Bar-B-Clean logo

    Bar-B-Clean

    Home Services
    Founded 201278 locations
    Company Profile
    Year Founded:2012

    Bar-B-Clean Franchise Cost

    Franchise Fee:$49,500Key Metric
    Total Investment:$78,000 - $137,000Key Metric
    Liquid Capital:$20,000
    Royalty Fee:6% of gross sales
    Marketing Fee:2% of gross sales
    Quick ROI Calculator
    Based on Bar-B-Clean's actual financial data
    Outlet Counts by Year
    Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
    Total US Locations:78

    Scale relative to 1,000 locations

    Franchised Units:77
    Corporate Units:1
    Additional Information

    Processing Franchise Details

    Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.

    Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.

    Search Interests & Trends

    Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis

    Search Interest & Trends

    No Trends Data Available

    Trend analysis data for Bar-B-Clean is being collected. Check back soon for insights.

    AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis

    Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.

    11
    High Risk
    Critical items
    29% of total
    22
    Medium Risk
    Monitor closely
    58% of total
    5
    Low Risk
    Manageable items
    13% of total
    38
    Total Items
    Factors analyzed
    10 categories
    5.79
    Overall Score
    Low RiskHigh Risk
    010

    Franchisor Stability Risks

    6 risks identified

    2
    3
    1

    Limited Operating History and Lack of Direct Business Experience

    High

    Explanation:

    • Bar-B-Clean Franchising Inc. (BFI) was founded relatively recently in 2012 and began franchising in 2013. This limited operating history presents a risk as the long-term viability and success of the franchise model are yet unproven.
    • Item 1 explicitly states, "We do not conduct, and have never conducted, a business of the type described in this Franchise Disclosure Document." This lack of direct operating experience in the barbecue cleaning business raises concerns about BFI's ability to effectively support and guide franchisees, develop successful operating procedures, and adapt to market changes.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly research the management team's background and experience in franchising and related industries. Look for evidence of successful business ventures, even if not directly in barbecue cleaning.
    • Carefully analyze the provided financial statements (Item 21) to assess BFI's financial health and stability. Look for positive trends and sufficient capitalization to support franchisee growth and system-wide support.
    • Contact existing franchisees (Exhibit C) and inquire about their experiences with BFI's support, training, and the overall profitability of their businesses. Focus on franchisees who have been operating for a longer period.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 1: "BFI is a corporation formed in California on December 17, 2012. We offer franchises... since March 2013."
    • Item 1: "We do not conduct, and have never conducted, a business of the type described in this Franchise Disclosure Document."
    • Item 21: "Exhibit B contains the financial statements..."

    Rapid Franchise Expansion

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 20 reveals a significant projected increase in franchise outlets from 28 in 2024 to a projected 77, representing a 175% growth. Such rapid expansion can strain the franchisor's resources, potentially leading to inadequate training and support for new franchisees, diluted brand recognition, and increased competition among franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about BFI's plans for managing this rapid growth, including training programs, support staff, and marketing initiatives. Seek evidence of scalable infrastructure and resources.
    • Investigate the projected geographic distribution of new franchises to assess potential market saturation and cannibalization in your target area.
    • Review the franchise agreement for provisions related to territorial exclusivity and protection against encroachment from other franchisees.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 1: "Systemwide Outlet Summary... Net Change +49"
    • Item 20, Table 5: "Projected New Franchised Outlets in the Next Fiscal Year 18"

    Franchisee Non-Renewals

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 3 shows 5 non-renewals in California in 2024. While the overall number of franchises is relatively small, this represents a significant percentage and warrants further investigation. Non-renewals could indicate underlying issues with franchisee satisfaction, profitability, or support from the franchisor.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Contact the former franchisees listed in Exhibit C, specifically those who did not renew, and inquire about their reasons for leaving the system. Understand their experiences and challenges.
    • Analyze the franchise agreement for renewal terms and conditions. Ensure they are fair and reasonable.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 3: "Status of Franchised Outlets... California... Non-Renewals 5"
    • Item 20: "The name and last known address and telephone number of every current franchisee and every franchisee who has had a Bar-B-Clean Franchise terminated, cancelled, not renewed... is listed in Exhibit C."

    Concentrated Franchisee Locations

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 3 indicates a significant concentration of franchisees in a few states, particularly California and Texas. This geographic concentration can create increased competition among franchisees and heighten the impact of regional economic downturns or market-specific challenges on the overall franchise system.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Research the market conditions and competitive landscape in your target area. Assess the potential for success given the existing density of Bar-B-Clean franchises.
    • Discuss with the franchisor their plans for future expansion and how they intend to manage competition among franchisees in concentrated markets.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 3: "Status of Franchised Outlets" (Review state-specific data)

    Confidentiality Agreements with Franchisees

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20 discloses that some franchisees have signed confidentiality agreements that may restrict their ability to speak openly about their experiences. This can make it difficult for prospective franchisees to obtain unbiased information and assess the true risks and rewards of joining the system.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Seek legal counsel to review any confidentiality provisions presented by the franchisor. Understand the implications for your ability to communicate with other franchisees and access important information.
    • Be persistent in contacting current and former franchisees, even if some are restricted by confidentiality agreements. Focus on open-ended questions and try to gather as much information as possible from those who are willing to speak.
    • Utilize online forums and social media platforms to connect with other prospective and current franchisees and gather information outside of official channels.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20: "In some instances, current and former franchisees may sign provisions restricting their ability to speak openly about their experiences with Bar-B-Clean."

    Reliance on Affiliate for Company-Owned Operations

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 4 indicates that the company-owned outlet is operated by an affiliate, CNC Financial. While not inherently negative, this structure introduces a potential risk related to the affiliate's financial stability and operational expertise. Any issues faced by CNC Financial could indirectly impact the franchisor and the overall franchise system.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Research CNC Financial's background and financial stability. Seek information about their experience in operating businesses similar to Bar-B-Clean.
    • Inquire about the contractual arrangements between BFI and CNC Financial, and how potential risks related to the affiliate's performance are mitigated.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 4: "*Owned and operated by our affiliate, CNC Financial."

    Disclosure & Representation Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Misrepresentation of Franchisor's Assistance

    High

    Explanation:

    • Franchisor's stated assistance in site selection may not be as comprehensive as expected. The phrase "may assist" creates ambiguity and doesn't guarantee active involvement.
    • Lack of clarity on the extent of assistance could lead to difficulties in securing a suitable location, impacting business launch and profitability.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request specific examples of past site selection assistance provided to other franchisees.
    • Clarify in writing the exact nature and extent of Franchisor's involvement in the site selection process.
    • Negotiate for more concrete commitments regarding site selection support in the Franchise Agreement.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 6, Section 6.1: "We may assist you in selecting a site for your Bar-B-Clean Business."

    Unilateral Marketing Fund Control

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Franchisor has complete control over the marketing fund and its expenditures, with no franchisee representation or voting rights.
    • This lack of transparency and input could lead to ineffective marketing campaigns or spending on initiatives that don't benefit individual franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request detailed annual marketing plans and budgets for review.
    • Inquire about the process for evaluating marketing campaign effectiveness.
    • Seek legal advice to understand the implications of the Franchisor's sole discretion over the marketing fund.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11, Section 11.2: "We have sole discretion over all advertising and marketing expenditures."

    Limited Territorial Protection

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • While the FDD mentions a designated territory, the Franchisor retains broad rights to operate and license other channels, including online sales, which could directly compete with the franchisee.
    • This could lead to market cannibalization and reduced sales potential for the franchisee.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Clearly define the territory boundaries and any exclusions in the Franchise Agreement.
    • Negotiate for restrictions on the Franchisor's online sales activities within the territory.
    • Understand the implications of the Franchisor's reserved rights and their potential impact on business performance.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 3: "We exclusively reserve the Internet as a channel of distribution for us, and you may not independently market on the Internet or conduct e-commerce;"

    Financial & Fee Risks

    5 risks identified

    1
    3
    1

    Franchisor Financial Instability (Indicated by Fee Deferral)

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD reveals that several states (South Dakota, Washington) have imposed mandatory deferral of the initial franchise fee due to the franchisor's financial condition. This strongly suggests potential financial instability and raises concerns about the franchisor's ability to meet its obligations and support franchisees.
    • The prorated collection of the initial franchise fee for multi-unit franchises in Washington further emphasizes the franchisor's financial constraints.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly analyze the franchisor's financial statements (Item 21). Look for trends in revenue, expenses, and profitability. Compare these figures to industry benchmarks.
    • Consult with a financial advisor to assess the franchisor's financial health and the potential implications of the fee deferral.
    • Inquire with the franchisor about the specific reasons for the imposed fee deferrals and their plans for achieving financial stability.
    • Contact existing franchisees in the states with mandatory deferrals to understand their experiences and perspectives on the franchisor's financial situation.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 5 & 7: Amendment regarding initial franchise fee deferral.
    • Item 22: "The State of Washington has imposed a financial condition..." and "...the State of Washington requires that the collection of the initial franchise fee be prorated...".

    Potential for Liquidated Damages Clause to be Deemed a Penalty

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • In Washington, the liquidated damages provision, which includes brand fund contributions (Item 6), may be unenforceable if deemed a penalty. This could limit the franchisor's ability to recoup damages in case of breach of contract and create uncertainty for franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Consult with a legal professional specializing in franchise law in Washington state to understand the implications and potential risks associated with this provision.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to revise the liquidated damages clause to ensure it is reasonable and enforceable under Washington law.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19: "A liquidated damages provision in a Franchise Agreement may be construed as a penalty under Washington law…".
    • Item 6: (Review for details of the liquidated damages provision and brand fund contributions).

    Reliance on Franchise Brokers

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor uses franchise brokers, who are paid for selling franchises. This creates a potential conflict of interest, as brokers may prioritize their commission over providing objective information to prospective franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct independent research on the franchise and the franchisor, including reviewing the FDD thoroughly.
    • Contact existing and former franchisees directly to get unbiased perspectives on their experiences.
    • Verify any information provided by the broker with the franchisor directly.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 21: "Use of Franchise Brokers. The franchisor uses the services of franchise brokers…".

    Variations in State Franchise Laws

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD includes numerous state-specific addenda, indicating variations in franchise laws and regulations across different states. This complexity can make it challenging to understand the legal landscape and ensure compliance.
    • Specifically, the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law supersedes conflicting provisions in the Franchise Agreement, and certain waivers or disclaimers are prohibited.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the applicable addendum for your specific state.
    • Consult with a legal professional specializing in franchise law in your state to understand the implications of state-specific regulations.

    FDD Citations:

    • Applicable Addenda Section: Lists specific state addenda.
    • Wisconsin Addendum: Details the impact of Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law.

    Potential Contract Changes

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The contracts in Exhibit H, marked as "Sample," are subject to change. This creates uncertainty about the final terms and conditions franchisees will be bound by.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request clarification from the franchisor regarding any anticipated changes to the sample contracts.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to lock in specific terms and conditions or obtain assurances regarding future changes.
    • Consult with a legal professional to review the sample contracts and assess potential risks.

    FDD Citations:

    • Exhibit H: "The following contracts… are subject to change at any time."

    Legal & Contract Risks

    3 risks identified

    2
    1

    Superseding State Law (WA)

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) may override certain provisions in the franchise agreement, particularly regarding termination and renewal. This creates uncertainty about the enforceability of the contract as written.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the WA FIPA and compare it to the franchise agreement with legal counsel specializing in franchise law in Washington.
    • Seek clarification from the franchisor on how they address potential conflicts between the agreement and WA state law.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 2: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the franchise agreement...concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise."

    Mandatory Arbitration/Litigation Venue (WA)

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Disputes may be required to be resolved in Washington, potentially incurring additional travel and legal costs for franchisees outside of WA.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Factor potential travel and legal costs associated with a WA venue into your budget.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor for a more convenient venue if possible.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 3: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington..."

    Invalidity of Certain Releases and Waivers (WA)

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Certain releases or waivers of rights under the WA FIPA are void, except under specific circumstances (negotiated settlement with independent counsel). This limits the franchisor's ability to enforce certain provisions and protects the franchisee's rights.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Understand the limitations on releases and waivers under WA law.
    • Consult with independent legal counsel before signing any release or waiver.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 4: "A release or waiver of rights...purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act...is void..."

    Territory & Competition Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Limited Territory Size and Potential for Over-Saturation

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states that a standard territory includes up to 75,000 households with incomes of $60,000 and above. In densely populated areas, the territory may be small, potentially limiting the customer base and increasing competition.
    • The franchisor's criteria for determining territory size (demographics, census data, or other methods) lack transparency and could result in smaller than expected territories.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully analyze the demographics and market potential of the assigned territory before signing the franchise agreement. Request clarification on the specific methodology used to define the territory and negotiate for a larger area if necessary.
    • Research the competitive landscape within the assigned territory and surrounding areas to assess the potential for market saturation.
    • Consider the population density and income levels within the territory to ensure sufficient customer potential.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "A standard Territory generally includes up to 75,000 households with incomes of $60,000 and above."
    • Item 12: "The Territory is determined based on territory mapping technology demographics, the latest census data, or by other methods of our choosing..."

    Franchisor's Right to Compete and Encroach on Territory

    High

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor and its affiliates retain the right to operate and license others to operate Bar-B-Clean Businesses outside the franchisee's territory, even if it impacts the franchisee's business.
    • The franchisor can use the same marks and system to sell similar products and services through alternative distribution channels (e.g., internet, catalog sales) within or outside the territory.
    • The franchisor can engage in mergers, acquisitions, or conversions with competing businesses, potentially introducing new competition within the territory (though not under the Bar-B-Clean brand).

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Negotiate for stricter territorial protections in the franchise agreement, although the FDD suggests this may be difficult.
    • Thoroughly understand the franchisor's rights and potential competitive actions outlined in the FDD.
    • Develop a strong local marketing strategy to build brand loyalty and customer base within the territory.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "We, and our affiliates, have the right to operate, and to license others to operate, Bar-B-Clean Businesses at any location outside the Territory..."
    • Item 12: "to use the Marks and the System to sell any products or services, similar to those which you will sell, through any alternate channels of distribution within or outside of the Territory."
    • Item 12: "to engage in any transaction...with any business...that competes directly with your Bar-B-Clean Business, whether located inside or outside of your Territory..."

    Restrictions on Marketing and Sales Channels

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Franchisees are prohibited from marketing or soliciting customers outside their territory without written consent.
    • Franchisees are restricted from selling products through wholesale, internet, or mail-order sales. The franchisor reserves the internet as an exclusive distribution channel.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Clarify with the franchisor the specific conditions under which consent would be granted for marketing outside the territory.
    • Focus on developing strong local marketing strategies within the assigned territory.
    • Explore alternative marketing channels allowed within the franchise agreement.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "You are prohibited from directly marketing to or soliciting customers whose principal residence is outside of your Territory, without first getting our written consent."
    • Item 12: "You may not sell products through other channels of distribution such as wholesale, Internet or mail order sales. We exclusively reserve the Internet as a channel of distribution for us..."

    Regulatory & Compliance Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Franchisor's Negative Stockholder's Equity

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD discloses that the franchisor's stockholder's equity is negative $(629,524) as of December 31, 2023. This raises significant concerns about the franchisor's financial stability and ability to support franchisees. A negative equity position suggests the franchisor's liabilities exceed its assets, which could indicate financial distress and potentially impact the franchisor's ability to fulfill its obligations to franchisees, such as providing training, support, and marketing resources.
    • This is particularly concerning given the estimated initial investment ranging from $78,200 to $833,700, which exceeds the franchisor's stockholders' equity. This disparity raises questions about the franchisor's ability to meet its financial obligations and support the growth of the franchise system.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request updated financial statements from the franchisor to assess their current financial position. Analyze these statements carefully, paying close attention to trends in revenue, expenses, and liabilities.
    • Inquire about the reasons for the negative stockholder's equity and the franchisor's plans to address this issue. Seek clarification on how they plan to fund future operations and support franchisees.
    • Consult with a financial advisor to evaluate the franchisor's financial health and the potential risks associated with investing in a franchise with negative stockholder's equity.

    FDD Citations:

    • Additional Disclosure in Item 8 and Item 17.h: "Estimated Initial Investment. The franchisee will be required to make an estimated initial investment ranging from $78,200 to $833,700. This amount exceeds the franchisor’s stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2023, which is $(629,524)."

    Limited Operating History of Franchisor

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor, Bar-B-Clean Franchising Inc., was formed in 2012 and began offering franchises in March 2013. This relatively short operating history as a franchisor presents a risk as there is limited demonstrable experience in successfully managing and supporting a franchise system.
    • The lack of long-term performance data makes it difficult to assess the franchisor's ability to adapt to changing market conditions, provide ongoing support to franchisees, and maintain a profitable business model.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly research the management team's experience and background in franchising and the specific industry. Look for evidence of prior successful franchise operations.
    • Speak with existing franchisees to gain insights into their experiences with the franchisor, including the level of support received, the effectiveness of the training program, and the overall profitability of their businesses.
    • Carefully review the FDD for any disclosures regarding litigation, bankruptcy, or other financial difficulties that may indicate potential challenges for the franchisor.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 1: "BFI is a corporation formed in California on December 17, 2012...We offer franchises...and have done so since March 2013."

    Franchisor Lack of Direct Operating Experience

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 1 states, "We do not conduct, and have never conducted, a business of the type described in this Franchise Disclosure Document." This indicates that the franchisor has no direct operating experience in the barbecue cleaning business. This lack of practical experience could negatively impact the franchisor's ability to provide effective training, support, and guidance to franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully evaluate the franchisor's training program and support infrastructure. Inquire about the qualifications and experience of the training staff and the resources available to franchisees.
    • Seek detailed information about the franchisor's operating procedures and systems. Assess the practicality and effectiveness of these systems in a real-world business environment.
    • Contact existing franchisees to discuss their experiences with the franchisor's training and support, and their assessment of the franchisor's operational expertise.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 1: "We do not conduct, and have never conducted, a business of the type described in this Franchise Disclosure Document."

    Franchisor Support Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Franchisor Financial Instability

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD discloses that the franchisor's stockholders' equity is negative, exceeding $(629,524) as of December 31, 2023. This indicates potential financial instability and raises concerns about the franchisor's ability to fulfill its obligations to franchisees, such as providing ongoing support and resources.
    • A financially unstable franchisor may struggle to invest in research and development, marketing, and other crucial areas that contribute to the success of the franchise system.
    • There is a risk that the franchisor may not be able to weather economic downturns or unexpected challenges, potentially leading to reduced support or even bankruptcy.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements and seek professional advice from a financial advisor to assess the franchisor's financial health and long-term viability.
    • Inquire about the franchisor's plans for achieving profitability and strengthening its financial position. Request updated financial information closer to the time of signing the franchise agreement.
    • Consider negotiating stronger contractual provisions that protect the franchisee in the event of franchisor financial distress.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8 and Item 17.h: "The franchisee will be required to make an estimated initial investment ranging from $78,200 to $833,700. This amount exceeds the franchisor’s stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2023, which is $(629,524)."

    Inadequate Training and Support for Designated Managers

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • While the FDD mentions a training program for Designated Managers, it lacks details about the program's content, duration, and effectiveness. Insufficient training could lead to poor management practices, operational inefficiencies, and ultimately, reduced profitability for the franchisee.
    • The FDD doesn't specify the level of ongoing support provided to Designated Managers after the initial training. A lack of continuous support and guidance could hinder their ability to adapt to changing market conditions and effectively manage the business.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request a detailed outline of the training program, including topics covered, training methods, and the qualifications of the trainers. Speak to existing franchisees about their experience with the training and support provided.
    • Inquire about the availability of ongoing support, such as mentoring programs, online resources, and regular communication with the franchisor's support team. Negotiate for specific support provisions in the franchise agreement.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "The Designated Manager must successfully complete our training program (See Item 11)."

    Dependence on Designated Manager without Ownership Stake

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD allows for a Designated Manager to run the day-to-day operations without requiring an ownership interest in the franchise. This creates a risk of misaligned incentives and potential conflicts of interest. A non-owner manager may not be as invested in the long-term success of the franchise as an owner-operator.
    • There's a higher risk of turnover with non-owner managers, leading to disruption and additional training costs for replacements.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully evaluate the qualifications and experience of any potential Designated Manager. Implement performance-based incentives and clear accountability measures to align their interests with the franchise's success.
    • Consider offering equity or profit-sharing opportunities to incentivize long-term commitment and performance.
    • Develop a robust succession plan to minimize disruption in case of manager turnover.

    FDD Citations:

    • General discussion of Designated Manager role and lack of ownership requirement in the provided FDD excerpt.

    Exit & Transfer Risks

    6 risks identified

    1
    3
    2

    Restrictive Contract Provisions Superseded by State Law

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Several provisions in the franchise agreement, such as those related to termination, renewal, arbitration location, releases of claims, statute of limitations, transfer fees, buy-back provisions, pricing, damages waivers, franchisor's business judgment, indemnification, attorneys' fees, non-competition, non-solicitation, questionnaires, and communication with regulators, may be superseded or modified by Washington state law.
    • This creates uncertainty about the enforceability of these provisions and could lead to disputes between the franchisor and franchisee.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchise agreement and related documents with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law to understand the interplay between the contract and state law.
    • Seek clarification from the franchisor on how they intend to apply these provisions in light of Washington law.
    • Be prepared to negotiate modifications to the agreement to ensure compliance with state law and protect your interests.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 2: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions...concerning your relationship with the franchisor..."
    • Item 3: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington..."
    • Item 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17: Specific references to RCW statutes and impact on contract provisions.

    Reliance on Franchise Brokers

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor uses franchise brokers, who represent the franchisor's interests, not the franchisee's.
    • Relying solely on information provided by a broker could lead to a skewed understanding of the franchise opportunity.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct independent research and due diligence, including speaking with current and former franchisees.
    • Verify information provided by the broker with the franchisor and other sources.
    • Consult with legal and financial advisors before making any decisions.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 18: "A franchise broker represents the franchisor and is paid a fee..."
    • Item 21: "Do not rely only on the information provided by a franchise broker..."

    Liquidated Damages as Penalty

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The liquidated damages provision in the Franchise Agreement, including brand fund contributions, may be deemed a penalty under Washington law if it's not reasonably related to actual damages.
    • This could make it difficult for the franchisor to enforce the liquidated damages clause.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Review the liquidated damages provision with legal counsel to assess its enforceability under Washington law.
    • Consider negotiating a more reasonable liquidated damages clause with the franchisor.
    • Understand the potential financial implications of breach of contract in light of this risk.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19: "A liquidated damages provision...may be construed as a penalty..."

    Indemnification Limitations

    Low

    Explanation:

    • The franchise agreement limits the franchisee's obligation to indemnify the franchisor for losses caused by the franchisor's negligence, willful misconduct, strict liability, or fraud.
    • While this is generally favorable to the franchisee, it's important to understand the specific scope of the limitation.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Review the indemnification clause with legal counsel to fully understand its implications.
    • Ensure the clause adequately protects you from liability for the franchisor's actions.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20: "Franchisees have no obligation to indemnify...for losses...caused solely and directly by the indemnified party’s negligence..."

    Initial Franchise Fee Deferral Conditions

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The initial franchise fee is deferred until the franchisor fulfills its pre-opening obligations and the franchise is open for business.
    • This creates a dependency on the franchisor's timely performance and could delay the start of operations if there are issues.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Clearly define the franchisor's pre-opening obligations in the franchise agreement.
    • Establish a timeline for completion of these obligations and consequences for delays.
    • Monitor the franchisor's progress closely and communicate any concerns promptly.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 22: "The initial franchise fees due will be deferred until the Franchisor has fulfilled its initial pre-opening obligations..."

    Conflict with Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states that the Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law supersedes any conflicting provisions in the Franchise Agreement.
    • This creates significant uncertainty for franchisees in Wisconsin, as the interplay between the contract and state law may be complex and require careful legal analysis.
    • This could lead to unexpected limitations on the franchisor's ability to terminate or not renew the agreement, potentially impacting the franchisee's exit strategy.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • If operating in Wisconsin, consult with legal counsel specializing in Wisconsin franchise law to understand the implications of the Fair Dealership Law.
    • Carefully review the franchise agreement and all related documents in light of the Fair Dealership Law.
    • Seek clarification from the franchisor on how they intend to comply with the Fair Dealership Law.

    FDD Citations:

    • Wisconsin Addendum: "The Wisconsin Fair Dealership Law...supersedes any provision of the Franchise Agreement if such provision is in conflict with that law."

    Operational & Brand Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Franchisor's Negative Stockholder's Equity

    High

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor's negative stockholder's equity of $(629,524) as of December 31, 2023, raises significant concerns about their financial stability. This indicates that the franchisor's liabilities exceed its assets, suggesting potential financial distress. This could impact their ability to provide ongoing support, invest in system improvements, and fulfill their obligations to franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements and inquire about their plans to address the negative equity. Seek professional financial advice to assess the implications of this financial position.
    • Request updated financial information closer to the time of investment to understand if the situation has improved.
    • Negotiate stronger guarantees or protections in the franchise agreement to mitigate the risk of franchisor default.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8, Special Risks to Consider: "Estimated Initial Investment. The franchisee will be required to make an estimated initial investment ranging from $78,200 to $833,700. This amount exceeds the franchisor’s stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2023, which is $(629,524)."

    Dependence on Designated Manager

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD mentions reliance on a Designated Manager for day-to-day operations, who may not have an ownership stake. This creates a risk of misaligned incentives and potential conflicts of interest. The Designated Manager's departure could disrupt operations and require costly retraining of a replacement.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully evaluate the Designated Manager's qualifications and experience. Consider incentivizing their performance through profit-sharing or equity options.
    • Develop a robust succession plan in case the Designated Manager leaves.
    • Ensure clear reporting lines and communication protocols between the franchisee, Designated Manager, and franchisor.

    FDD Citations:

    • Section describing Designated Manager requirements: "The Bar-B-Clean Franchise shall be managed by you...We do not currently require that the Designated Manager have an ownership interest..."

    Protection of Confidential Information

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • While the FDD mentions confidentiality agreements and System Protection Agreements, the effectiveness of these measures in preventing the misuse of confidential information is uncertain. Breaches of confidentiality by employees, contractors, or even the Designated Manager could harm the brand and competitive advantage.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly review the confidentiality agreements and System Protection Agreements. Consult with legal counsel to ensure they are robust and enforceable.
    • Implement strict data security protocols and access controls to limit access to sensitive information.
    • Conduct regular training for employees and contractors on the importance of confidentiality.

    FDD Citations:

    • Section referencing Exhibit H: "Any Designated Manager...must sign the 'System Protection Agreement'...All of your employees...must sign a confidentiality agreement..."

    Performance & ROI Risks

    3 risks identified

    2
    1

    Inflated Revenue Figures Due to Multi-Unit Representation

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 19 explicitly states that the figures presented, especially in Table 2, might be significantly higher than what a typical single-unit franchisee can expect. This is because the data aggregates revenue from multiple Bar-B-Clean Businesses operating under a single franchisee.
    • This aggregation creates a misleading impression of potential earnings, as a new franchisee starting with one unit is unlikely to achieve the same level of revenue shown in the table.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request a detailed breakdown of revenue figures for each individual Bar-B-Clean Business within the aggregated data. This will provide a more realistic picture of single-unit performance.
    • Contact existing franchisees, particularly those operating single units, to inquire about their actual revenue and expenses. This will offer valuable real-world insights.
    • Develop conservative financial projections based on the lowest performing single units within the disclosed data. This cautious approach will help manage expectations and prepare for potential challenges.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19, Table 2 and accompanying notes: "Because the figures in this Item 19 include data from the equivalent of multiple franchise B- Clean Businesses for a single outlet, these figures may include significantly higher Gross Revenue and corresponding numbers than the typical franchisee would generate operating a single Bar-B-Clean Business."

    Limited Operating History of Reporting Franchisees

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Table 2 only includes data from franchisees who opened within the first three months of 2024 and operated for 12 months. This limited timeframe doesn't reflect the long-term performance potential or challenges of the business.
    • Short-term data can be skewed by initial opening promotions, seasonal fluctuations, and other factors that might not be representative of sustained performance.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about the franchisor's rationale for selecting this specific timeframe and whether data from earlier franchisees is available.
    • Seek information on the performance of franchisees outside the reported period to gain a broader understanding of revenue trends.
    • Project future performance conservatively, considering the limited historical data and potential market fluctuations.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19, Table 2: "Table 2 shows the Gross Revenue for five Franchised Locations (“Table 2 Reporting Group”) that opened within the first three months of 2024 and were open for 12 months from March 30, 2024 to March 30, 2025."

    Lack of Net Income Data

    High

    Explanation:

    • The FDD provides gross revenue figures but doesn't disclose net income or profit. This makes it difficult to assess the true profitability of the franchise.
    • Without knowing the cost of sales, operating expenses, and other deductions, it's impossible to determine the actual earnings potential.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request a detailed breakdown of typical operating expenses, including cost of goods sold, marketing expenses, royalty fees, and other relevant costs.
    • Contact existing franchisees and inquire about their net income and profit margins. This will provide a more realistic understanding of potential earnings.
    • Develop comprehensive financial projections that incorporate estimated expenses based on industry benchmarks and information gathered from existing franchisees.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19, Table 2 Notes: "The financial performance representations in Table 2 do not reflect the costs of sales, operating expenses, or other costs or expenses that must be deducted from the gross revenue or gross sales figures to obtain your net income or profit."

    FDD Documents by Year

    Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents

    FDD Year: 2025

    Uploaded: 8/25/2025

    FDD Year: 2024

    Uploaded: 8/9/2025

    FDD Documents

    Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year

    Complete Franchise Analysis for Bar-B-Clean

    Due Diligence Analysis

    Comprehensive due diligence analysis and risk assessment for Bar-B-Clean franchise opportunities.

    Professional due diligence assessment covering 10 critical evaluation categories including financial performance analysis, market risk assessment, operational due diligence, legal compliance review, and franchise system evaluation.

    Investment Requirements and Financial Analysis

    Franchise Fee: $49,500

    Total Investment Range: $78,000 to $137,000

    Liquid Capital Required: $20,000

    Ongoing Royalty Fee: 6% of gross sales revenue

    Marketing Fund Contribution: 2% of gross sales

    Market Trends and Search Volume Analysis

    Comprehensive market analysis and search trend data for Bar-B-Clean franchise opportunities. This includes Google search volume trends, market interest indicators, seasonal patterns, and year-over-year growth analysis powered by authentic DataForSEO market research data.

    Franchise System Overview

    Total US Locations: 78 franchise and company-owned units

    Company Founded: 2012 - Established franchise system with proven business model

    Industry Sector: Home Services franchise opportunities