1-800-Packouts
Home Services
Founded 201448 locationsCompany Profile
Year Founded:2014
1-800-Packouts Franchise Cost
| Franchise Fee: | $62,500Key Metric |
| Total Investment: | $269,000 - $514,000Key Metric |
| Liquid Capital: | $67,500 |
| Royalty Fee: | 7% of gross sales |
| Marketing Fee: | 3% of gross sales |
Quick ROI Calculator
Based on 1-800-Packouts's actual financial data
Outlet Counts by Year
Historical outlet data extracted from FDD documents
Total US Locations:48
Scale relative to 1,000 locations
Franchised Units:48
Additional Information
Processing Franchise Details
Our AI is extracting detailed information from franchise documents.
Company history, executive team profiles, and legal disclosures will appear here once document processing is complete.
Search Interests & Trends
Search Volume Data and Trend Analysis
Search Interest & Trends
No Trends Data Available
Trend analysis data for 1-800-Packouts is being collected. Check back soon for insights.
AI-Powered Due Diligence Analysis
Our advanced AI analyzes Franchise Disclosure Documents (FDDs) to identify potential risks and opportunities across 10 critical categories.
11
High Risk
Critical items
32% of total
22
Medium Risk
Monitor closely
65% of total
1
Low Risk
Manageable items
3% of total
34
Total Items
Factors analyzed
10 categories
6.47
Overall Score
Low RiskHigh Risk
010
Franchisor Stability Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Limited Operating History Under Current Ownership
Medium
Explanation:
- 1-800-Packouts Holdco, LLC, the current franchisor, was organized in December 2021 and acquired the predecessor company in January 2022. This relatively short operating history under the current ownership structure presents a risk as their ability to effectively support franchisees and navigate the market is yet to be fully proven.
- While the brand itself has existed since 2014, the new ownership's strategies, management, and overall approach could differ significantly, impacting franchisee success.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the new ownership's background, experience, and financial stability. Investigate their track record in other businesses, if any.
- Speak with existing franchisees about their experiences under both the previous and current ownership to gauge any changes in support, profitability, and overall satisfaction.
- Carefully analyze the FDD for any disclosures regarding the transition and its potential impact on franchisees.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "We are a Georgia limited liability company that was organized on December 23, 2021."
- Item 1: "In January 2022, we had a change of ownership and were acquired by FS PEP Holdco, LLC."
Private Equity Ownership Focus
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor is owned by FS PEP Holdco, LLC, an affiliate of Princeton Equity Group, a private equity firm. Private equity firms often prioritize maximizing returns and may implement strategies focused on short-term gains rather than long-term brand building and franchisee support.
- This can lead to decisions such as rapid expansion, cost-cutting measures, or even resale of the company, which could negatively impact franchisees.
Potential Mitigations:
- Research Princeton Equity Group's history with other franchise brands. Look for patterns of rapid expansion, franchisee disputes, or quick flips.
- Inquire about the private equity firm's long-term plans for 1-800-Packouts and how those plans might affect franchisees.
- Consult with a franchise attorney experienced in dealing with private equity-owned franchisors to understand the potential risks and legal protections available.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "Our parent is FS PEP Holdco, LLC, an affiliate of Princeton Equity Group, LLC, a private equity firm."
Overreliance on Affiliated Vendors
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor has several affiliates providing services like marketing, software, and call center support. While this can create synergy, it also presents a risk of reduced competitiveness and potentially inflated pricing for franchisees who are obligated to use these services.
- Lack of independent vendor options can limit franchisees' flexibility and control over their businesses.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the costs associated with using affiliated vendors and compare them to market rates for similar services.
- Negotiate for the right to use alternative vendors if affiliated services are unsatisfactory or overpriced.
- Inquire about the performance and reputation of these affiliated vendors with existing franchisees.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: Mentions several affiliated companies providing various services, including Five Star Connect, Inc. (ProNexis).
Disclosure & Representation Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Limited Operating History
Medium
Explanation:
- 1-800-Packouts was founded in 2014. While not extremely new, this is a shorter operating history compared to more established franchise brands. This presents a risk as there's less long-term data to assess the franchise system's resilience to economic downturns, changing market conditions, and evolving consumer preferences.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the company's performance history, including financial statements, growth trajectory, and franchisee testimonials. Look for evidence of consistent growth and profitability.
- Speak with existing franchisees about their experiences, challenges, and successes. Inquire about the support provided by the franchisor and the overall health of the franchise network.
- Analyze the competitive landscape and assess the brand's differentiation and market positioning. Understand how the franchise system adapts to changes in the home services industry.
FDD Citations:
- While the FDD provides the founding date (2014), it's crucial to conduct independent research to supplement the information provided.
No Guaranteed Territory Exclusivity
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD does not explicitly guarantee exclusive territory rights. This could lead to increased competition from other franchisees or even the franchisor itself within the same geographic area, potentially impacting market share and profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review Item 12 of the FDD to understand the specific territorial provisions and any limitations on exclusivity. Clarify any ambiguities with the franchisor.
- Assess the market density and potential for encroachment from other franchisees. Consider the population size, demographics, and competitive landscape within the designated territory.
- Negotiate for stronger territorial protections if possible, or at least gain a clear understanding of the franchisor's future development plans in the surrounding area.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12 - Territory: Analyze the specific language regarding territorial rights and any potential for overlap or encroachment.
Significant Capital Investment
High
Explanation:
- The investment range of $269,000 - $514,000 represents a substantial financial commitment. This high initial investment increases the financial risk for franchisees, especially in the early stages of operation before profitability is established.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop a comprehensive financial plan that includes detailed projections of revenue, expenses, and cash flow. Consult with a financial advisor to assess the feasibility of the investment and the potential return on investment.
- Secure adequate financing from reputable lenders. Explore various financing options and compare interest rates and terms to minimize borrowing costs.
- Carefully manage startup expenses and adhere to a realistic budget. Prioritize essential expenditures and avoid unnecessary spending during the initial phase of the business.
FDD Citations:
- Item 7 - Estimated Initial Investment: Review the detailed breakdown of investment costs to understand the specific components and potential variations.
Financial & Fee Risks
5 risks identified
3
2
High Franchise Turnover Rate
High
Explanation:
- The FDD discloses a high turnover rate (over 25%) of franchised outlets terminated, not renewed, reacquired, or ceased operations in the last three years. This indicates potential systemic issues within the franchise model, such as inadequate support, unrealistic financial projections, or market saturation.
- A high turnover rate can negatively impact brand reputation, create instability within the franchise network, and reduce potential resale value for your franchise.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly investigate the reasons behind the high turnover rate. Contact existing and former franchisees to understand their experiences and challenges.
- Analyze the franchisor's support systems, training programs, and marketing strategies to assess their effectiveness.
- Develop a realistic business plan with conservative financial projections, considering potential challenges and market conditions.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5, Specific Risks: "During the last 3 years, a high percentage of franchised outlets (more than 25%) were terminated, not renewed, re-acquired, or ceased operations for other reasons."
Spousal Liability
High
Explanation:
- The FDD requires spousal guarantees for all financial obligations, even if the spouse has no ownership interest. This exposes personal and marital assets, including the family home, to significant risk in case of franchise failure.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a legal professional to fully understand the implications of the spousal guarantee and explore options for limiting liability.
- Develop a robust business plan and financial projections to minimize the risk of franchise failure.
- Consider alternative franchise opportunities that do not require spousal guarantees.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5, Specific Risks: "Your spouse must sign a document that makes your spouse liable for all financial obligations under the franchise agreement even though your spouse has no ownership interest in the franchise."
Franchisor Financial Condition (Maryland)
High
Explanation:
- The Maryland Securities Commissioner has required a financial assurance due to the franchisor's financial condition. This indicates potential financial instability and raises concerns about the franchisor's ability to fulfill its obligations and provide adequate support to franchisees.
- Deferred fees, while seemingly protective, could also indicate cash flow problems for the franchisor.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the franchisor's financial statements (Item 21) and discuss any concerns with a financial advisor.
- Inquire about the specific reasons for the required financial assurance from the Maryland Securities Commissioner.
- Assess the franchisor's ability to provide ongoing support and resources despite the financial assurance.
FDD Citations:
- Item 5: "Based upon the franchisor’s financial condition, the Maryland Securities Commissioner has required a financial assurance."
Potential for Litigation and Jurisdictional Restrictions (Minnesota)
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD includes specific addenda for Minnesota regarding jurisdictional restrictions on litigation and franchisee rights. While these provisions aim to protect Minnesota franchisees, they also highlight potential conflicts and complexities in legal proceedings.
Potential Mitigations:
- If operating in Minnesota, consult with a legal professional specializing in franchise law to understand the implications of these state-specific regulations.
- Be aware of the potential limitations on choice of venue and other legal procedures.
FDD Citations:
- Item 13, Minnesota Addendum
- Item 17, Minnesota Addendum
Variability in State-Specific Regulations
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD includes specific addenda and modifications for various states (e.g., Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Washington), indicating variations in franchise regulations and requirements across different jurisdictions. This can create complexities in legal compliance and operational practices.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with legal counsel specializing in franchise law to understand the specific regulations and requirements in your intended state of operation.
- Carefully review all state-specific addenda and modifications in the FDD.
- Ensure your business operations and practices comply with all applicable state and federal regulations.
FDD Citations:
- Various Items and State-Specific Addenda (Maryland, Minnesota, New York, Washington)
Legal & Contract Risks
3 risks identified
3
Choice of Law/Forum Discrepancies & Potential Enforceability Issues
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD presents conflicting choice of law and forum clauses across different state addendums. North Dakota's addendum specifies North Dakota law governs 'except for federal law,' while Rhode Island's mandates Illinois law 'except as required by the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act.' This creates ambiguity and potential conflicts.
- The enforceability of these clauses can be challenged, leading to jurisdictional disputes and increased litigation costs.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with an attorney specializing in franchise law to understand the implications of these conflicting clauses in your specific state.
- Seek clarification from the franchisor regarding the practical application of these clauses in case of a dispute.
- Negotiate with the franchisor to establish a mutually agreeable and clearly defined choice of law and forum provision.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, North Dakota Addendum (5): "Except for federal law, North Dakota law governs."
- Item 17, Rhode Island Addendum (2): "Illinois law governs except as otherwise required by the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act."
Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants (Non-Compete)
Medium
Explanation:
- The North Dakota addendum acknowledges that non-compete covenants are generally unenforceable in the state, yet the franchisor intends to enforce them "to the extent enforceable." This creates uncertainty and potential legal challenges.
- The Washington addendum highlights specific income thresholds for enforcing non-compete covenants against employees and independent contractors, potentially limiting the franchisor's ability to restrict competition.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a legal professional in your respective state (ND or WA) to understand the limitations on non-compete agreements.
- Clarify with the franchisor the specific scope and intended enforcement of the non-compete clause in your situation.
- Negotiate a more reasonable and enforceable non-compete agreement, if necessary.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, North Dakota Addendum (3): "Covenants not to compete...generally are considered unenforceable in North Dakota. However, we will seek to enforce them to the extent enforceable."
- Item 17, Washington Addendum: "Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable..."
State-Specific Law Superseding Franchise Agreement
Medium
Explanation:
- The Washington addendum states that Washington's Franchise Investment Protection Act (FIPA) may supersede the Franchise Agreement, particularly regarding termination and renewal. This could lead to discrepancies between the agreement and applicable state law.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the Washington FIPA and compare it with the Franchise Agreement to identify any potential conflicts.
- Consult with a Washington-licensed attorney specializing in franchise law to understand your rights and obligations under the FIPA.
- Discuss any discrepancies with the franchisor and seek clarification on how they will be addressed.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, Washington Addendum: "The State of Washington has a statute, RCW 19.100.180, which might supersede the Franchise Agreement..."
Territory & Competition Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Non-Exclusive Territory & Competition from Other Franchisees
High
Explanation:
- The FDD explicitly states that territories are non-exclusive, meaning other 1-800-Packouts franchisees can operate and compete within your designated area. This significantly increases competition and can impact market share and profitability.
- The FDD mentions potential competition from company-owned businesses and other distribution channels controlled by the franchisor, further intensifying the competitive landscape.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly research the existing franchisee density and competitive landscape in your desired territory before signing the agreement.
- Develop a strong local marketing strategy to differentiate your business and build a loyal customer base.
- Focus on providing exceptional customer service and building strong relationships within the community to gain a competitive edge.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "You will be granted a territory (“Your Territory”). Your Territory will not be exclusive."
- Item 12: "You may face competition from other franchisees, from company-owned businesses, or from other channels of distribution or competitive brands that we control."
Territory Size and Population Density Variability
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD indicates that territory size, based on population, is determined solely at the franchisor's discretion and can vary significantly (from 1 to 1,000,000 people). This uncertainty makes it difficult to project market potential and revenue.
- The requirement to purchase an additional franchise if the population exceeds 1,250,000 introduces a potential for unexpected future costs and complexities.
Potential Mitigations:
- Clearly understand the criteria used by the franchisor to determine territory size and population density.
- Negotiate for a territory with a sufficient population base to support your business goals.
- Analyze demographic data and market potential within the proposed territory to assess its viability.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "Your Territory will be determined in our sole discretion based upon population density, demographics and other Franchised Business operations in the market."
- Item 12: "Territories may range from 1 to 1,000,000 people."
- Item 12: "Your Territory may not exceed a population of 1,000,000 people, in the event the population exceeds 1,250,000 people you will be required to purchase an additional franchise."
Uncertain Benefits from National/Regional Opportunity Protection (NROP) Program
Medium
Explanation:
- While the NROP program aims to benefit franchisees by enrolling insurance companies and other organizations, the FDD states that there's no guarantee of receiving benefits within your territory.
- The NROP fee is payable regardless of participation or benefits received, creating a potential for sunk costs.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request detailed information about the NROP program, including current enrollees and their geographic coverage.
- Assess the potential value of the NROP program relative to its cost and consider alternative lead generation strategies.
- Negotiate for performance-based NROP fees or a clear understanding of the program's benefits before committing.
FDD Citations:
- Item 12: "…we cannot assure that any enrollees in our NROP program will provide you such benefits in your Territory."
- Item 12: "Your NROP Fee is owed regardless if whether you enroll in all, some, or none of the NROP programs."
Regulatory & Compliance Risks
5 risks identified
1
3
1
Rapid Growth and Acquisition Leading to Integration Challenges and Compliance Oversights
High
Explanation:
- 1-800-Packouts has experienced rapid growth and acquisitions of several other franchise brands in diverse industries. This rapid expansion can lead to integration challenges, potentially impacting compliance with regulations specific to each industry (e.g., environmental regulations for hazardous material cleaning, healthcare regulations for counseling services). Consistent application of System Standards across diverse brands poses a significant risk.
- The franchisor's change of ownership in January 2022 and subsequent affiliations introduce further complexity to regulatory compliance. Ensuring consistent standards and practices across all affiliated entities increases the risk of oversight and potential violations.
- The FDD mentions offering printing services to affiliate franchises as a vendor. This introduces potential compliance issues related to advertising regulations, consumer protection laws, and potentially data privacy if customer data is involved.
Potential Mitigations:
- Implement robust compliance programs tailored to each franchise brand, addressing specific industry regulations. Conduct regular audits to ensure adherence.
- Develop clear integration strategies for newly acquired brands, focusing on aligning operations and compliance procedures with the franchisor's overall framework.
- Establish a centralized compliance department to oversee all affiliated entities and ensure consistent application of regulatory requirements.
- Seek legal counsel specializing in franchising and the specific industries of each acquired brand to ensure compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "In January 2022, we had a change of ownership...As a result of this transaction, we are under common control as entities named below."
- Item 1: Listing of numerous affiliated companies in diverse industries.
- Item 1: "In 2025, it additionally began offering printing services to affiliate franchises as a vendor."
Territorial Disputes and Encroachment
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD mentions designated territories for franchisees but doesn't detail how these territories are defined or protected. Lack of clarity can lead to disputes between franchisees over customer allocation and potential encroachment, especially with the franchisor's rapid expansion and multiple brands operating in potentially overlapping markets.
Potential Mitigations:
- Clearly define territories in the Franchise Agreement, specifying geographical boundaries or customer allocation methods.
- Establish a mechanism for resolving territorial disputes between franchisees, such as mediation or arbitration.
- Include provisions in the Franchise Agreement that prohibit encroachment and specify penalties for violations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "...to develop and operate a business...in a designated territory (the “Territory”)."
- Item 1: "You will have no obligation, nor any right, to open any additional Franchised Businesses outside of your Territory."
Dependence on Third-Party Vendors
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD highlights the System's reliance on relationships with vendors. Dependence on third-party vendors for essential supplies, equipment, or services can create risks related to supply chain disruptions, price fluctuations, and quality control, potentially impacting franchisee operations and compliance with System Standards.
Potential Mitigations:
- Diversify vendor relationships to reduce reliance on any single supplier.
- Negotiate long-term contracts with vendors to secure stable pricing and supply.
- Implement quality control measures to ensure vendors meet the franchisor's standards.
- Develop contingency plans for potential supply chain disruptions.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "The distinguishing characteristics of the System include, but are not limited to,...our relationships with vendors;..."
Operating Principal Requirement and Potential Turnover
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD mandates an Operating Principal with significant authority and decision-making power. While this ensures a dedicated point of contact, it also creates a risk if the Operating Principal leaves the franchise. Turnover in this key role could disrupt operations and compliance, especially if the replacement lacks the necessary experience or training.
Potential Mitigations:
- Develop a robust training program for Operating Principals, covering all aspects of franchise operations and compliance requirements.
- Encourage franchisees to develop succession plans for the Operating Principal role.
- Provide ongoing support and resources to Operating Principals to ensure their success.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "You must designate an Owner to serve as the “Operating Principal.” The Operating Principal must have authority over all business decisions related to your Franchised Business and must have the power to bind you in all dealings with us."
Limited Operating History of the Current Franchisor Entity
Low
Explanation:
- While the 1-800-PACKOUTS brand has been franchising since 2015, the current franchisor entity, 1-800-Packouts Holdco, LLC, was organized in December 2021. This relatively short operating history of the current franchisor entity presents a risk as there's less established track record to assess its ability to effectively manage the franchise system and ensure regulatory compliance.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review the experience and qualifications of the franchisor's management team, particularly in franchising and the relevant industry.
- Seek legal and financial advice to assess the franchisor's financial stability and long-term viability.
- Contact existing franchisees to gain insights into their experiences with the franchisor and the support provided.
FDD Citations:
- Item 1: "We are a Georgia limited liability company that was organized on December 23, 2021."
- Item 1: "Our Predecessor began offering 1-800-PACKOUTS franchises in July 2015; we began offering 1-800-PACKOUTS franchises since our inception..."
Franchisor Support Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Limited Pre-Opening Support Beyond Approval and Guidance
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor's pre-opening assistance primarily focuses on approvals (site, lease, plans) and providing training and guidance. They explicitly state they do not assist with providing, delivering, or installing equipment, signs, fixtures, or inventory.
- This lack of hands-on support could lead to delays, increased costs, and potential errors for new franchisees who may lack experience in setting up a business.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly review Item 11 and the Franchise Agreement to fully understand the limitations of pre-opening support.
- Develop a detailed project plan for the pre-opening phase, including sourcing and installation of equipment, signage, and inventory.
- Seek independent advice from experienced business setup consultants or contractors to fill the gaps in franchisor support.
- Negotiate with the franchisor for additional support, even if it comes at an extra cost, especially if you lack experience in these areas.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11, Pre-Opening Obligations (1), (2): "We do not provide assistance in providing, delivery, or installation of equipment, signs, fixtures, opening inventory, or supplies…"
Limited Ongoing Operational Support and Potential for High Consulting Fees
Medium
Explanation:
- While the franchisor offers ongoing guidance, additional support is provided on a "request and expense" basis at an hourly charge.
- This could become costly and deter franchisees from seeking necessary assistance, potentially impacting their operational efficiency and profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Clarify the hourly rate for additional support and negotiate a cap or a discounted rate for a set number of consulting hours.
- Budget adequately for potential consulting fees during the first year of operation.
- Develop strong internal operational capabilities to minimize reliance on franchisor consulting.
- Network with other franchisees to share best practices and solutions, reducing the need for paid franchisor support.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11, Ongoing Assistance (2): "At your request and expense, provide additional guidance and assistance to you for an hourly charge."
Complete Franchisor Control Over Brand Fund Expenditures
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor has "sole discretion" over how the Brand Fund is spent, with no guarantee of local market focus or proportional benefit to franchisees based on their contributions.
- This lack of transparency and control could lead to ineffective marketing campaigns that don't benefit individual franchisees, despite their mandatory contributions.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the Brand Fund section of the FDD and Franchise Agreement.
- Inquire about the franchisor's marketing strategy and past Brand Fund expenditures during the discovery process.
- Request regular reporting on Brand Fund activity and results.
- Consider joining a franchisee advisory council to have a voice in marketing decisions.
FDD Citations:
- Item 11, Advertising, Brand Fund: "We will determine, in our sole discretion, when, how and where the payments deposited into the Brand Fund will be spent."
- Item 11, Advertising, Brand Fund: "…we are not obligated to ensure that expenditures by the Brand Fund in or affecting any geographic area are proportionate or equivalent to the contributions…"
Exit & Transfer Risks
3 risks identified
3
Choice of Law/Forum Conflicts & Potential Litigation Complexity
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD includes addendums for North Dakota, Rhode Island, and Washington that modify the choice of law and forum clauses in the standard franchise agreement. These variations create potential complexities in legal disputes, as the applicable law and jurisdiction can differ depending on the franchisee's location.
- This can lead to increased legal costs and uncertainty for franchisees in these states, particularly if they are unfamiliar with the specific laws and regulations governing franchises in those jurisdictions.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the specific addendum for your state to understand the choice of law and forum provisions that apply to your franchise agreement.
- Consult with an attorney specializing in franchise law in your state to assess the potential implications of these provisions and develop a strategy for addressing any legal disputes that may arise.
- Consider the potential costs and complexities of litigating in different jurisdictions when evaluating the overall investment risk.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, North Dakota Addendum: "Except for federal law, North Dakota law governs."
- Item 17, Rhode Island Addendum: "Illinois law governs except as otherwise required by the Rhode Island Franchise Investment Act."
- Item 17, Washington Addendum: "In the event of a conflict of laws, the provisions of the Washington Franchise Investment Protection Act, Chapter 19.100 RCW shall prevail."
Enforceability of Restrictive Covenants (Non-Compete)
Medium
Explanation:
- The North Dakota addendum states that non-compete covenants are generally unenforceable in the state, although the franchisor will attempt to enforce them to the extent possible. This creates uncertainty for franchisees regarding the scope and enforceability of post-termination restrictions on their business activities.
- The Washington addendum specifies income thresholds for the enforceability of non-compete covenants against employees and independent contractors, potentially limiting the franchisor's ability to protect its intellectual property and business model.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with an attorney in North Dakota or Washington to understand the specific limitations on non-compete agreements in these states.
- Carefully review the non-compete provisions in the franchise agreement and assess the potential impact on your future business opportunities.
- Negotiate with the franchisor to clarify the scope and enforceability of the non-compete covenant in your specific circumstances.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, North Dakota Addendum: "Covenants not to compete such as those mentioned above generally are considered unenforceable in North Dakota."
- Item 17, Washington Addendum: "Pursuant to RCW 49.62.020, a noncompetition covenant is void and unenforceable..."
State-Specific Franchise Laws Superseding Franchise Agreement
Medium
Explanation:
- The Washington addendum highlights that Washington state law (RCW 19.100.180) and court decisions may supersede the franchise agreement, particularly regarding termination and renewal. This can create uncertainty for franchisees in Washington, as the terms of the agreement may not be fully enforceable.
Potential Mitigations:
- Consult with a Washington state franchise attorney to understand how state law might impact the franchise agreement and your rights as a franchisee.
- Carefully review RCW 19.100.180 and relevant court decisions to understand potential discrepancies between the franchise agreement and Washington law.
FDD Citations:
- Item 17, Washington Addendum: "The State of Washington has a statute, RCW 19.100.180, which might supersede the Franchise Agreement..."
Operational & Brand Risks
3 risks identified
1
2
Mandatory Supplier Dependence
High
Explanation:
- The franchisor mandates the use of specific suppliers for essential services and products, including their affiliate ProNexis for call center, call tracking, and online marketing. This creates a high dependency on these suppliers and limits franchisee flexibility and cost-saving opportunities.
- The franchisor reserves the right to become a mandatory supplier in the future, potentially creating conflicts of interest and increasing costs for franchisees.
- Franchisees are required to purchase certain software services, some from affiliates and others from third parties, with the franchisor collecting funds for some of these services. This lack of transparency and control over vendor selection can lead to higher costs and potential conflicts of interest.
Potential Mitigations:
- Carefully review the mandatory supplier agreements and associated costs. Negotiate for better terms where possible.
- Seek legal advice to understand the implications of mandatory supplier relationships and potential conflicts of interest.
- Assess the market for alternative suppliers and understand the process for seeking approval for alternative vendors.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "Our affiliate, ProNexis, provides call center, call tracking, and online marketing services…and is an approved supplier…to our franchisees."
- Item 8: "…though we reserve the right to require you to purchase items from us or our affiliates in the future."
- Item 8: "You may be required to obtain certain services…some from our Affiliate(s) and others from third parties, and for some of whom we will collect the funds."
Supplier Approval Process Risk
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor holds sole discretion in approving alternative suppliers, which can be a lengthy and uncertain process. This can restrict franchisees from accessing potentially better or more cost-effective options.
- The criteria for supplier approval are not disclosed to franchisees, creating a lack of transparency and making it difficult to anticipate approval outcomes.
- The franchisor may revoke supplier approval at any time, disrupting operations and potentially impacting franchisee profitability.
Potential Mitigations:
- Thoroughly understand the supplier approval process outlined in the FDD.
- Engage with the franchisor early on to discuss potential alternative suppliers and understand their preferences.
- Develop relationships with multiple approved suppliers to mitigate the risk of sudden approval revocations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "We may approve or disapprove a supplier or item in our sole discretion."
- Item 8: "We do not make our criteria for approving suppliers available to franchisees…"
- Item 8: "We may revoke approval of a supplier or a particular item at any time in our sole discretion…"
Changes to Specifications and Standards
Medium
Explanation:
- The franchisor can change specifications and quality standards at any time, potentially requiring franchisees to invest in new equipment, inventory, or training.
- While changes are generally uniform, they can still impose unexpected costs and disrupt operations.
Potential Mitigations:
- Budget for potential changes in specifications and standards.
- Maintain open communication with the franchisor to anticipate upcoming changes.
- Negotiate clear terms regarding the frequency and financial impact of such changes in the franchise agreement.
FDD Citations:
- Item 8: "We may, at any time, in our discretion, change, delete, or add to any of our specifications or quality standards."
Performance & ROI Risks
3 risks identified
2
1
Limited Franchisee Sample Size for Performance Data
High
Explanation:
- The system-wide franchisee performance data is based on a small sample size of only 16 franchisees out of a total of 48 (Item 20). This limited sample may not accurately represent the potential range of outcomes for new franchisees.
- Furthermore, the average number of units operated by these franchisees is 2.06, suggesting that some franchisees own multiple units, which could skew the average revenue figures upwards.
Potential Mitigations:
- Request detailed information on the 16 franchisees included in the sample, such as their location, years in operation, and specific services offered. Compare these characteristics to your target market and planned business model.
- Seek out and speak with current and former franchisees outside of the provided sample to gain a broader perspective on actual performance and challenges.
- Consult with a financial advisor to analyze the provided data and assess the potential ROI based on a range of performance scenarios.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "The following financial data represents 16 franchisees..."
- Item 20: "Total Outlets 2024: 48"
- Item 19: "Of these 16 franchisees whose data is reported, each operated an average of 2.06 locations/units."
Wide Range in Franchisee Revenue
High
Explanation:
- The significant disparity between the high and low revenue figures ($9,120,164 vs. $222,419) indicates a high degree of variability in franchisee performance (Item 19). This suggests that factors beyond the franchisor's control, such as local market conditions, competition, and individual franchisee management, heavily influence profitability.
- Only 25% of franchisees exceeded the average revenue, indicating that a significant portion are performing below average.
Potential Mitigations:
- Conduct thorough market research in your target territory to assess demand for home services, competition, and local economic conditions.
- Develop a detailed business plan that accounts for various revenue scenarios and outlines strategies for managing expenses and maximizing profitability.
- Request clarification from the franchisor on the factors contributing to the wide range in revenue and seek guidance on how to achieve higher performance levels.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "High $9,120,164, Low $222,419"
- Item 19: "Percent Exceeding Average 25%"
Reliance on Single Company-Owned Unit Data
Medium
Explanation:
- The FDD presents financial data from only one company-owned unit, which serves as a training center and may not reflect the typical operational challenges and costs faced by independent franchisees (Item 19).
- The location-specific aspects of the San Diego area, where the company-owned unit operates, may not be replicable in other territories.
Potential Mitigations:
- Discount the company-owned unit data and focus on the franchisee performance information, while acknowledging its limitations.
- Request additional information from the franchisor regarding the operational differences between the company-owned unit and typical franchisee locations.
FDD Citations:
- Item 19: "The following financial data represents the performance of the franchise which operates as a company-controlled franchise."
- Item 19: "It reflects performance related to a territory which has unique location-specific aspects in the San Diego area, which may not all be replicated or representative of your operation in your territory."
FDD Documents by Year
Download and view official Franchise Disclosure Documents
FDD Year: 2025
Uploaded: 8/8/2025
FDD Year: 2024
Uploaded: 8/25/2025
FDD Documents
Access and download Franchise Disclosure Documents by year