1-800 Water Damage
Home Services
Founded 2015175 locationsCompany Profile
Year Founded:2015
1-800 Water Damage Franchise Cost
| Franchise Fee: | $59,000Key Metric |
| Total Investment: | $221,000 - $315,000Key Metric |
| Liquid Capital: | $50,000 |
| Royalty Fee: | 8% of gross sales |
| Marketing Fee: | 2% of gross sales |
Quick ROI Calculator
Based on 1-800 Water Damage's actual financial data
Outlet Counts by Year
Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
Total US Locations:175
Scale relative to 1,000 locations
Franchised Units:175
Additional Information
Processing Franchise Details
Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.
Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.
Search Interests & Trends
Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis
Search Interest & Trends
No Trends Data Available
Trend analysis data for 1-800 Water Damage is being collected. Check back soon for insights.
AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis
Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.
18
High Risk
Critical items
46% of total
18
Medium Risk
Monitor closely
46% of total
3
Low Risk
Manageable items
8% of total
39
Total Items
Factors analyzed
10 categories
6.92
Overall Score
Low RiskHigh Risk
010
Franchisor Stability Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Limited Operating History
Medium
Explanation:
- 1-800 Water Damage was founded in 2015, giving it a relatively short operating history in the franchising world. This limited track record makes it harder to assess the long-term viability and stability of the franchise system, its business model, and its support infrastructure.
- A shorter history means less data is available to evaluate the franchisor's performance through various economic cycles and market conditions. This can make it difficult to predict future success and stability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the franchisor's management team and their experience in the industry. Look for evidence of successful business ventures and a strong understanding of the home services market.
- Speak with existing franchisees to gauge their satisfaction with the franchise system, the level of support provided, and their overall financial performance. This can provide valuable insights into the franchisor's track record and potential for future success.
- Carefully analyze the FDD, particularly Item 20, for any disclosures regarding litigation, bankruptcy, or other financial difficulties. This can help assess the franchisor's financial stability and risk of future problems.
FDD Citations:
- General information throughout the FDD points to the relatively recent establishment of the franchise system.
Dependence on Related Parties
High
Explanation:
- The FDD discloses significant financial interdependencies with related parties, including Belfor USA Group, Inc. and Belfor Holdings, Inc. The company has accounts receivable from related parties, guarantees loans for them, and relies on them for working capital. This creates a significant risk for franchisees if the financial health of these related entities deteriorates.
- The guarantee of performance listed in the FDD exposes the company to potential liabilities related to other franchises within the Belfor Franchise Group. While the company may seek to recover amounts paid under this guarantee, the lack of specific recourse or collateral rights increases the risk of non-recovery.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the financial statements of the franchisor and related entities to assess their financial health and stability. Consult with a financial advisor to understand the implications of the related party transactions.
- Inquire about the nature and extent of the related party transactions and the potential impact on the franchise system. Seek clarification on the guarantees and the likelihood of the franchisor being called upon to fulfill them.
- Consider the potential consequences of a default by the related parties on the franchisor's financial stability and ability to support its franchisees.
FDD Citations:
- Item 14: Related Party Transactions - Details the financial interdependencies and guarantees.
Concentrated Geographic Presence
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 20 lists a limited number of states where the franchise is registered or where filings are pending. This suggests a concentrated geographic presence, which can make the franchisor more vulnerable to regional economic downturns or localized market fluctuations.
- Limited geographic diversification can also hinder the franchisor's overall growth potential and limit opportunities for franchisees to expand into new markets.
Potential Mitigations:
- Research the economic conditions and market trends in the states where the franchise operates. Assess the potential impact of regional economic downturns or local market fluctuations on the franchise business.
- Inquire about the franchisor's plans for future expansion and the potential for franchisees to operate in new markets. Consider the long-term growth potential of the franchise system.
- Evaluate the competition in the existing markets and the potential for market saturation. Assess the likelihood of success in a concentrated market.
FDD Citations:
- Item 20: List of states where franchise registrations are effective, pending, or relying on exceptions.
Disclosure & Representation Risks
3 risks identified
3
Misrepresentation of Franchisor Capabilities
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that 1-800 Water Damage has "established a system of marketing, promoting, advertising, managing, conducting and operating businesses" and that their marks "have gained and continue to gain public acceptance and goodwill." This is a broad claim, especially given the relatively young age of the franchisor (founded 2015). There's a risk that these claims are exaggerated or not fully substantiated.
Potential Mitigations:
- Independently verify the franchisor's claims by speaking with existing franchisees, researching market share data, and reviewing marketing materials. Focus on validating the effectiveness of their marketing system and the actual brand recognition of "1-800 Water Damage."
- Request specific data points on customer acquisition costs, lead generation volume, and franchisee profitability to assess the true strength of the system.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1, Section A: "Through the expenditure of considerable time and effort, we have established a system..."
Limited Track Record/Financial Stability of Franchisor
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor was founded in 2015. This relatively short operating history presents a risk as there is less established performance data to assess the long-term viability and success of the franchise model.
- Limited financial history increases the difficulty in evaluating the franchisor's financial stability and ability to provide ongoing support to franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review the franchisor's financial statements (Item 21) and discuss their financial performance with a financial advisor. Pay close attention to trends, liabilities, and any potential red flags.
- Inquire about the franchisor's long-term business plan and strategies for navigating economic downturns or industry changes.
- Seek legal counsel to review the FDD and Franchise Agreement for protections in case of franchisor insolvency.
FDD Citations:
- General FDD Context: Franchisor founded in 2015.
- Item 21: Franchisor's Financial Statements (analyze for stability and trends).
Restrictions on Reconstruction Services
High
Explanation:
- Franchisees are restricted from offering Reconstruction Services unless they meet specific requirements, including obtaining a general contractor's license, passing ICC examinations, obtaining franchisor permission, and completing specific training. This limits the potential revenue streams for franchisees, especially in situations where customers require both remediation and reconstruction services.
- The mandatory referral to the franchisor or BELFOR for reconstruction services creates a potential conflict of interest and may limit the franchisee's ability to fully serve their customers.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully evaluate the cost and effort required to meet the Reconstruction Standards and assess the potential return on investment.
- Negotiate with the franchisor to clarify the referral process for Reconstruction Services and seek greater flexibility in serving customer needs.
- Consider the competitive landscape and whether the restriction on Reconstruction Services will put the franchisee at a disadvantage.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1, Section A: "The Business may not provide...Reconstruction Services unless Franchisee has..."
Financial & Fee Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Uncertain Royalty or Advertising Fund Requirements
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD doesn't explicitly state the ongoing royalty or advertising fund contributions, making it difficult to project future expenses and profitability.
- Without knowing these fees, it's impossible to accurately assess the long-term financial viability of the franchise.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request clarification from the franchisor regarding royalty and advertising fees. Obtain these figures in writing.
- Consult with a franchise attorney to review the franchise agreement and ensure these fees are clearly defined and reasonable.
- Develop financial projections with varying royalty and advertising fee assumptions to understand the potential impact on profitability.
FDD Citations:
- Item 6 and 7 lack explicit mention of royalty and advertising fees.
Wide Range of Initial Investment
Medium
Explanation:
- The substantial difference between the low ($220,803) and high ($315,448) end of the estimated initial investment for a standard franchise creates uncertainty.
- This wide range makes it difficult to accurately budget and secure financing, potentially leading to unexpected costs.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review Item 7 notes to understand the factors contributing to the investment range.
- Obtain detailed breakdowns of each cost category from the franchisor for both the low and high ends of the range.
- Develop a detailed budget based on the high end of the range to account for potential cost overruns.
FDD Citations:
- Item 7: "TOTAL ESTIMATED INITIAL INVESTMENT & ADDITIONAL EXPENSES $220,803 - $315,448"
Reliance on Unaudited Franchisee-Reported Data
High
Explanation:
- Item 19 relies on unaudited gross sales data reported by franchisees, which may not accurately reflect the financial performance of the franchise system.
- This lack of independent verification raises concerns about the reliability of the presented financial information.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a financial advisor to analyze the presented data and identify any potential red flags.
- Speak with existing franchisees to gain a better understanding of their actual financial performance.
- Compare the presented data with industry benchmarks to assess its reasonableness.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "The sales information presented in this Item was provided by the Reported Franchisees through monthly Gross Sales reports submitted by them. We have not audited the data."
Legal & Contract Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Enforceability of Termination Provisions in Virginia
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD states that termination provisions in the franchise agreement may not be enforceable under Virginia law if they don't constitute "reasonable cause." This creates uncertainty for franchisees operating in Virginia regarding the circumstances under which the franchisor can terminate the agreement.
- The definition of "reasonable cause" can be subject to interpretation and legal disputes, potentially leading to costly litigation.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the termination provisions in the franchise agreement with legal counsel specializing in Virginia franchise law.
- Seek clarification from the franchisor regarding their interpretation of "reasonable cause" and how it applies to specific scenarios.
- Negotiate with the franchisor to include more specific and objective criteria for termination in the agreement.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17.h: "Pursuant to Section 13.1-564 of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, it is unlawful for a franchisor to cancel a franchise without reasonable cause."
Waiver of Claims and Reliance Restrictions
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that franchisees cannot waive claims under state franchise laws, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on statements made by the franchisor. While this appears to protect franchisees, it also highlights the potential for disputes related to misrepresentations or omissions by the franchisor.
- This provision could lead to legal challenges if the franchisor attempts to enforce waivers or disclaimers in other parts of the agreement.
Potential Mitigations:
- Conduct thorough due diligence to verify the accuracy of all information provided by the franchisor.
- Consult with an experienced franchise attorney to review the entire franchise agreement and ensure that no provisions contradict the non-waiver clause.
- Document all communications and representations made by the franchisor.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17.h: "No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment...shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor..."
Limited Operating History
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor was founded in 2015, indicating a relatively short operating history. This presents a risk as there is less established track record to assess the long-term viability and success of the franchise system.
- Limited historical data makes it harder to project future performance and assess the franchisor's experience in managing a franchise network.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the franchisor's background, management team, and business model.
- Speak with existing franchisees to understand their experiences and assess the franchisor's support and training programs.
- Carefully analyze the financial performance representations (Item 19) and understand the assumptions underlying the projections.
FDD Citations:
- FDD Cover Page: "Founded: 2015"
Territory & Competition Risks
3 risks identified
3
Non-Exclusive Territory & Competition from Within the System
High
Explanation:
- The FDD explicitly states that territories are non-exclusive (Item 12.1). This means other 1-800 Water Damage franchisees, company-owned outlets, and even other brands controlled by the franchisor can operate and compete directly within your designated territory.
- This significantly increases competition and can impact your market share and revenue potential, especially given the emphasis on referrals and lead generation through the call center and TPAs, which can be redirected if you're not compliant or performing adequately.
- Competition from within the system can create price wars and erode profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the existing presence of 1-800 Water Damage businesses and related brands in and around your prospective territory. Understand their market share and competitive strategies.
- Develop a strong local marketing plan to differentiate yourself and build a loyal customer base. Focus on building relationships with insurance agents, property managers, and other referral sources.
- Maintain meticulous compliance with the franchise agreement and performance standards to avoid having leads redirected to competitors.
- Excel in customer service and build a strong reputation to gain a competitive edge.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12.1: "You will not receive an exclusive Territory. You may face competition from other franchisees, from outlets that we own, or from other channels of distribution or competitive brands that we control."
- Item 12.2: "There are no Territory protections related to providing services to customers located within your Territory."
Competition from Existing Franchise Agreements with Stronger Protections
High
Explanation:
- The FDD acknowledges that some existing franchisees operate under older agreements with stronger territorial protections (Item 12.2). This could restrict your ability to service customers in certain areas, even if they are within your designated territory.
- This creates an uneven playing field and could limit your growth potential, particularly if these protected territories are within your primary service area.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the FDD and request clarification from the franchisor regarding the number and location of territories with these legacy protections. Assess the potential impact on your business operations.
- Negotiate with the franchisor to ensure you have a reasonable opportunity to operate within your designated territory, even if it overlaps with these older agreements.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12.2: "You may be restricted from servicing customers and working in certain 1-800 WATER DAMAGE Territories if the existing franchisee or Managing Operator operating in that Territory is under a version of franchise agreement that prohibits other System franchisees...from advertising or providing Services in their Territory..."
Minimum Gross Sales Requirements
High
Explanation:
- The FDD outlines escalating Minimum Gross Sales Requirements (Item 12.3). Failure to meet these requirements can lead to termination of the franchise agreement, the establishment of another franchise in your territory, or allowing other franchisees to operate within your area.
- These requirements create significant pressure to perform and could lead to financial strain if sales targets are not met.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop a realistic business plan with conservative sales projections. Consider the market size, competition, and your marketing budget.
- Seek advice from existing franchisees about their sales performance and strategies.
- Negotiate achievable Minimum Gross Sales Requirements with the franchisor, especially during the initial years of operation.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12.3: "If the Business fails to achieve the required Minimum Gross Sales Requirement during any consecutive three month period, we reserve the right to terminate the Agreement..."
Regulatory & Compliance Risks
5 risks identified
1
3
1
Inconsistent Discount Application for Related Franchisees
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 5.4 states Related Franchisees receive a 25% discount on the Initial Franchise Fee for up to two Standard Franchises, but are ineligible for other discounts, including Conversion Franchise discounts. This creates confusion and potential disputes if a Related Franchisee also qualifies for a Conversion Franchise.
- The FDD lacks clarity on which discount takes precedence and how these scenarios are handled, potentially leading to inconsistent application and franchisee dissatisfaction.
Potential Mitigations:
- Clarify in the FDD which discount takes precedence in cases where a franchisee qualifies for multiple discounts.
- Establish a clear policy for applying discounts and communicate it transparently to all potential franchisees.
- Provide examples in the FDD illustrating how discounts are calculated in different scenarios.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5.4: "A Related Franchisee cannot use any other discounts, including for a Conversion Franchise."
Arbitrary Initial Package Fee Waivers/Reductions
Medium
Explanation:
- Items 5.4 and 5.5 grant the franchisor sole discretion to waive or reduce the Initial Package Fee for Related and Expansion Franchisees based on "types and condition of equipment." This lack of objective criteria creates a risk of inconsistent application and potential favoritism.
- Franchisees may perceive unfairness if waivers or reductions are not applied consistently, leading to disputes and dissatisfaction.
Potential Mitigations:
- Establish clear, objective criteria for waiving or reducing the Initial Package Fee based on equipment assessment.
- Document the evaluation process and provide written justifications for decisions to ensure transparency and fairness.
- Develop a standardized equipment evaluation form to ensure consistent application of criteria.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5.4: "Depending on the types and condition of the equipment you already own, the Initial Package Fee may be waived or reduced in our sole discretion."
- Item 5.5: "Depending on the quantities, types, and condition of the equipment you already own, the Initial Package Fee may be waived or reduced in our sole discretion."
Lack of Transparency in Renewal Terms
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 5.6 states that upon renewal, franchisees may be required to purchase "new or additional equipment" at their sole expense, without specifying the types, quantities, or costs of such equipment.
- This lack of transparency creates uncertainty for franchisees regarding their future financial obligations and potential impact on profitability during the renewal term.
Potential Mitigations:
- Provide more specific information about potential equipment requirements during renewal, including estimated costs and justification for such requirements.
- Develop a clear equipment upgrade policy and communicate it to franchisees well in advance of the renewal period.
- Offer financing options or support programs to assist franchisees with equipment purchases during renewal.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5.6: "...you may be required by us to purchase new or additional equipment, at your sole expense."
Non-Refundable Initial Fees
High
Explanation:
- Item 5.6 states that the Initial Franchise Fee and Initial Package Fee are non-refundable and deemed fully earned upon payment, regardless of the franchisee's success or the franchisor's performance.
- This creates a significant financial risk for franchisees, as they lose their entire investment if the business fails or the relationship with the franchisor terminates prematurely.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consider offering partial refunds under certain circumstances, such as franchisee termination due to franchisor breach of contract.
- Provide a more detailed explanation of how the initial fees are used to support franchisees and justify their non-refundable nature.
- Explore alternative fee structures that offer more flexibility and reduce the financial risk for franchisees.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5.6: "The Initial Franchise Fee and Initial Package Fee are paid to us, are non-refundable, and deemed fully earned upon payment."
Lack of Detail Regarding Insurance Requirements
Low
Explanation:
- Item 8 refers to insurance obligations in Item 6, 7, and 8, but Item 8 itself states "None." This lack of specific information about insurance requirements creates uncertainty for potential franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Provide detailed information about required insurance coverage types, amounts, and costs in Item 8 or the referenced sections.
- Include a sample insurance policy or a list of approved insurance providers to guide franchisees.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "None"
- Item 8 Table: "Sections 7.D, Items 6, 7, and 8" (referencing insurance obligations)
Franchisor Support Risks
7 risks identified
3
3
1
Weak Intellectual Property Protection
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that while the franchisor claims copyright on the Operations Manuals, they have not filed for official registration. This weakens their legal standing in case of infringement and could make it harder to protect the franchise system's intellectual property.
- The FDD also mentions they "need not protect or defend copyrights" unless in their best interest, creating uncertainty about their commitment to protecting franchisees from IP infringement.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request clarification on the franchisor's strategy for protecting their IP, including plans for copyright registration and enforcement. Seek legal counsel to review the IP provisions in the franchise agreement.
- Inquire about past instances of IP infringement and how they were handled by the franchisor.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: "Although we have not filed an application for a copyright registration for the Operations Manuals, we claim a copyright…"
- Item 11: "We need not protect or defend copyrights, although we may do so when this action is, in our opinion, in the best interest of the System."
Limited Franchisor Support for Copyright Infringement
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states the franchisor is "not obligated to take any action" regarding unauthorized use of proprietary information, only responding "as we deem appropriate." This lack of commitment could leave franchisees vulnerable to IP infringement with limited support from the franchisor.
Potential Mitigations:
- Negotiate stronger protections in the Franchise Agreement regarding franchisor support in case of IP infringement. Seek legal counsel to review these provisions.
- Request specific examples of how the franchisor has responded to past instances of unauthorized use of proprietary information.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: "We are not obligated to take any action, but will respond to this information as we deem appropriate."
Mandatory Disclosure of Franchisee-Developed IP
High
Explanation:
- The FDD requires franchisees to disclose all developed ideas, concepts, and techniques to the franchisor, which become franchisor property. This could stifle franchisee innovation and create potential conflicts if franchisees believe their contributions are not adequately recognized or compensated.
Potential Mitigations:
- Negotiate clearer terms regarding ownership and potential compensation for franchisee-developed intellectual property. Seek legal counsel to review these provisions.
- Request clarification on how the franchisor intends to use franchisee-generated ideas and concepts.
FDD Citations:
- Item 14.2: "All ideas, concepts, techniques or materials…must be promptly disclosed to us, will be considered our property…"
Lack of Detail on Advertising Support
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 8 lists advertising as a franchisor obligation but provides no details. Item 11 mentions marketing materials but lacks specifics on the level and type of advertising support provided. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to assess the adequacy of franchisor assistance in attracting customers.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request a detailed advertising plan, including budget allocation, media strategy, and examples of marketing materials. Inquire about the franchisor's digital marketing strategy and support.
- Speak with existing franchisees about the effectiveness of the franchisor's advertising programs.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "o. Advertising"
- Item 11: "(e) written marketing and advertising materials, audiotapes, videos, and programs for their utilization;"
Limited Information on Training Programs
Medium
Explanation:
- While Item 11 mentions training programs (Jumpstart, Business Manager, Technical Operations), it lacks details on the duration, content, and effectiveness of these programs. Insufficient training could hinder franchisee success.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request a detailed training curriculum, including timelines, topics covered, and training methodologies. Inquire about ongoing training and support after the initial program.
- Speak with existing franchisees about their training experience and its practical value.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: "(d) the Jumpstart Training Program and Business Manager and Technical Operations Training Program;"
Vague "Reasonable Steps" for Protecting Confidential Information
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD requires franchisees to take "reasonable steps" to prevent unauthorized use of confidential information, but doesn't define what constitutes "reasonable." This vagueness could lead to disputes and create uncertainty about franchisee obligations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request specific examples of "reasonable steps" expected from franchisees. Seek legal counsel to review these requirements.
- Clarify the consequences of failing to meet these undefined "reasonable steps."
FDD Citations:
- Item 14.2: "You may not use our confidential information…and you must take reasonable steps to prevent unauthorized use or disclosure…"
Lack of Detail Regarding Ongoing Support
Low
Explanation:
- While the FDD mentions Operations Manuals and training programs, it lacks specific details about the ongoing support provided to franchisees after the initial setup. This lack of clarity makes it difficult to assess the level of assistance available for day-to-day operations, problem-solving, and business growth.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request a detailed description of ongoing support services, including frequency of communication, availability of field consultants, and access to technical assistance. Inquire about the franchisor's support structure and resources.
- Speak with existing franchisees about the level and quality of ongoing support they receive.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: General discussion of Operations Manuals and training programs, but lacks specifics on ongoing support.
- Item 8: Lacks detail on specific support obligations beyond broad categories.
Exit & Transfer Risks
6 risks identified
2
3
1
Limited Transfer Rights
High
Explanation:
- The FDD does not explicitly detail the process or restrictions on transferring the franchise. Lack of clarity creates uncertainty and potential difficulties for franchisees wishing to sell their business.
- Without clear guidelines, the franchisor may have significant control, potentially delaying or denying transfers, impacting the franchisee's exit strategy.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review Item 19 of the FDD for any mentions of transfer restrictions or requirements. Consult with a franchise attorney to understand the implications.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for more favorable transfer terms and include them in the franchise agreement.
- Research state franchise laws regarding transfer rights and protections.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19 (Assumed - content not provided): Review this section for any details on transfer rights, restrictions, and procedures.
Termination Risk in Virginia
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 17.h highlights the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, which requires "reasonable cause" for franchise termination. Any termination clause in the franchise agreement not meeting this standard may be unenforceable in Virginia.
- This creates a degree of uncertainty for franchisees operating in Virginia, as the interpretation of "reasonable cause" can be subjective.
Potential Mitigations:
- If operating in Virginia, carefully review the termination clauses in the franchise agreement with a Virginia franchise attorney to ensure compliance with the state's Retail Franchising Act.
- Seek clarification from the franchisor on their interpretation of "reasonable cause" and document their responses.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17.h: "Pursuant to Section 13.1-564 of the Virginia Retail Franchising Act, it is unlawful for a franchisor to cancel a franchise without reasonable cause."
Waiver Prohibition in Virginia
Low
Explanation:
- Item 17.h states that franchisees cannot waive claims under state franchise laws, including fraud in the inducement, or disclaim reliance on franchisor statements. This is specific to Virginia law.
Potential Mitigations:
- Be aware of this provision and understand its implications. If operating in Virginia, this offers some protection against potential misrepresentations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17.h: "No statement, questionnaire, or acknowledgment...shall have the effect of (i) waiving any claims under any applicable state franchise law, including fraud in the inducement, or (ii) disclaiming reliance on any statement made by any franchisor...".
Renewal Risk
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD lacks details on franchise renewal terms, creating uncertainty about the franchisee's future after the initial term expires.
- The franchisor may have significant discretion in renewal decisions, potentially impacting the franchisee's long-term investment.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review Item 19 (assumed location) of the FDD for any information regarding renewal terms and conditions. Consult with a franchise attorney.
- Negotiate favorable renewal terms with the franchisor and ensure they are clearly documented in the franchise agreement.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19 (Assumed - content not provided): Review this section for any details on renewal terms, conditions, and franchisor's discretion.
Resale Value Uncertainty
Medium
Explanation:
- While the FDD provides a list of franchisees (Exhibit F), it doesn't offer information on past franchise resales or their valuations. This makes it difficult to assess the potential resale value of the franchise, a crucial factor in exit planning.
- The relatively young age of the franchise system (founded in 2015) further complicates resale value estimation due to limited historical data.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a business broker specializing in franchise resales to get an independent assessment of potential resale value.
- Network with existing franchisees to inquire about their experiences and perspectives on resale potential.
- Research comparable businesses in the home services industry to gauge market values.
FDD Citations:
- Exhibit F: Provides a list of current franchisees but no information on resales.
Lack of Liquidation Options
High
Explanation:
- The FDD doesn't specify any options or processes for liquidating the franchise assets in case the business is not successful or the franchisee chooses not to transfer or renew.
- This lack of clarity poses a significant risk to the franchisee's initial investment, as they may face difficulties recovering any value from the business upon exit.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a franchise attorney to understand potential legal options for liquidating franchise assets.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for potential buy-back options or assistance in selling the assets to a third party.
- Develop a detailed exit strategy that considers various scenarios, including liquidation, and outlines potential steps for maximizing asset recovery.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19 (Assumed - content not provided): Review this section for any details on liquidation options or procedures.
Operational & Brand Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Dependence on Franchisor's Technology and Software
High
Explanation:
- The FDD highlights the franchisor's proprietary WATER DAMAGE Software and Operations Manual as critical components of the business. Heavy reliance on these creates a significant dependency on the franchisor. If the software malfunctions, becomes outdated, or if access is revoked, franchisee operations could be severely disrupted.
- The franchisor's control over software updates, features, and pricing could also impact profitability. Lack of flexibility in adapting to changing market conditions or integrating with other preferred software solutions poses a risk.
- Restricting the use of Customer Information to only franchisor-approved software limits franchisee flexibility and control over their own customer data.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly evaluate the WATER DAMAGE Software during due diligence. Seek independent expert assessment of its functionality, reliability, and security. Inquire about disaster recovery plans and data backup procedures.
- Negotiate for clear service level agreements (SLAs) regarding software uptime, support, and future development. Clarify data ownership and access rights in the franchise agreement.
- Explore alternative software solutions that could be used if the franchisor's software proves inadequate. Discuss potential integration options with the franchisor upfront.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: Description of Operations Manuals and proprietary software.
- Item 14.2: Restrictions on use of Customer Information and software.
Limited Control Over Customer Data
High
Explanation:
- The FDD states that the franchisor owns all customer lists and requires franchisees to maintain customer information within their proprietary software. This restricts the franchisee's ability to use their customer data for independent marketing or if they choose to leave the franchise system.
- The requirement to use only franchisor-approved software for Customer Information limits flexibility and could hinder the adoption of new technologies or marketing strategies.
Potential Mitigations:
- Negotiate for greater control over customer data, including the right to export data in a usable format. Clearly define data ownership and usage rights in the franchise agreement.
- Seek legal counsel to review the data ownership clauses and ensure they align with your long-term business goals.
- Understand the implications of data restrictions on future business decisions, such as selling the business or transitioning to a different platform.
FDD Citations:
- Item 14.2: "You acknowledge and agree that we own any and all customer lists…".
- Item 14.2: "You may not enter the Customer Information into any other types of software that have not been approved by us."
Brand Reputation Risk
Medium
Explanation:
- The success of a franchise is heavily reliant on the brand's reputation. Negative publicity or actions by other franchisees can negatively impact the entire system, including individual franchisees who were not involved.
- The FDD does not explicitly detail the brand's reputation management strategy or how they address negative publicity.
Potential Mitigations:
- Research the brand's online presence and reputation thoroughly. Look for news articles, reviews, and social media mentions to assess public perception.
- Speak with existing franchisees about their experiences with brand reputation management and support from the franchisor.
- Inquire about the franchisor's crisis communication plan and how they handle negative publicity or franchisee misconduct.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11: Discusses Operations Manuals and proprietary information, indirectly related to brand consistency and reputation.
Performance & ROI Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Wide Range of Gross Sales Performance
High
Explanation:
- Item 19 reveals a substantial disparity in reported gross sales figures, with the highest performer achieving $6,053,823 and the lowest only $15,632 during the Measurement Period. This vast difference indicates significant variability in franchisee performance and raises concerns about the predictability and consistency of revenue generation.
- The wide range suggests potential challenges in market penetration, operational efficiency, sales strategies, or other factors that could significantly impact a new franchisee's success.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly investigate the reasons behind the wide performance gap. Analyze the business practices of top performers and identify any common success factors. Conversely, understand the challenges faced by low performers and assess whether those issues are replicable or avoidable.
- Develop a detailed business plan with realistic projections based on the lower quartile performance figures. This conservative approach will provide a buffer against potential underperformance and allow for better financial planning.
- Seek expert advice on market analysis, sales strategies, and operational efficiency to optimize business performance and mitigate the risk of low revenue generation.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19, Table 1: "Highest $6,053,823, Lowest $15,632"
Unproven Franchise Model
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor, 1-800 Water Damage, was founded in 2015, indicating a relatively young franchise system. This lack of extensive operational history presents a risk as the long-term viability and success of the franchise model are yet to be fully established.
- New franchise systems may experience unforeseen challenges in areas such as brand recognition, operational procedures, and ongoing support, which could impact a franchisee's profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully evaluate the franchisor's experience and expertise in the industry. Assess the management team's track record and their ability to adapt to changing market conditions.
- Seek legal and financial advice to thoroughly review the FDD and understand the potential risks associated with investing in a relatively new franchise system.
- Connect with existing franchisees to gain insights into their experiences and assess the level of support provided by the franchisor.
FDD Citations:
- FDD Cover Page: "Founded: 2015"
Limited Franchisee Sample Size
Medium
Explanation:
- Item 19 presents data from only 86 "Reported Franchisees" out of a total of 99 franchisees operating as of December 31, 2024. This limited sample size may not accurately represent the overall performance of the franchise system and could skew the presented financial metrics.
- The exclusion of 13 franchisees further reduces the data pool and raises questions about the reasons for their exclusion and the potential impact on the overall performance picture.
Potential Mitigations:
- Inquire about the reasons for excluding 13 franchisees from the Item 19 data. Understand their performance and any factors that led to their exclusion.
- Request additional financial data from a larger sample of franchisees to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the system's performance.
- Consult with a franchise consultant or accountant to analyze the available data and assess the potential impact of the limited sample size on the presented metrics.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "As of December 31, 2024, there were 99 franchisees...This Item sets forth...information...for 86 Franchisees...Excluded from this Item 19 are 13 franchisees..."
FDD Documents by Year
Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents
FDD Year: 2025
Uploaded: 8/8/2025
FDD Year: 2024
Uploaded: 8/25/2025
FDD Documents
Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year