializing in your state's laws to assess potential risks and ensure the Franchise Agreement and amendments adequately protect your interests.
- Compare the protections offered by the Franchise Agreement and state law, and prioritize the more favorable terms.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, State Specific Amendments: California, Hawaii, Illinois, and Maryland amendments all address specific modifications to comply with respective state franchise laws.
Waiver of Rights Limitations
Medium
Explanation:
- Several state amendments explicitly prohibit waivers of claims under state franchise laws. This suggests the standard Franchise Agreement might contain provisions that could be interpreted as requiring such waivers, posing a risk to franchisees.
- Franchisees could unknowingly waive important legal rights if they are not aware of these limitations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the Franchise Agreement and all related documents for any clauses that could be construed as a waiver of rights under state law.
- Seek legal counsel to ensure you understand the implications of any such clauses and negotiate their removal or modification if necessary.
- Pay close attention to the non-waiver provisions in the state-specific amendments.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, State Specific Amendments: California, Hawaii, and Illinois amendments specifically address non-waiver provisions.
Restrictive Dispute Resolution (Arbitration)
Medium
Explanation:
- The Maryland amendment highlights a potential conflict between the Franchise Agreement's arbitration clause and the state's franchise law, which protects a franchisee's right to sue in Maryland courts.
- Mandatory arbitration can limit a franchisee's legal recourse and potentially increase the cost and complexity of resolving disputes.
Potential Mitigations:
- Understand the implications of the arbitration clause and its potential impact on your ability to pursue legal action in your state.
- Consult with an attorney to assess the enforceability of the arbitration clause in your jurisdiction and explore options for negotiation.
- Consider the potential costs and benefits of arbitration compared to litigation.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, Maryland Amendment: Specifically discusses the potential conflict between the arbitration clause and Maryland Franchise Law.
Impact of Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions that the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law may affect the termination provisions of the Franchise Agreement. This introduces uncertainty regarding the specific impact of this law and how it might differ from the standard termination provisions.
- Franchisees in Wisconsin face potential complexities in understanding their termination rights and obligations.
Potential Mitigations:
- If operating in Wisconsin, carefully review the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law and consult with an attorney specializing in this area to understand its implications on the Franchise Agreement.
- Compare the termination provisions in the Franchise Agreement with the protections offered by the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law.
- Seek clarification from the franchisor regarding the interplay between the Franchise Agreement and the Wisconsin law.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17: "The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law Title XIV-A Ch. 135, Section 135.01-135.07 may affect the termination provision of the Franchise Agreement."
Limited Transfer Rights
Low
Explanation:
- While not explicitly stated, the focus on state laws regarding transfer suggests the Franchise Agreement may contain restrictions on transferring the franchise. This can limit a franchisee's ability to sell their business or exit the franchise system.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the transfer provisions in the Franchise Agreement and understand the conditions and requirements for transferring the franchise.
- Consult with a franchise attorney to assess the reasonableness of the transfer restrictions and negotiate more favorable terms if necessary.
- Consider the potential impact of these restrictions on your long-term exit strategy.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, Hawaii Amendment: References "Conditions for Approval of Transfer" suggesting potential restrictions.
Renewal Challenges
Low
Explanation:
- Similar to transfer restrictions, the FDD's emphasis on state laws regarding renewal suggests the Franchise Agreement may contain conditions that could make renewal difficult or uncertain. This can impact the long-term viability of the franchise business.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review the renewal provisions in the Franchise Agreement and understand the criteria for renewal.
- Consult with a franchise attorney to assess the fairness of the renewal terms and negotiate more favorable conditions if needed.
- Develop a strong understanding of the franchisor's renewal practices and track your performance against the renewal criteria.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, Hawaii Amendment: References "Conditions for Renewal" indicating potential challenges.
General Release Requirements
High
Explanation:
- The Maryland amendment mentions a general release requirement for renewal, sale, and/or transfer. This raises concerns about the scope of the release and the potential for franchisees to waive valid claims against the franchisor.
- A broad general release could prevent franchisees from seeking redress for past grievances or breaches of contract.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the language of the general release and seek legal counsel to understand its implications.
- Negotiate to limit the scope of the release to specific claims or exclude claims related to state franchise law violations.
- Document any outstanding issues or disputes with the franchisor before signing the general release.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, Maryland Amendment: "The general release required as a condition of renewal, sale, and/or assignment/transfer shall not apply to any liability under the Maryland Franchise Registration and Disclosure Law."
Operational & Brand Risks
3 risks identified
3
Restrictive Vendor Requirements
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 8 restricts sources for products and services, potentially limiting franchisee flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
- Franchisees may be forced to use more expensive approved vendors, impacting profitability.
- Limited vendor options can lead to supply chain disruptions if approved vendors experience issues.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review Item 8 and the full list of approved vendors to assess pricing and reliability.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for flexibility in sourcing, especially if competitive alternatives exist.
- Develop contingency plans for potential supply chain disruptions.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "the franchisor will not obtain money, goods, services...from any other person with whom the franchisee does business...unless the benefit is promptly accounted for and transmitted by the franchisee."
Mandatory Marketing Expenditures
Medium
Explanation:
- Franchisees are required to spend a minimum amount on local marketing ($500/month + $300/month per additional territory), regardless of market conditions or effectiveness.
- This fixed cost can strain profitability, especially during slow periods or in saturated markets.
- The franchisor's control over marketing may not be aligned with local market needs.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop a detailed marketing plan to ensure efficient use of the mandatory spend.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for flexibility in marketing strategies and budget allocation.
- Track marketing ROI closely to optimize campaigns and demonstrate effectiveness.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11, Advertising: "On an on-going monthly basis, you must spend not less than $500 per month plus $300 per month for each Additional Territory..."
Limited Control Over Pricing
Medium
Explanation:
- While franchisees set prices, the franchisor can suggest pricing levels, potentially limiting flexibility to respond to local competition or market conditions.
- Franchisor-suggested pricing may not be optimal for maximizing profitability in specific territories.
Potential Mitigations:
- Analyze local market pricing and competitor strategies to understand optimal price points.
- Present data-driven arguments to the franchisor to justify deviations from suggested pricing.
- Focus on value-added services or differentiation to justify premium pricing if necessary.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11, Pricing: "...you will exclusively determine the prices...However, we may suggest pricing levels..."
Performance & ROI Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Limited Operating History
High
Explanation:
- Cleanest Restaurant Group is a relatively young franchisor, founded in 2017.
- The limited operating history (especially franchise history) makes it difficult to project future performance and assess the long-term viability of the franchise model.
- The FDD only provides data for a small number of franchise outlets over a short period, making trend analysis and performance prediction challenging.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the franchisor's background, management team, and business plan.
- Speak with existing franchisees to understand their experiences and challenges.
- Consult with a financial advisor to assess the financial risks and potential returns.
- Consider the franchisor's support and training programs to ensure adequate guidance during the initial stages of operation.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "During the 2023 Calendar Year we had a total of four Franchise Outlets..."
- Item 19: "During the 2024 Calendar Year we had a total of 10 Franchise Outlets..."
Small Sample Size
High
Explanation:
- The Item 19 data is based on a very small number of operational franchise outlets (one in 2023 and four in 2024).
- This small sample size makes the data less reliable and potentially misleading. The performance of a few outlets may not be representative of the potential performance of all franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Acknowledge that the provided data may not be fully representative of future performance.
- Seek additional information from the franchisor about the performance of other outlets, even those not included in Item 19.
- Conduct independent market research to assess the demand for the services in your target area.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "In this Item 19 we exclude data for our New Franchise Outlets that were not operational for the full reported Calendar Year."
- Item 19: Tables 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Variability in Franchisee Performance
Medium
Explanation:
- Significant variation in gross sales exists among the few reported operational franchise outlets.
- This variability indicates that factors like location, management, and local market conditions can significantly impact performance.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully evaluate the demographics and competition in your chosen territory.
- Develop a strong business plan tailored to your local market.
- Seek guidance from the franchisor on best practices and marketing strategies.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: Table 6 (Gross Sales Data)
- Item 19: Table 8 (Average, Lowest, Median, Highest Gross Sales)
FDD Documents by Year
Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents
FDD Year: 2025
Uploaded: 8/9/2025
FDD Documents
Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year