Clarion Hotel
Hospitality
Founded 1963110 locationsCompany Profile
Year Founded:1963
Clarion Hotel Franchise Cost
| Franchise Fee: | $45,000Key Metric |
| Total Investment: | $427,000 - $2,730,000Key Metric |
| Liquid Capital: | $202,500 |
| Royalty Fee: | 6% of gross sales |
| Marketing Fee: | 3% of gross sales |
Quick ROI Calculator
Based on Clarion Hotel's actual financial data
Outlet Counts by Year
Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
Total US Locations:110
Scale relative to 1,000 locations
Franchised Units:110
Additional Information
Processing Franchise Details
Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.
Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.
Search Interests & Trends
Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis
Search Interest & Trends
No Trends Data Available
Trend analysis data for Clarion Hotel is being collected. Check back soon for insights.
AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis
Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.
14
High Risk
Critical items
35% of total
20
Medium Risk
Monitor closely
50% of total
6
Low Risk
Manageable items
15% of total
40
Total Items
Factors analyzed
10 categories
6.00
Overall Score
Low RiskHigh Risk
010
Franchisor Stability Risks
4 risks identified
2
2
Significant Decline in Clarion Brand Outlets
High
Explanation:
- Item 20, Table 1a reveals a concerning trend of declining Clarion branded outlets (Clarion Inn, Clarion Hotel, Clarion Suites, Clarion Inn & Suites, and Clarion Resort) over the past three years (2022-2024). The number of franchised outlets has decreased from 146 to 110, representing a net loss of 36 outlets (24.7%). This consistent decline raises questions about the brand's overall health, competitiveness, and attractiveness to potential franchisees.
- This decline could indicate underlying issues such as outdated brand image, ineffective marketing strategies, lack of franchisee support, or increasing competition from other hotel brands. A shrinking system can lead to reduced brand recognition, diminished bargaining power with suppliers, and a smaller pool of resources for system-wide improvements.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly investigate the reasons behind the decline by analyzing franchisee terminations, non-renewals, and closures. Conduct interviews with current and former franchisees to understand their challenges and concerns.
- Evaluate the franchisor's support programs, marketing efforts, and brand positioning to identify areas for improvement. Consider implementing new strategies to enhance brand image, attract new franchisees, and improve franchisee profitability.
- Assess the competitive landscape and identify potential threats and opportunities. Develop strategies to differentiate the Clarion brand and strengthen its market position.
- Review the FDD for any disclosures regarding the franchisor's plans to address the declining number of outlets and support existing franchisees.
FDD Citations:
- Item 20, Table 1a: "System-wide Outlet Summary For Years 2022 to 2024" shows a decline from 146 outlets in 2022 to 110 in 2024.
Competition from Within the Choice Hotels System
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 1 discloses that Choice Hotels International, the franchisor, grants franchises for numerous other hotel brands, creating potential competition for Clarion franchisees within the same system. This internal competition could impact market share and profitability for individual Clarion locations.
- The FDD states that Choice Hotels "has the right to operate and franchise these hotels at any location... and you may compete with any of our brands." This lack of territorial exclusivity could lead to market saturation and cannibalization within the Choice Hotels system.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully analyze the market demographics and competitive landscape to identify potential areas of overlap and competition with other Choice Hotels brands.
- Discuss with the franchisor their development plans for other brands in your target market and seek clarification on their strategies to minimize internal competition.
- Focus on differentiating your Clarion hotel through superior service, unique amenities, and targeted marketing efforts to attract and retain customers.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "We have the right to operate and franchise these hotels at any location in accordance with the terms of your franchise agreement and you may compete with any of our brands in the operation of your hotel."
High Number of Franchise Transfers (Clarion Brand)
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 20, Table 2a shows a relatively high number of franchise transfers for the Clarion brands. While the exact number fluctuates yearly (16 in 2022, 16 in 2023, and 5 in 2024), this level of transfer activity warrants investigation. Frequent transfers can indicate underlying issues such as franchisee dissatisfaction, financial difficulties, or operational challenges.
Potential Mitigations:
- Inquire with the franchisor about the reasons behind these transfers, specifically differentiating between voluntary and involuntary transfers. Understand the circumstances surrounding these transfers to assess potential risks.
- Research the performance and financial health of existing Clarion franchisees in similar markets to gauge the brand's viability and potential for success.
- Contact existing Clarion franchisees and inquire about their experiences with the brand and the franchisor's support system.
FDD Citations:
- Item 20, Table 2a: "Transfers of CLARION INN, CLARION HOTEL, CLARION SUITES, CLARION INN & SUITES and CLARION RESORT Outlets from Franchisees to New Owners" shows a consistent number of transfers over the three years.
Lack of Company-Owned Clarion Outlets
High
Explanation:
- Item 20, Tables 1a and 1b reveal that there are no company-owned Clarion brand outlets. While Clarion Pointe shows growth, the core Clarion brands have no corporate presence. This lack of direct investment by the franchisor in the Clarion brand raises concerns about their commitment to the brand's long-term success and their understanding of the operational challenges faced by franchisees.
- Franchisors that operate company-owned units often have a better understanding of market dynamics, operational efficiencies, and customer preferences. This knowledge can be leveraged to improve franchisee support and enhance the brand's overall performance. The absence of company-owned locations may indicate a lack of confidence in the brand's profitability or a prioritization of other brands within the Choice Hotels portfolio.
Potential Mitigations:
- Inquire with the franchisor about their rationale for not owning any Clarion branded hotels and their long-term strategy for the brand.
- Assess the franchisor's support infrastructure and training programs to ensure they adequately address the needs of franchisees in the absence of company-owned locations.
- Seek feedback from existing Clarion franchisees about the level of support and guidance they receive from the franchisor.
FDD Citations:
- Item 20, Table 1a: "System-wide Outlet Summary" shows zero company-owned outlets for Clarion Inn, Clarion Hotel, etc.
- Item 20, Table 1b: While Clarion Pointe shows company-owned outlets as zero, it's a separate brand extension and doesn't mitigate the risk for the core Clarion brand.
Disclosure & Representation Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Personal Guaranty Risk (California)
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that "Each owner of the franchise is required to execute a personal guaranty." In California, a community property state, this personal guaranty could expose the non-owner spouse's assets to risk in case of business failure. This significantly increases the financial risk for franchisees in California.
Potential Mitigations:
- **Legal Counsel:** Consult with an attorney specializing in franchise law and community property to fully understand the implications of the personal guaranty and explore options for protecting personal assets.
- **Negotiation:** Attempt to negotiate with the franchisor to limit the scope of the personal guaranty or explore alternative security arrangements.
- **Financial Planning:** Develop a robust financial plan that accounts for the potential liability associated with the personal guaranty. This should include contingency planning for potential business downturns.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit A - California Addendum: "Each owner of the franchise is required to execute a personal guaranty. Doing so could jeopardize the marital assets of non-owner spouses domiciled in community property states such as California."
Lack of DFPI Review of Website
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD explicitly states that the franchisor's website has not been reviewed or approved by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI). This raises concerns about the accuracy and reliability of information presented on the website, which potential franchisees may rely on during their decision-making process.
Potential Mitigations:
- **Independent Verification:** Do not solely rely on the website's information. Independently verify all claims and data presented on the website through other sources, including industry reports, market research, and discussions with existing franchisees.
- **Direct Communication:** Contact the franchisor directly to clarify any questions or concerns about information found on the website. Document all communications.
- **DFPI Resources:** Utilize the DFPI's website and resources to research the franchisor and understand the regulatory environment in California.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit A - California Addendum: "OUR WEBSITE HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION."
Material Modification Disclosure Requirement (California)
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD highlights the requirement under California Corporations Code, Section 31125, for the franchisor to provide a DFPI-approved disclosure document before soliciting any material modification to an existing franchise agreement. This indicates potential future changes to the franchise agreement and associated costs, which may not be fully transparent at the initial investment stage.
Potential Mitigations:
- **Due Diligence:** Thoroughly review the existing franchise agreement and understand the provisions related to modifications and amendments.
- **Legal Counsel:** Consult with a franchise attorney to understand the implications of this requirement and potential future costs associated with material modifications.
- **Financial Planning:** Factor in potential future costs associated with franchise agreement modifications when developing long-term financial projections.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit A - California Addendum: "CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS CODE, SECTION 31125 REQUIRES CHOICE HOTELS INTERNATIONAL, INC. TO GIVE YOU A DISCLOSURE DOCUMENT, APPROVED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL PROTECTION AND INNOVATION PRIOR TO A SOLICITATION OF A PROPOSED MATERIAL MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING FRANCHISE."
Financial & Fee Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Mandatory Hardware and Software Costs and Refresh Cycles
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD mandates the purchase of Dell hardware through specific vendors and the choiceADVANTAGE® system, with required refreshes every 48 months or upon warranty expiration. While estimated refresh costs are provided ($3,800-$10,800), there's no cap on actual costs or frequency, posing a significant financial burden.
- Mandatory software licenses for choiceADVANTAGE® add to the initial and ongoing technology expenses.
- The required High-Speed Internet Access solution at the front desk represents another recurring cost.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully budget for the initial hardware and software purchase, including installation and potential early replacement needs.
- Establish a reserve fund specifically for the 48-month refresh cycle, anticipating potential cost overruns beyond the estimated range.
- Negotiate favorable terms with the designated vendors, if possible, to minimize costs.
- Explore alternative internet providers to ensure competitive pricing for the required high-speed connection.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5, 7, and 11: References to mandatory hardware, software, and internet access requirements.
- "You will be required to refresh the choiceADVANTAGE® system...every 48 months...However, there is no limit on the frequency or cost of this obligation."
Minimum Purchase Requirements for Cooperative Buying Program
Low
Explanation:
- Franchisees are automatically enrolled in a cooperative buying program and must maintain an average of $500 per month in applicable purchases. Failure to meet this minimum can result in non-compliance fees, creating a financial penalty.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully evaluate the pricing and benefits of the cooperative buying program compared to alternative suppliers.
- Factor the $500 monthly minimum purchase into the operational budget to avoid non-compliance fees.
- If eligible, explore the waiver option mentioned in the FDD and assess its financial implications.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5: "An average of $500.00 per month in total applicable purchases is required. Properties that fail to meet the minimum purchasing requirements may be subject to a non-compliance fee."
High Insurance Coverage Requirements
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD outlines extensive insurance requirements, including high coverage limits for various liabilities (e.g., $5,000,000-$15,000,000 per occurrence for general liability). These high coverage levels can lead to substantial insurance premiums, impacting profitability.
- Specific requirements like cyber liability, pollution/environmental liability, and employment practices liability insurance add to the overall insurance burden.
Potential Mitigations:
- Obtain quotes from multiple insurance providers to secure the most competitive premiums for the required coverage levels.
- Implement robust risk management practices to minimize the likelihood of claims and potentially negotiate lower premiums.
- Carefully review the insurance requirements and ensure full understanding of the coverage types and limits.
FDD Citations:
- Item 7: Detailed description of required insurance policies and coverage limits.
Legal & Contract Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Superseding State Laws and Court Decisions
Medium
Explanation:
- Washington's RCW 19.100.180 may override franchise agreement terms regarding termination and renewal, creating uncertainty and potential conflict.
- Court decisions could also supersede the agreement, adding another layer of legal complexity.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review RCW 19.100.180 and relevant case law with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law.
- Negotiate specific provisions in the franchise agreement to address potential conflicts with state law, if possible.
- Understand the implications of potential overrides before signing the agreement.
FDD Citations:
- Item 2: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement...concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal..."
Mandatory Washington Jurisdiction for Disputes
Low
Explanation:
- Arbitration, mediation, or litigation related to a Washington franchise must occur in Washington or a mutually agreed location, potentially increasing travel and legal costs for franchisees outside the state.
Potential Mitigations:
- Factor potential travel and legal costs associated with Washington jurisdiction into the overall investment assessment.
- Negotiate for a more favorable jurisdiction if possible, though the FDD suggests this may be difficult.
FDD Citations:
- Item 3: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon..."
Voiding of Certain Release and Waiver Provisions
Medium
Explanation:
- Releases or waivers of rights under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act are generally void, except under specific circumstances involving negotiated settlements with independent counsel.
- This limits the franchisor's ability to enforce certain waivers and protects franchisee rights.
Potential Mitigations:
- Understand the limitations on waivers and releases under Washington law.
- Seek legal counsel before signing any release or waiver.
FDD Citations:
- Item 4: "A release or waiver of rights...purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act...is void..."
Territory & Competition Risks
5 risks identified
2
2
1
No Exclusive Territory
High
Explanation:
- The FDD explicitly states that franchises are granted for specific sites only, with no guarantee of an exclusive territory. This means you could face direct competition from other Clarion franchisees, company-owned Clarion hotels, or even other Choice Hotels brands in the same area.
- This lack of territorial protection can significantly impact your market share and revenue potential, especially in densely populated areas or popular tourist destinations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the existing hotel landscape in your target area before signing the franchise agreement. Identify the number and proximity of competing hotels, including other Clarion locations and other Choice brands.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for a preferred region or exclusive territory, although the FDD indicates these are not customary. Highlight your experience, investment level, and potential to contribute to the brand's success.
- Develop a strong local marketing strategy to differentiate your hotel from competitors. Focus on unique amenities, superior customer service, or targeted promotions to attract and retain guests.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "You will not receive an exclusive territory. You may face competition from other franchisees, from outlets that we own, or from other channels of distribution or competitive brands that we control."
- Item 12: "We expressly reserve the right to grant franchises or open company-owned hotels at any location under any brand name other than the location specified in your franchise agreement."
Competition from Other Choice Brands
High
Explanation:
- Clarion is part of Choice Hotels International, which franchises a wide portfolio of hotel brands. The FDD states that Choice Hotels has the right to franchise any of its brands in any location, meaning you could face competition from other Choice brands in your area, even if you are granted a preferred region for the Clarion brand.
- This inter-brand competition can dilute the market and make it harder to attract guests, especially if other Choice brands offer similar pricing or amenities.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully analyze the market positioning of other Choice brands in your target area. Understand their pricing strategies, target demographics, and strengths and weaknesses.
- Leverage the Clarion brand's unique selling propositions and target a specific niche market to differentiate yourself from other Choice brands.
- Collaborate with other Choice franchisees in your area to create joint marketing campaigns or cross-promotional offers that benefit all parties.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "We may open company-owned hotels under any brand and offer hotel franchises for upscale, mid-priced and budget hotels under any of the Choice Marks."
- Item 12: "We have the right to operate and franchise these hotels at any location in accordance with the terms of your franchise agreement and you may compete with any of our brands in the operation of your hotel."
No Right of First Refusal for Additional Franchises
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD states that Choice Hotels does not customarily grant franchisees options, rights of first refusal, or similar rights to acquire additional franchises. This means that if you want to expand your business by opening another Clarion hotel in a nearby location, you will have no preferential treatment and will have to compete with other potential franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Discuss your expansion plans with the franchisor early on and express your interest in acquiring additional franchises in the future. While there's no guarantee, open communication can help build a stronger relationship and potentially increase your chances of being considered for future opportunities.
- Continuously monitor the market for potential expansion opportunities and be prepared to act quickly if a desirable location becomes available.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "Customarily, we do not grant to franchisees options, rights of first refusal or similar rights to acquire additional franchises."
Competition from Alternative Distribution Channels
Medium
Explanation:
- Choice Hotels reserves the right to take reservations for rooms through various alternative distribution channels, including online travel agencies, its own website, and other direct marketing methods. While you will receive reservations made on your behalf, you will not receive compensation for bookings made through these channels that are not directed to your hotel.
- This can lead to potential conflicts and reduced revenue if guests book rooms through these channels at lower rates than those offered directly by your hotel.
Potential Mitigations:
- Maintain competitive pricing and offer attractive packages and promotions to encourage guests to book directly with your hotel.
- Actively manage your online presence and ensure your hotel is prominently featured on Choice Hotels' website and other relevant online platforms.
- Focus on providing exceptional customer service to build loyalty and encourage repeat bookings directly with your hotel.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "We may take reservations for rooms through any method of distribution... You will receive no compensation for our sales through Alternative Distribution Channels, unless we make a reservation on your behalf."
Termination of Preferred Region/Exclusive Territory
Low
Explanation:
- Even if you are granted a preferred region or exclusive territory, the FDD states that this can be terminated by Choice Hotels if you default under the franchise agreement, including failing to maintain quality standards or failing to pay franchise fees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Strictly adhere to the terms of the franchise agreement, including maintaining quality standards and paying franchise fees on time.
- Proactively address any issues or concerns raised by the franchisor regarding quality or performance.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "Our grant of a preferred region or exclusive territory can be terminated by us if you default under your franchise agreement, including failing to maintain quality standards or failing to pay franchise fees due on a timely basis."
Regulatory & Compliance Risks
6 risks identified
1
3
2
Intense Competition within Choice Hotel Brands
High
Explanation:
- The FDD discloses that franchisees may face competition from other Choice Hotel brands, including company-owned and franchised locations. The sheer number of brands listed (Ascend, Cambria, Clarion, Comfort Inn, etc.) indicates a highly competitive landscape even within the Choice Hotels system.
- This internal competition can significantly impact revenue and occupancy rates, especially if multiple Choice brands are located in close proximity.
- The lack of physically separate offices or training facilities for competing brands may exacerbate resource allocation issues and potentially create conflicts of interest.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully analyze the existing market and the proximity of other Choice Hotel brands before selecting a location.
- Negotiate a protected territory or area of primary responsibility within the franchise agreement to limit direct competition from other Choice brands.
- Develop a strong local marketing strategy to differentiate the franchised hotel from other Choice brands in the area.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "We have the right to operate and franchise these hotels at any location...and you may compete with any of our brands...Those hotels could be company-owned, franchised, or both."
- Item 1: "We do not maintain physically separate offices or training facilities for the other Choice brands that may compete with your hotel."
Dependence on Choice Privileges Loyalty Program
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD highlights the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program as a significant revenue driver. Heavy reliance on this program creates a dependence on Choice Hotels' marketing efforts and the program's continued success.
- Changes to the program's structure, rewards, or member benefits could negatively impact the franchisee's ability to attract and retain customers.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop supplementary local marketing and loyalty programs to reduce dependence on the Choice Privileges program.
- Closely monitor changes and updates to the Choice Privileges program and adapt marketing strategies accordingly.
- Actively participate in and promote the Choice Privileges program to maximize its benefits.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8, Critical Audit Matter: "Accounting for Choice Privileges Loyalty Program...The Company recognized $123.2 million in revenues from loyalty points redeemed..."
Complexity of Loyalty Program Accounting
Medium
Explanation:
- The auditor's report identifies the accounting for the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program as a "Critical Audit Matter" due to the complexity of the models and estimations involved.
- This complexity could lead to difficulties in understanding and reconciling the franchisee's share of revenue generated through the program.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request detailed explanations and training from Choice Hotels on the accounting methods used for the loyalty program.
- Consult with an independent accountant specializing in franchise accounting to review and verify the accuracy of loyalty program revenue calculations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8, Critical Audit Matter: "Auditing the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program results is complex due to: (1) the complexity of the models used...; and (2) the complexity of estimating the future redemption rate."
No Disclosed Bankruptcy Information
Low
Explanation:
- While not necessarily a risk in itself, the absence of any bankruptcy information in Item 4 limits the franchisee's ability to assess the franchisor's financial stability over time.
Potential Mitigations:
- Conduct independent research on Choice Hotels' financial history, including any past bankruptcies or restructuring, through publicly available resources.
FDD Citations:
- Item 4: "No bankruptcy information is required to be disclosed in this Item."
Potential Impact of Franchisor's Financial Performance
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD includes audited financial statements, which provide insight into the franchisor's financial health. Any negative trends or instability in the franchisor's financials could indirectly impact the franchisee's success through reduced support, marketing efforts, or brand reputation.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements and consult with a financial advisor to assess their financial health and stability.
- Monitor the franchisor's financial performance through publicly available information and industry reports.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "Consolidated Financial Statements"
Reliance on Third-Party Vendors
Low
Explanation:
- The mention of "Platform and procurement services fees" in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Item 8) suggests reliance on third-party vendors for certain services. Disruptions or issues with these vendors could impact hotel operations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Inquire about the specific third-party vendors used and their contractual agreements with Choice Hotels.
- Assess the potential risks associated with these vendors and consider backup plans for essential services.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8, Consolidated Statements of Income: "Platform and procurement services fees"
Franchisor Support Risks
6 risks identified
2
3
1
Encroachment and Competition from Other Choice Brands
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that Choice Hotels, its affiliates, and other franchisees can use Alternative Distribution Channels to sell products/services under different Choice brands within your territory. This creates potential for intra-brand competition and encroachment, impacting your market share and revenue.
- The lack of clarity on the approval process for using Alternative Distribution Channels (mentioned in Item 11) adds to the uncertainty and potential for conflict.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review Item 1 and Item 11 of the FDD to understand the specifics of Alternative Distribution Channels, permitted brands, and the approval process.
- Consult with existing franchisees about their experiences with intra-brand competition and encroachment.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for clearer territorial protections or limitations on the use of Alternative Distribution Channels within your territory.
FDD Citations:
- "We, our affiliates and franchisees can use Alternative Distribution Channels to make sales anywhere (including within your territory, if applicable) of products or services under trademarks different from the trademarks that you are permitted to use under your franchise agreement. See Item 1 for additional information on other Choice brands."
- "You may use Alternative Distribution Channels to make sales if you comply with all of our standards, including any approval process that we may require (see Item 11)."
Weak Territorial Protections
High
Explanation:
- The Fair Franchising Policy (Exhibit K) and Incremental Impact Policy (Exhibit L) are presented as guidelines, not contractual obligations. The franchisor can change or revoke these policies at its discretion, leaving franchisees vulnerable to increased competition and encroachment.
- The Incremental Impact Policy only applies to certain Choice brands, potentially leaving some franchisees with even less protection.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review Exhibits K and L to understand the limitations of the current protections.
- Consult with a franchise attorney to assess the risks associated with non-contractual policies.
- Consider negotiating stronger territorial protections within the franchise agreement itself.
FDD Citations:
- "Both the Incremental Impact Policy and the Fair Franchising Policy are internal policies, not contractual obligations, and can be changed or revoked by us in our sole discretion and at any time on reasonable notice."
- "The Incremental Impact Policy is only offered to certain Choice brands."
Dependence on Choice Privileges Loyalty Program
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD (Item 8) highlights the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program as a significant revenue driver. Heavy reliance on this program creates a dependence on the franchisor's marketing efforts and program management. Changes to the program or its popularity could significantly impact franchisee revenue.
Potential Mitigations:
- Analyze the historical performance and stability of the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program.
- Develop local marketing strategies to attract customers independent of the loyalty program.
- Understand the terms and conditions of the loyalty program and any potential impact of changes on your business.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements: Discussion of Choice Privileges Loyalty Program revenue recognition and liabilities.
Complexity of Loyalty Program Accounting
Medium
Explanation:
- The auditor's report in Item 8 identifies the accounting for the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program as a "Critical Audit Matter" due to the complexity of the models and estimations involved. This complexity could lead to discrepancies or disputes regarding revenue recognition and royalty calculations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a financial advisor experienced in franchise accounting to understand the complexities of the loyalty program's financial impact.
- Request clear and detailed explanations from the franchisor regarding the calculation of loyalty program-related revenues and expenses.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8, Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm: "Critical Audit Matter - Accounting for Choice Privileges Loyalty Program"
Potential for Disputes with Franchisor
Medium
Explanation:
- While the Fair Franchising Policy (Exhibit K) mentions guidelines for dispute resolution, it lacks specifics and is not a contractual obligation. This raises concerns about the effectiveness and fairness of the dispute resolution process should conflicts arise with the franchisor.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a franchise attorney to understand your rights and options in case of disputes.
- Consider negotiating for more specific and binding dispute resolution mechanisms within the franchise agreement.
- Research the franchisor's history of disputes with franchisees.
FDD Citations:
- "We have implemented a Fair Franchising Policy (attached as Exhibit K) that sets general guidelines on how Choice will maintain the overall Choice franchise system of brands, including principles for informal resolution of disputes between Choice and our franchisees."
Franchisor's Financial Performance
Low
Explanation:
- Item 8 provides financial statements, but a thorough analysis is needed to assess the franchisor's long-term financial health and stability. A financially weak franchisor may be less able to provide adequate support and resources to its franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Engage a financial professional to review the franchisor's financial statements and assess their financial stability.
- Compare the franchisor's financial performance to industry benchmarks.
- Inquire about the franchisor's future plans and financial projections.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.
Exit & Transfer Risks
4 risks identified
2
2
Restrictive Transfer Provisions Under Washington Law
Medium
Explanation:
- Washington law (RCW 19.100.180) may supersede franchise agreement provisions regarding termination and renewal, potentially impacting transfer rights and creating uncertainty.
- Releases or waivers of rights related to transfers are void under certain circumstances (RCW 19.100.220(2)), limiting the franchisor's ability to enforce certain transfer restrictions.
- Transfer fees are restricted to reasonable costs (Item 6), potentially impacting profitability upon exit.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchise agreement and Washington law (RCW 19.100.180 and 19.100.220(2)) with legal counsel specializing in franchise law in Washington to understand potential limitations on transfer rights.
- Negotiate clear and favorable transfer terms within the franchise agreement, considering the limitations imposed by Washington law.
- Factor in potential limitations on transfer fees when evaluating the investment and exit strategy.
FDD Citations:
- Item 2: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement or related agreements concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise."
- Item 4: "In addition, any such release or waiver executed in connection with a renewal or transfer of a franchise is likewise void except as provided for in RCW 19.100.220(2)."
- Item 6: "Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor’s reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer."
Limited Buy-Back Provisions Under Washington Law
High
Explanation:
- Washington law (RCW 19.100.180(2)(j)) prohibits franchisors from repurchasing the franchisee's business without consent, except for termination for good cause. This significantly limits the franchisor's ability to control the transfer process and potentially impacts the franchisee's exit options.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law to fully understand the implications of RCW 19.100.180(2)(j) on potential exit strategies.
- Negotiate clear terms within the franchise agreement regarding termination for good cause and the process for potential buy-backs, ensuring alignment with Washington law.
- Develop a comprehensive exit strategy that considers the limitations on buy-backs and explores alternative exit options.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "Provisions in franchise agreements or related agreements that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee’s business for any reason during the term of the franchise agreement without the franchisee’s consent are unlawful pursuant to RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), unless the franchise is terminated for good cause."
Non-Competition and Non-Solicitation Restrictions in Washington
Medium
Explanation:
- Washington law (RCW 49.62.020 and 49.62.030) limits the enforceability of non-competition covenants based on earnings thresholds, potentially impacting the franchisee's ability to protect their business upon exit.
- Washington law (RCW 49.62.060) prohibits franchisors from restricting franchisees from soliciting or hiring employees of the franchisor or other franchisees, potentially impacting the franchisee's ability to transition employees during a sale or transfer.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with legal counsel specializing in Washington employment and franchise law to understand the limitations on non-competition and non-solicitation agreements.
- Structure any non-competition agreements carefully to comply with Washington law's earnings thresholds and duration limits.
- Develop alternative strategies for protecting the business's goodwill and customer base upon exit, such as strong customer relationships and non-disclosure agreements.
FDD Citations:
- Item 14: "Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an employee…"
- Item 15: "RCW 49.62.060 prohibits a franchisor from restricting, restraining, or prohibiting a franchisee from (i) soliciting or hiring any employee of a franchisee of the same franchisor or (ii) soliciting or hiring any employee of the franchisor."
Termination and Renewal Rights Under Wisconsin Law
High
Explanation:
- Wisconsin's Fair Dealership Law (Section 135.04) may supersede the franchise agreement's provisions regarding termination and renewal, potentially impacting the franchisee's control over the duration of the franchise and exit options.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with legal counsel specializing in Wisconsin franchise law to understand the implications of Section 135.04 of the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law on termination and renewal rights.
- Carefully review the franchise agreement and ensure it aligns with Wisconsin law regarding termination and renewal.
- Develop a comprehensive business plan that considers the potential impact of Wisconsin's Fair Dealership Law on the long-term viability and exit strategy for the franchise.
FDD Citations:
- Wisconsin Addendum Item 1: "To the extent any of the provisions regarding notice of termination or change in dealership are in conflict with Section 135.04 of the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law, the Wisconsin law shall apply."
Operational & Brand Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Dependence on Choice Privileges Loyalty Program
High
Explanation:
- Clarion Hotel's success is significantly tied to the Choice Privileges loyalty program. A decline in program participation or changes in program structure could negatively impact hotel bookings and revenue.
- The FDD highlights the complexity of accounting for the loyalty program, suggesting potential challenges in managing and forecasting its impact on financial performance.
- The auditor's identification of the loyalty program accounting as a "Critical Audit Matter" underscores the inherent risks and complexities associated with it.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop local marketing and promotional strategies to attract guests outside of the loyalty program.
- Closely monitor program performance metrics and adapt strategies to maintain engagement.
- Maintain open communication with Choice Hotels regarding program changes and advocate for franchisee interests.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8, Page 53: "Accounting for Choice Privileges Loyalty Program" is identified as a Critical Audit Matter.
- Item 8, Page 53: Discussion of the complexity of the loyalty program's accounting model and the estimation of future redemption rates.
Financial Performance of Franchisor
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor's financial stability directly impacts its ability to provide ongoing support and resources to franchisees. Any financial distress at the franchisor level could disrupt operations, marketing efforts, and brand reputation.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements in Item 8 to assess its financial health and stability.
- Seek independent financial advice to understand the implications of the franchisor's financial position.
- Engage with other franchisees to share insights and concerns about the franchisor's financial performance.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: Contains the franchisor's consolidated financial statements, including income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements.
Complex Revenue Recognition for Loyalty Program
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD describes a complex revenue recognition process for the Choice Privileges loyalty program, involving estimates of future redemption rates and actuarial methods. This complexity increases the risk of errors or misstatements in financial reporting, which could impact franchisee profitability and planning.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request detailed information from the franchisor about the loyalty program's revenue recognition process.
- Consult with an accountant specializing in revenue recognition to understand the potential implications for your franchise.
- Implement strong internal controls to track loyalty program revenue and expenses.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8, Page 53: Description of the complex accounting for the Choice Privileges Loyalty Program, including the use of actuarial methods and estimates of future redemption rates.
Performance & ROI Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Wide Range in Financial Performance
High
Explanation:
- Item 19 shows a significant disparity between the highest and lowest performing hotels in the Performance Sample. The high occupancy of 100% and RevPAR of $135.00 contrasts sharply with the low occupancy of 8.8% and RevPAR of $6.57. This wide range indicates that achieving high performance is not guaranteed and external factors or management practices significantly influence profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Conduct thorough due diligence on the specific market and location being considered. Analyze local competition, demand drivers, and potential for growth.
- Develop a robust business plan with realistic projections based on conservative estimates within the performance range. Prepare for potential downside scenarios.
- Seek expert advice on hotel management and revenue optimization strategies. Consider hiring experienced staff or engaging consultants to maximize revenue potential.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19, Table 1: "Low" performance figures for Occupancy Rate (8.8%), ADR ($50.21), and RevPAR ($6.57) compared to "High" figures of 100%, $203.01, and $135.00 respectively.
Reliance on Choice Privileges Program
Medium
Explanation:
- A substantial portion of revenue is derived from the Choice Privileges program (median 42.7% contribution). Over-reliance on this program creates vulnerability to changes in program terms, customer loyalty shifts, or competitive loyalty programs.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop a diversified marketing strategy to attract guests outside of the Choice Privileges program. Explore local partnerships, online marketing, and targeted advertising.
- Actively manage online reputation and reviews to attract direct bookings.
- Offer competitive amenities and services to differentiate from other Choice Hotels properties and attract a wider customer base.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19, Table 2: "Choice Privileges Contribution" median of 42.7%.
No Assurance of Profitability
High
Explanation:
- The FDD explicitly states that there's no assurance of achieving similar results to the presented data. Individual results may differ, and some hotels may not achieve profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Conduct a thorough financial analysis and develop realistic projections based on conservative assumptions. Account for all potential costs and expenses.
- Secure adequate financing to cover startup costs and potential operating losses during the initial period.
- Continuously monitor financial performance and adjust operations as needed to maximize profitability.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "Some franchised CLARION hotels have earned the results indicated above. Your individual results may differ. There is no assurance that you will earn as much."
FDD Documents by Year
Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents
FDD Year: 2025
Uploaded: 8/8/2025
FDD Documents
Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year