Angry Chickz logo

    Angry Chickz

    Food and Beverage
    Founded 201828 locations
    Company Profile
    Year Founded:2018

    Angry Chickz Franchise Cost

    Franchise Fee:$50,000Key Metric
    Total Investment:$603,000 - $1,320,000Key Metric
    Liquid Capital:$157,500
    Royalty Fee:6% of gross sales
    Marketing Fee:2% of gross sales
    Quick ROI Calculator
    Based on Angry Chickz's actual financial data
    Outlet Counts by Year
    Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
    Total US Locations:28

    Scale relative to 1,000 locations

    Franchised Units:1
    Corporate Units:27
    Additional Information

    Processing Franchise Details

    Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.

    Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.

    Search Interests & Trends

    Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis

    Search Interest & Trends

    No Trends Data Available

    Trend analysis data for Angry Chickz is being collected. Check back soon for insights.

    AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis

    Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.

    11
    High Risk
    Critical items
    31% of total
    21
    Medium Risk
    Monitor closely
    60% of total
    3
    Low Risk
    Manageable items
    9% of total
    35
    Total Items
    Factors analyzed
    10 categories
    6.14
    Overall Score
    Low RiskHigh Risk
    010

    Franchisor Stability Risks

    6 risks identified

    2
    3
    1

    Limited Operating History

    High

    Explanation:

    • Angry Chickz was founded in 2018 and the FDD is dated 2025, indicating an operating history of approximately 7 years. While not extremely new, this is still a relatively short track record compared to more established franchisors.
    • The FDD explicitly states "Because we have not been in business for three years, we are not able to include the three prior years of audited financial statements normally required by this Item 21." This lack of historical financial data makes it difficult to assess the franchisor's long-term financial stability and profitability.
    • The limited history makes it harder to predict future performance and assess the franchisor's ability to weather economic downturns or adapt to changing market conditions.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the available financial information, including the provided statements and any other available data.
    • Consult with a financial advisor to assess the franchisor's financial health and the potential risks associated with the investment.
    • Seek detailed projections and understand the underlying assumptions.
    • Speak with existing franchisees about their experiences and financial performance.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20: Tables provide limited historical data on unit growth and closures.
    • Item 21: Explicitly states the inability to provide three years of audited financials.

    Rapid Growth of Company-Owned Units

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 4 shows significant growth in company-owned units from 13 in 2022 to 27 in 2024. This rapid expansion could strain the franchisor's resources and potentially divert attention away from supporting franchisees.
    • Rapid growth can sometimes lead to operational inefficiencies and quality control issues if not managed properly.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about the franchisor's plans for managing this growth and ensuring adequate support for franchisees.
    • Ask about training programs and resources available to franchisees.
    • Assess the franchisor's infrastructure and support systems to determine if they are scalable to accommodate continued growth.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 4: Shows the growth of company-owned units from 2022-2024.

    Limited Franchisee Sales and Transfers

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 2 indicates zero franchisee transfers from 2022-2024. This lack of resale activity could signal a lack of demand for existing franchises.
    • Item 20, Table 3 shows only one franchised unit opened by the end of 2024. This limited franchise growth raises concerns about the attractiveness and viability of the franchise opportunity.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Investigate the reasons for the lack of resales and slow franchise growth. Inquire about any challenges faced by existing franchisees.
    • Speak with current franchisees about their satisfaction with the franchise system and their future plans.
    • Analyze market conditions and competition to assess the potential for future franchise growth.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 2: Shows zero franchise transfers.
    • Item 20, Table 3: Shows limited franchised unit openings.

    Potential for Conflicts of Interest

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 5 projects 6 new company-owned units in California in 2025, while projecting only 4 new franchised units across multiple states. This focus on company-owned expansion could create potential conflicts of interest with franchisees, particularly if company-owned units are located in close proximity to franchised locations.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchise agreement for any provisions addressing territorial protection and competition from company-owned units.
    • Inquire about the franchisor's strategy for balancing company-owned and franchised unit growth.
    • Discuss with existing franchisees their experiences with competition from company-owned units.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 5: Shows projected openings for company-owned and franchised units.

    Limited Franchisor Experience with Franchising

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 20, Table 1 shows that the first franchised unit opened in 2024. This indicates very limited experience in managing a franchise system.
    • The lack of franchise sales and transfers (Tables 2 and 3) further reinforces this lack of experience.
    • This inexperience could lead to inadequate support for franchisees and difficulties in navigating the complexities of franchise relationships.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly investigate the franchisor's management team and their experience in franchising.
    • Inquire about the training and support provided to franchisees.
    • Speak with existing franchisees about their experiences with the franchisor's support system.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 1: Shows the first franchised unit opened in 2024.
    • Item 20, Tables 2 & 3: Show limited franchise sales and transfers.

    Potential for Limited Communication with Former Franchisees

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Item 20 mentions confidentiality provisions that may restrict some current and former franchisees from discussing their experiences beyond the "Angry Chickz" system. While the FDD states there are no blanket restrictions, this could still limit the information available to prospective franchisees.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Attempt to contact as many current and former franchisees as possible, even if some are restricted in what they can discuss.
    • Focus questions on objective aspects of the business, such as financial performance, training, and support received.
    • Consult with a franchise attorney to understand the implications of any confidentiality provisions.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20: Discusses confidentiality clauses and communication with current and former franchisees.

    Disclosure & Representation Risks

    3 risks identified

    3

    No Guarantees of Success

    High

    Explanation:

    • Franchising involves inherent risks, and there's no guarantee of profitability or success.
    • The FDD likely contains disclaimers about earnings claims, and historical performance is not indicative of future results.
    • Market conditions, competition, and management effectiveness significantly impact a franchisee's success.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct thorough due diligence, including independent market research and financial analysis.
    • Consult with experienced franchise attorneys and financial advisors.
    • Develop a realistic business plan and budget, considering potential challenges and contingencies.

    FDD Citations:

    • While not explicitly stated in the provided excerpt, this is a standard risk disclosed in most FDDs, typically in Item 19 (Financial Performance Representations) or elsewhere in the document.

    Dependence on Franchisor's Brand and System

    High

    Explanation:

    • Franchisees are heavily reliant on the franchisor's brand reputation, operating system, and ongoing support.
    • Negative publicity or changes in the franchisor's business practices can directly impact the franchisee's business.
    • Franchisees have limited flexibility in making independent business decisions.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully evaluate the franchisor's track record, financial stability, and brand strength.
    • Review the franchise agreement thoroughly to understand the level of control the franchisor exerts.
    • Communicate with existing franchisees to assess their satisfaction and experiences with the franchisor.

    FDD Citations:

    • This risk is generally implied throughout the FDD, particularly in sections related to brand standards, operating procedures, and the franchisor's rights and obligations.

    Significant Capital Investment

    High

    Explanation:

    • The investment range of $603,000 - $1,320,000 represents a substantial financial commitment.
    • Franchisees must carefully assess their financial resources and ability to secure financing.
    • Unexpected costs and delays can strain the franchisee's finances and jeopardize the business.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Develop a detailed financial plan, including contingency funds for unforeseen expenses.
    • Explore various financing options and secure pre-approval for loans.
    • Consult with financial advisors to assess the investment's viability and potential return on investment.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 7 of the FDD provides details on the estimated initial investment.

    Financial & Fee Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Franchisor Financial Instability (Maryland Financial Assurance)

    High

    Explanation:

    • The Maryland Securities Commissioner requiring a financial assurance suggests potential financial instability of the franchisor. This means the franchisor may not have sufficient capital to meet its obligations, which could significantly impact its ability to support franchisees.
    • Deferring initial fees and payments until pre-opening obligations are met could indicate a cash flow problem for the franchisor, further raising concerns about their financial health.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the franchisor's audited financial statements and discuss their financial health with a financial advisor.
    • Seek legal counsel to understand the implications of the financial assurance and deferred payments.
    • Consider the potential impact of the franchisor's financial situation on your franchise's success.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 5, Additional Disclosure: "Based upon the franchisor's financial condition, the Maryland Securities Commissioner has required a financial assurance."
    • Item 5, Additional Disclosure: "Therefore, all initial fees and payments owed by franchisees shall be deferred until the franchisor completes its pre-opening obligations under the franchise agreement."

    Variability in Initial Investment

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The wide range in estimated initial investment ($603,000 - $1,323,000) presents a significant risk. Unexpected costs exceeding the low-end estimate could strain your finances and jeopardize the launch of your franchise.
    • The FDD provides a broad range for several categories, such as Construction and Leasehold Improvements ($240,000 - $500,000) and Additional Funds ($20,000 - $55,000), making accurate budgeting challenging.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct thorough due diligence to understand the factors contributing to the wide range. Research local real estate costs, construction expenses, and supplier pricing.
    • Develop a detailed budget based on the high-end estimate to prepare for potential cost overruns.
    • Secure financing that can accommodate the higher end of the investment range.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 7: "Total $603,000 - $1,323,000 (exclusive of land costs)"
    • Item 7: Individual line items within the Estimated Initial Investment table.

    Non-Refundable Initial Franchise Fee

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The $50,000 initial franchise fee is non-refundable, representing a significant financial risk if the franchise relationship terminates prematurely or the business fails.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly evaluate the franchise opportunity and conduct extensive due diligence before signing the franchise agreement.
    • Seek legal counsel to review the franchise agreement and understand the implications of the non-refundable fee.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 7: "Initial Franchise Fee: $50,000"
    • Item 7: "Note: Actual costs will vary for each franchisee and each location depending on a number of factors. Payments to us are not refundable."

    Legal & Contract Risks

    3 risks identified

    2
    1

    Superseding State Law

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) may override provisions in the Development Agreement, particularly regarding termination and renewal. This creates uncertainty about the enforceability of certain contract terms.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the Development Agreement with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law to ensure compliance with FIPA and identify potential conflicts.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to amend any provisions that conflict with FIPA or pose significant risks.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 3: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the Development Agreement...concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise."

    Mandatory Washington Jurisdiction

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Disputes related to the franchise agreement may be subject to mandatory arbitration, mediation, or litigation in Washington State, regardless of the franchisee's location. This could increase travel and legal costs for franchisees outside of Washington.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Factor potential travel and legal costs associated with Washington jurisdiction into the overall investment assessment.
    • Consult with legal counsel to understand the implications of mandatory jurisdiction and potential strategies for dispute resolution.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 4: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington..."

    Invalidity of Certain Releases and Waivers

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states that certain releases or waivers of rights under the Washington FIPA are void, except in specific circumstances involving negotiated settlements with independent counsel. This limits the franchisor's ability to enforce waivers that are not compliant with state law.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Review all agreements carefully with legal counsel to identify any potentially invalid releases or waivers.
    • Avoid signing any releases or waivers without consulting with independent legal counsel.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 5: "A release or waiver of rights...purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act...is void..."

    Territory & Competition Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Competition from Other Franchisees

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD explicitly states that franchisees will not receive an exclusive territory and may face competition from other franchisees.
    • This means that other Angry Chickz restaurants could open relatively close to your location, potentially impacting your customer base and revenue.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully evaluate the proposed Protected Area and surrounding areas for potential future franchise locations.
    • Discuss with the franchisor their development plans for the surrounding area to understand the potential for future competition.
    • Focus on building a strong local customer base and brand loyalty through excellent service and marketing efforts.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "You will not receive an exclusive territory. You may face competition from other franchisees..."

    Competition from Corporately-Owned Outlets and Other Channels

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states that franchisees may face competition from outlets owned by the franchisor and other distribution channels or competitive brands they control.
    • This could include company-owned stores, online ordering platforms, or other restaurant concepts owned by Angry Chickz.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Inquire about the franchisor's plans for corporate-owned locations and other channels in your area.
    • Negotiate for specific protections in your franchise agreement regarding competition from corporate-owned outlets.
    • Differentiate your franchise through local marketing and community engagement.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "You may face competition from…outlets that we own, or from other channels of distribution or competitive brands that we control."

    Limited Protected Area and Encroachment from Non-Traditional Venues

    High

    Explanation:

    • The Protected Area, while typically a 3-mile radius, can be smaller in densely populated areas or even limited to the restaurant location itself.
    • Furthermore, the franchisor reserves the right to open Non-Traditional Venues (e.g., ghost kitchens, stadiums, airports) within the Protected Area, which could directly compete with the franchisee.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly analyze the demographics and competitive landscape of the proposed Protected Area.
    • Negotiate for a larger Protected Area or specific restrictions on Non-Traditional Venues within the Protected Area.
    • Adapt your business model to cater to different customer segments or offer unique products/services not available at Non-Traditional Venues.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 12: "In densely populated areas…your Protected Area may be smaller…or limited to the location of your Restaurant…except for Restaurants located at Non-Traditional Venues…"

    Regulatory & Compliance Risks

    3 risks identified

    1
    2

    Founder's Previous Bankruptcy

    High

    Explanation:

    • The CEO and founder's previous Chapter 7 bankruptcy raises concerns about their financial stability and decision-making. While the bankruptcy was discharged, it could indicate a history of financial difficulties that could potentially impact the franchisor's long-term viability and support provided to franchisees.
    • This past financial instability could affect the franchisor's ability to secure financing, invest in research and development, or weather economic downturns, potentially impacting franchisee success.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly investigate the circumstances surrounding the bankruptcy, including the reasons for filing and the extent of the financial difficulties. Seek legal counsel to review the bankruptcy filings and assess potential implications.
    • Assess the franchisor's current financial health and stability by reviewing Item 20 (Financial Performance Representations, if available) and Item 21 (Financial Statements). Compare their current financial performance to industry benchmarks.
    • Inquire about the franchisor's current financial management practices and safeguards implemented to prevent future financial distress.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 4: "David Mkhitaryan, our Chief Executive Officer and founder, filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy..."

    Lack of Clarity on Remodeling Requirements

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 8 mentions "Maintenance, appearance, and remodeling requirements" but lacks specific details about the frequency, scope, and costs associated with these obligations. This ambiguity creates uncertainty for potential franchisees regarding future capital expenditures and potential disruptions to business operations.
    • Unclear remodeling requirements can lead to disputes between the franchisor and franchisees regarding the necessity and cost of renovations, potentially impacting the franchisee's profitability and relationship with the franchisor.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request a copy of the Franchise Agreement (Item A) and carefully review Section 5.5 to understand the specific requirements for maintenance, appearance, and remodeling. Seek clarification from the franchisor on any ambiguous language.
    • Inquire about the typical costs associated with meeting these requirements, including estimated expenses for routine maintenance, periodic updates, and major renovations. Request examples of past remodeling projects and their associated costs.
    • Consult with existing franchisees to understand their experiences with maintenance and remodeling requirements, including the frequency, cost, and impact on business operations.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8: "Maintenance, appearance, and remodeling requirements"
    • Item 8: "Section 5.5 of Franchise Agreement"

    Limited Operational History

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Angry Chickz was founded in 2018, indicating a relatively short operational history. This limited track record presents a higher risk compared to more established franchises, as there is less data available to assess the long-term viability and success of the business model.
    • A shorter operational history may mean the franchisor has less experience supporting franchisees, navigating market challenges, and adapting to changing consumer preferences.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review Item 20 (Financial Performance Representations, if available) to assess the financial performance of existing franchisees. However, be aware that limited historical data may not be fully representative of future performance.
    • Speak with a significant number of existing franchisees to understand their experiences with the franchisor, including the level of support provided, the effectiveness of the marketing programs, and the overall profitability of their businesses.
    • Conduct thorough market research to assess the demand for the Angry Chickz concept in your target market and the competitive landscape. Consider the potential for market saturation and the long-term growth prospects for the brand.

    FDD Citations:

    • Cover Page: "Founded: 2018"

    Franchisor Support Risks

    3 risks identified

    3

    Limited Site Selection Assistance

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The franchisor only provides limited assistance with site selection, placing the onus on the franchisee to find a suitable location. This can be challenging and time-consuming, especially for those new to the industry.
    • While the FDD mentions factors considered for site approval, the franchisor's subjective evaluation criteria and the potential for rejection after significant investment in due diligence create uncertainty.
    • The franchisor's lack of ownership or leasing of premises adds complexity to the process, requiring franchisees to negotiate independently with third-party landlords.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Engage an experienced real estate broker specializing in restaurant locations to assist with site identification and lease negotiations.
    • Thoroughly research demographics, competition, and local regulations before submitting a site for approval.
    • Request clear, written guidelines from the franchisor regarding site selection criteria and the approval process.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "We do not locate sites for you. However, we may, without obligation, assist you in locating or evaluating a site."
    • Item 11: "Your Restaurant location will be purchased or leased by you from independent third parties."

    Limited Pre-Opening Assistance

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The FDD states, "Except as listed below, we are not required to provide you with any assistance." This suggests limited support beyond the specified areas, potentially leaving franchisees to navigate critical pre-opening tasks independently.
    • While the franchisor provides design specifications, they do not provide equipment, signs, fixtures, or opening inventory, increasing the burden on the franchisee to source and manage these crucial elements.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Develop a comprehensive pre-opening checklist that includes all necessary tasks and timelines.
    • Research and secure reliable vendors for equipment, supplies, and other necessary items in advance.
    • Consult with experienced restaurant operators or industry professionals for guidance on pre-opening preparations.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "Except as listed below, we are not required to provide you with any assistance."
    • Item 11: "We do not provide equipment, signs, fixtures, opening inventory or supplies, but provide you with specifications only."

    Limited Post-Opening Support

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Ongoing support after the initial opening period appears limited. While the franchisor offers additional assistance upon request, it is at the franchisee's expense, potentially creating a barrier to seeking help.
    • The frequency and quality of ongoing training, updates, and operational guidance are not clearly defined, raising concerns about consistent support and adaptation to market changes.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Clarify with the franchisor the specific types of ongoing support offered, including frequency, costs, and response times.
    • Establish a network of fellow franchisees for peer support and best practice sharing.
    • Budget for potential ongoing support costs to ensure access to assistance when needed.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "upon reasonable request, we will give you additional assistance and advice… If provided at your request, you must reimburse our expenses and pay our then-current training charges and Travel Expenses."
    • Item 11: "provide training courses, programs and conventions that we choose to provide."

    Exit & Transfer Risks

    5 risks identified

    1
    3
    1

    Restrictive Transfer Provisions Conflicting with State Law

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 3 indicates that Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) may supersede the Development Agreement regarding termination and renewal, potentially impacting transfer rights.
    • Item 5 voids any release or waiver in the Development Agreement that contradicts FIPA, especially concerning renewals or transfers, unless specific conditions are met.
    • Item 7 limits transfer fees to reasonable costs, potentially conflicting with franchisor's desired profitability from transfers.
    • These combined provisions create significant uncertainty and potential legal challenges regarding the franchisee's ability to transfer the franchise, which is a crucial aspect of exit strategy.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the Development Agreement with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law to ensure alignment with FIPA regarding transfer provisions.
    • Negotiate clear and favorable transfer terms within the Development Agreement that comply with FIPA's limitations on releases, waivers, and fees.
    • Seek written clarification from the franchisor regarding their interpretation and application of these provisions in practice.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 3: "RCW 19.100.180 may supersede provisions in the Development Agreement... concerning your relationship with the franchisor, including in the areas of termination and renewal of your franchise."
    • Item 5: "A release or waiver of rights... purporting to bind the franchisee to waive compliance with any provision under the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act... is void except when executed pursuant to a negotiated settlement..."
    • Item 7: "Transfer fees are collectable only to the extent that they reflect the franchisor’s reasonable estimated or actual costs in effecting a transfer."

    Limited Termination Rights

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 8 states that termination by the franchisee is allowed only under grounds permitted by state law. This can be restrictive and may not offer sufficient flexibility for the franchisee to exit if the business underperforms or personal circumstances change.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Thoroughly research Washington state law regarding franchisee termination rights to understand the specific grounds permitted.
    • Negotiate with the franchisor to include specific, reasonable termination clauses in the Development Agreement that provide more flexibility beyond the minimum required by state law.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 8: "The franchisee may terminate the Development Agreement under any grounds permitted under state law."

    Potential for Unfair Buy-Back Provisions

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Item 9 highlights the illegality of buy-back provisions without franchisee consent unless termination is for good cause, as per RCW 19.100.180(2)(j). This suggests a potential risk of the franchisor attempting to include such provisions, which could negatively impact the franchisee's exit options.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the Development Agreement for any buy-back clauses and ensure they comply with RCW 19.100.180(2)(j), requiring franchisee consent or termination for good cause.
    • Consult with legal counsel specializing in Washington franchise law to confirm the legality and fairness of any buy-back provisions.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 9: "Provisions... that permit the franchisor to repurchase the franchisee’s business for any reason during the term of the Development Agreement without the franchisee’s consent are unlawful... unless the franchise is terminated for good cause."

    Risk of Non-Compliance with Non-Compete/Solicitation Laws

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Items 15 and 16 outline specific limitations on non-competition and non-solicitation agreements under Washington law. Any conflicting provisions in the Development Agreement are void. This presents a risk if the franchisor attempts to enforce overly broad restrictions upon exit, limiting future business opportunities for the franchisee.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review the Development Agreement with legal counsel to ensure non-compete and non-solicitation clauses comply with RCW 49.62.020, 49.62.030, and 49.62.060.
    • Negotiate reasonable and legally compliant restrictions that protect the franchisor's legitimate interests without unduly hindering the franchisee's future prospects.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 15: "Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable against an employee... unless the employee’s earnings... exceed $100,000 per year..."
    • Item 16: "RCW 49.62.060 prohibits a franchisor from restricting... a franchisee from (i) soliciting or hiring any employee of a franchisee of the same franchisor or (ii) soliciting or hiring any employee of the franchisor."

    Uncertainty Regarding Dispute Resolution Venue

    Low

    Explanation:

    • Item 4 specifies that the arbitration or mediation site for disputes related to franchises purchased in Washington will be in Washington or a mutually agreed upon location. While this provides some clarity, the potential for disputes to be held outside of Washington introduces a degree of uncertainty and potential additional costs for the franchisee in exit-related disputes.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Negotiate within the Development Agreement for a specific and preferred dispute resolution venue within Washington state to minimize travel and associated costs.
    • Consult with legal counsel to understand the implications of different dispute resolution venues and develop a strategy for potential disputes.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 4: "In any arbitration or mediation involving a franchise purchased in Washington, the arbitration or mediation site will be either in the state of Washington, or in a place mutually agreed upon..."

    Operational & Brand Risks

    3 risks identified

    3

    Limited Site Selection Support

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Franchisor only reviews proposed sites and doesn't actively assist in finding them (Item 11). This puts the onus on the franchisee to identify suitable locations, which can be time-consuming and challenging, especially for those new to the area or the industry.
    • Rejection of a proposed site after lease signing can lead to financial losses.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct thorough independent market research and site analysis before submitting potential locations to the franchisor.
    • Consult with local real estate experts familiar with restaurant businesses.
    • Negotiate lease agreements with contingencies based on franchisor approval.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "We do not locate sites for you. However, we may, without obligation, assist you in locating or evaluating a site."
    • Item 11: "You may not enter into a lease or purchase agreement for a site unless and until the site has been accepted."

    Dependence on Franchisor's Site Approval

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • Franchisor has absolute discretion in approving or rejecting proposed sites (Item 11). This creates a dependency on the franchisor's judgment and potentially exposes franchisees to delays or rejection based on criteria that may not be fully transparent.
    • Limited insight into the franchisor's site selection criteria can make planning difficult.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Request clear and detailed site selection criteria from the franchisor upfront.
    • Engage in open communication with the franchisor during the site selection process to understand their rationale and address potential concerns proactively.
    • Seek legal counsel to review the franchise agreement and ensure it provides reasonable protections regarding site approval.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "Upon receiving the information regarding a proposed site, we will review the information and either accept or reject the proposed site under our then-current standards for site acceptance and rejection."

    Limited Post-Opening Support

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • While initial training and grand opening support are provided, ongoing operational support is limited and may come at an additional cost (Item 11). This can be challenging for franchisees, especially during the critical post-opening phase when they may need more guidance and assistance.
    • Additional fees for support can strain the franchisee's budget.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Clarify the scope and cost of ongoing support services with the franchisor before signing the franchise agreement.
    • Develop a strong internal operational plan and build a capable team to minimize reliance on franchisor support.
    • Network with other franchisees to share best practices and support each other.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 11: "upon reasonable request, we will give you additional assistance and advice… you must reimburse our expenses and pay our then-current training charges and Travel Expenses."

    Performance & ROI Risks

    3 risks identified

    2
    1

    Lack of Financial Performance Representations

    High

    Explanation:

    • Item 19 explicitly states that no financial performance representations are provided. This makes it difficult to project potential revenue, expenses, and profitability, increasing the risk of financial underperformance.
    • Without a benchmark, it's challenging to assess the feasibility of the business model and the likelihood of achieving a desirable return on investment.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Conduct thorough independent market research in your target area to estimate potential demand and revenue.
    • Develop a detailed financial model with conservative assumptions about sales, costs, and expenses.
    • Consult with experienced restaurant operators and financial advisors to assess the reasonableness of your projections.
    • Interview existing franchisees to gather information about their financial performance, while acknowledging the limitations mentioned in Item 19 regarding confidentiality clauses.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 19: "The earnings claims figure does not reflect the costs of sales, operating expenses, or other costs or expenses that must be deducted from the gross revenue or gross sales figures to obtain your net income or profit."

    Limited Operating History of the Franchise System

    High

    Explanation:

    • Angry Chickz was founded in 2018 and as of 2024, has only one franchised unit. This limited operating history increases the risk of unforeseen challenges and uncertainties associated with a relatively new franchise system.
    • The lack of a substantial track record makes it difficult to assess the long-term viability and profitability of the franchise model.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully evaluate the franchisor's business plan and management team's experience.
    • Seek legal and financial advice from experienced professionals specializing in franchising.
    • Thoroughly research the competitive landscape and the brand's market positioning.
    • Engage in extensive due diligence, including conversations with existing franchisees, to understand the challenges and opportunities of the business.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 20, Table 1: Shows limited number of franchise units and overall system growth.
    • Item 20, Table 3: Confirms only one franchised unit opened by the end of 2024.

    Wide Range in Initial Investment

    Medium

    Explanation:

    • The significant range in the estimated initial investment ($603,000 - $1,323,000) presents a risk of unexpected costs and potential financial strain.
    • The broad range makes it difficult to accurately budget and secure financing, potentially leading to cost overruns and impacting profitability.

    Potential Mitigations:

    • Carefully review all components of the estimated initial investment and understand the factors contributing to the wide range.
    • Obtain detailed quotes from multiple vendors for all major expenses, such as construction, equipment, and inventory.
    • Develop a realistic budget that considers potential cost overruns and contingencies.
    • Secure financing with sufficient buffer to accommodate unexpected expenses.

    FDD Citations:

    • Item 7: "Total (exclusive of land costs) $603,000 - $1,323,000"

    FDD Documents by Year

    Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents

    FDD Year: 2025

    Uploaded: 8/8/2025

    FDD Year: 2024

    Uploaded: 8/25/2025

    FDD Documents

    Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year

    Complete Franchise Analysis for Angry Chickz

    Due Diligence Analysis

    Comprehensive due diligence analysis and risk assessment for Angry Chickz franchise opportunities.

    Professional due diligence assessment covering 10 critical evaluation categories including financial performance analysis, market risk assessment, operational due diligence, legal compliance review, and franchise system evaluation.

    Investment Requirements and Financial Analysis

    Franchise Fee: $50,000

    Total Investment Range: $603,000 to $1,320,000

    Liquid Capital Required: $157,500

    Ongoing Royalty Fee: 6% of gross sales revenue

    Marketing Fund Contribution: 2% of gross sales

    Market Trends and Search Volume Analysis

    Comprehensive market analysis and search trend data for Angry Chickz franchise opportunities. This includes Google search volume trends, market interest indicators, seasonal patterns, and year-over-year growth analysis powered by authentic DataForSEO market research data.

    Franchise System Overview

    Total US Locations: 28 franchise and company-owned units

    Company Founded: 2018 - Established franchise system with proven business model

    Industry Sector: Food and Beverage franchise opportunities